Concept explainers
The two-way table for the given situation may vary. One of the possible answers is given below:
To give: The two-way for the given situation.
To show: The obese smokers and obese non-smokers who are more likely to die earlier than people who are not obese.
To check: Whether the Simpson’s paradox holds good for the given situation.
Answer to Problem 6.26E
The two-way table for smokers is given below:
Obese | ||
Death | Yes | No |
Yes | 8 | 57 |
No | 192 | 1,443 |
Total | 200 | 1,500 |
The two-way table for non-smokers is given below:
Obese | ||
Death | Yes | No |
Yes | 8 | 6 |
No | 592 | 594 |
Total | 600 | 600 |
The result tells that 4% of obese smokers had died, 1.3% of obese non-smokers had died. However, only 3.8% of not obese smokers had died and 1% of not obese non-smokers had died.
The Simpson’s paradox holds good for the given situation because the two individual tables tell that obese people are more prone to death but the combined table tells that non-obese people who are smoking are more prone to death.
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
Two-way table can be constructed using obese (yes or no) and death (yes or no) for smokers and non-smokers. Also, combine the two-way table of smokers and non-smokers with respect to obese and death.
Calculation:
The two-way table for smokers is constructed by taking death as a row variable and obese as a column variable.
The two-way table for smokers is given below:
Table 1
Obese | ||
Death | Yes | No |
Yes | 8 | 57 |
No | 192 | 1,443 |
Total | 200 | 1,500 |
The two-way table for non-smokers is given below:
Table 2
Obese | ||
Death | Yes | No |
Yes | 8 | 6 |
No | 592 | 594 |
Total | 600 | 600 |
Percentage of obese smokers who died is given below:
Thus, 4% of obese smokers had died.
Percentage of obese nonsmokers who died is given below:
Thus, 1.3% of obese non-smokers had died.
Percentage of not obese smokers who died is given below:
Thus, 3.8% of not obese smokers had died.
Percentage of non-smokers who are not obese died is given below:
Thus, 1% of not obese non-smokers had died.
Combined table:
The combined table is obtained by combining the corresponding values from Table 1 and Table 2.
Table 3
Obese | ||
Death | Yes | No |
Yes | 16 | 63 |
No | 784 | 2,037 |
Total | 800 | 2,100 |
Percentage of non-obese smokers who died is given below:
Thus, 3% of non-obese smokers had died.
Percentage of obese smokers who died is given below:
Thus, 2% of obese smokers had died.
The percentage of deaths for smokers is given below:
Obese | ||
Death | Yes | No |
Yes | 4% | 3.8% |
The percentage of deaths for non-smokers is given below:
Obese | ||
Death | Yes | No |
Yes | 1.3% | 1% |
The percentage of deaths under combined table is given below:
Obese | ||
Death | Yes | No |
Yes | 2% | 3% |
Justification:
Simpson paradox:
Conclusion drawn from aggregated table might go wrong by drawing conclusions from the individual tables.
Thus, the scenario of Simpson’s paradox is stated. The individual tables tell that obese people are more prone to death, but the combined table tells that non-obese people who are smoking are more prone to death.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 6 Solutions
EBK THE BASIC PRACTICE OF STATISTICS
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman