LABOR ECONOMICS
8th Edition
ISBN: 9781260004724
Author: BORJAS
Publisher: RENT MCG
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 7, Problem 13P
a)
To determine
The country with more positively skewed income distribution.
b)
To determine
The country which develop faster.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
How is absolute poverty measured, in comparison to the distribution of national income? Write down a statistic for each measurement. List 3 countries in Latin America with extremely high rates of absolute poverty and 3 countries with very high income inequality. What are 2 factors which may have increased absolute poverty rates throughout the region’s history? Finally, provide 2 factors which have increased income inequality in Latin America throughout its history.
In an economy, over the last decade, each of the top five decile groups has experienced a fall in their share of total income. In contrast, the bottom five decile groups have experienced a substantial increase in their share of total income.
It can be concluded that, over this period, the distribution of income is most likely to have become
A more equal
B more equal but less equitable
C more equitable
D more equitable but less equal
Due to a stagnant income for 23 years, the number of Mexicans who cannot buy the basic basket has been practically the same since 1992. According to data from the National Council for the Evaluation of Social Development Policy (Coneval), in 2014, the 53.2 percent of the population had income below the welfare line, and a monthly per capita income of 3,115 pesos. In 1992, when poverty began to be measured in Mexico, it was 53.1 percent of the population, with an average income of 3,322 pesos. The basic product consumption basket is a necessary element to calculate inflation through the (INPC / GDP deflator / interest rate) _______________________________
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- The European Union has heavily protected its farm sector through import duties. Also, the Union subsidizes its exports of agricultural products. If “cropland†is regarded as a factor of production and is included in the Leontief statistic (along with labor), how would the presence of these agricultural policies affect the results of such tests?arrow_forwardTo what extent is income inequality explained by income differences across different individuals (cross section difference)? To what extent is income inequality explained by income differences over the work career of a given individual (time series difference)? Why is it important to consider both of these factors when evaluating income inequality?arrow_forwardIn a society with 240,000 households, 10,000 households earn $4 each, 4,000 households earn $2 each, 10,000 households earn $10 each, and the rest earn $1 each.What is the income share of the third quintile? (Not the cumulative income share, just the share of that quintile.) Please write down the answer with two decimal points in percentage form without the % sign. XX.xx, NOT XX.xx%arrow_forward
- Question 2: Migration In labour economics, we are often interested in migration of workers from one geographical region to another. Suppose we divide a hypothetical country Econland into three regions (R): R1, R2, R3. We can find the proportion of the workers of those three regions who put or migrate to another region. For instance, p12 = proportion of the workers in region 2 that move to region while p33 is the proportion of workers in region 3 who do not migrate to any of the two other regions. We can denote these transition proportions by pij , i, j = 1, 2, 3 and can state these proportions of workers that stay put or migrate to another region in terms of the transition matrix P =[p11 p12 p13 p21 p22 p23 p31 p32 p33] Suppose the number of workers in these regions in millions at a point in time t is denoted by (xti) and presented in the vector xt =[xt1…arrow_forwardIf in 2009 Indonesia had a Gini index of income distribution of 36.8 and Brazil had a Gini index of 53.9 this means: Select one: That the income distribution was more equal in Brazil than in Indonesia.. That 36.8% of the population in Indonesia and 53.9% of the population in Brazil had an income that was below the average off their respective country. That only 36.87% of the population in Indonesia and 53.97% of the population in Brazil participate in the income redistribution policies of their respective country. O c. Od. That the income distribution was more equal in Indonesia than Brazil. O a. O b.arrow_forwardQuestion 12 The following income distribution data are for Lesotho: Quintile Lowest 10% Lowest 20% Second quintile Third quintile Fourth quintile Highest 20% Percent Share 2.2% 3.0% 7.2% 12.5% 21.0% 56.3% Explain how to find the Gini coefficient, graphically. (Hint: You might want to use labels on your graph). You should be able to draw a graph on your computer, save it as a graph, picture, or document, and upload that graph, picture, or document to your answer box. If you cannot do that, you can always draw a graph on paper, take a picture, and upload the picture to your answer box.arrow_forward
- How can we use data on the return to education to estimate how differences in education among countries contribute to differences in income among countries?arrow_forwardName three products for which subjectivediscretionary income might be a better predictor ofconsumption than actual income. Justify your answer.arrow_forwardhow to find the 90/10 income ratio?arrow_forward
- What consumption differences might you expect to observe between families characterized as underprivileged versus those whose income is average for its social class? Do you have a tendency to overestimate the class you are in? If so, why? If not, why?arrow_forwardOfficials in fluxemburg are concerned about the current level of income inequality in their country, where the highest quintile of families currently earns 60% of the country's income. The central government has income information on its citizenry, and they want you to help them interpret the data from a 15-year period. The following table gives data on how families have moved between income quintiles between the years shown. ral in the missing values in the distribution table for familles in Fluxemburg; then use the information in the table to answer the following questions. Income Distribution in 2007 (Percent) Third Quintile Fourth Quintile Lowest Quintile Income Distribution in 1992 Highest Quintile Second Quintile Highest Quintile Second Quintile Third Quintile Fourth Quintile Lowest Quintile 65 12 13 51 18 8 12 -0* 52 Looking at families in the lowest quintile of income in 1992 (bottom row), you can report that higher quintile of income distribution by 2007. 6 10 16 57 11 5 14 66…arrow_forwardWhy is an increase in income alone not sufficient in improving health and education objectives?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506893
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506725
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning