(a)
Determine the percentage of tax borne by a demander and supplier if Es is 1.2 and ED is 0.3.
(a)
Explanation of Solution
If the elasticity of demand is 0.3 and elasticity of supply is 1.2, then the percentage of tax borne by a demander and a supplier is as follows:
Thus, the percentage of tax borne by a demander is 80.
Thus, the percentage of tax borne by a supplier is 20.
(b)
Determine the percentage of tax borne by a demander and a supplier if Es is 2 an ED is 3.
(b)
Explanation of Solution
If the elasticity of demand is 3 and elasticity of supply is 2, then the percentage of tax borne by a demander and a supplier can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the percentage of tax borne by a demander is 40.
Thus, the percentage of tax borne by a supplier is 60.
(c)
Determine the percentage of tax borne by a demander and supplier if Es is 1 and ED is 0.5.
(c)
Explanation of Solution
If the elasticity of demand is 0.5 and elasticity of supply is 1, then the percentage of tax borne by a demander and supplier can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the percentage of tax borne by a demander is 66.67.
Thus, the percentage of tax borne by a supplier is 33.33.
(c)
Determine the percentage of tax borne by a demander and supplier if Es is 1 an ED is 0.5.
(c)
Explanation of Solution
If the elasticity of demand is 0.5 and elasticity of supply is 1, then the percentage of tax borne by a demander and supplier can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the percentage of tax borne by a demander is 66.67.
Thus, the percentage of tax borne by a supplier is 33.33.
(d)
Determine the percentage of tax borne by a demander and a supplier if Es is 0.5 and ED is 0.5.
(d)
Explanation of Solution
If the elasticity of demand is 0.5 and elasticity of supply is 0.5, then the percentage of tax borne by a demander and a supplier can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the percentage of tax borne by a demander is 50.
Thus, the percentage of tax borne by a supplier is 50.
(e)
Explain the finding regarding relative elasticity and tax burden.
(e)
Explanation of Solution
Here, the consumers with relatively more elastic demand curve will bear a smaller percentage of the tax. Thus, if the elasticity of demand curves and supply curves eas equal, then the consumer and producer share the tax burden evenly.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 7 Solutions
MICROECONOMICS-ACCESS CARD <CUSTOM>
- The preferences of a consumer are represented by the following utility function: U = min (×1, 2x2) If income is 100 and p1=p2=1 a) What is the optimal bundle? b) If p₁=4, what is the new optimal bundle? c) If p2=4, what is the new optimal bundle? d) Decompose the price effect into income and substitution effect and provide a graphical representation of your results.arrow_forwardChallenges of Nepal's foreign trade.arrow_forwardSolarrow_forward
- The answer is not Carrow_forwardSocial capital includes: a) labour, produced capital, and natural capital. b) human capital, physical capital, and natural resources. c) labour, physical capital, and human capital. d) labour, physical capital, and produced capital.arrow_forwardGeneral Accounting Question solution and give me Blank ? Carrow_forward
- It is possible to use transformational leadership strategies to reach unethical objectives. Traditional leadership theories and morals standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues. For the statement above, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statements.arrow_forwardDiscuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forwardanswerarrow_forward
- Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forwardFor the statement below, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statement. Incompetent leaders can't be ethical leaders. Traditional leadership theories and moral standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues.arrow_forward
- Microeconomics: Principles & PolicyEconomicsISBN:9781337794992Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. SolowPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning