Case summary: The hotel W prohibited smoking in the room but invited guests to step out onto the balcony to smoke. The person T, who was a guest in one of the rooms, stepped out and fell to her death. The person P, the estate personal representative of the person T, filed a suit against the hotel W.
To find: The breach of duty of care by the hotel W.
Case summary: The hotel W prohibited smoking in the room but invited guests to step out onto the balcony to smoke. The person T, who was a guest in one of the rooms, stepped out and fell to her death. The person P, the estate personal representative of the person T, filed a suit against the hotel W.
To find: The possible defense claims by the hotel W.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 6 Solutions
Bundle: The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th + Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card
- "Warranties.Harold Moore bought a barrel-racing horse named Clear Boggy for $100,000 for his daugh-ter. The seller was Betty Roper, who appraises barrel-racing horses. (Barrel racing is a rodeo event in which a horse and rider attempt to complete a cloverleaf pattern around preset barrels in the fastest time.) Clear Boggy was promoted for sale as a competitive barrel-racing horse. On inquiry, Roper repre-sented that Clear Boggy did not have any performance issues or medical problems, and that the only medications the horse had been given were hock injections, a common treatment.Shortly after the purchase, Clear Boggy began exhibiting significant performance problems, including nervousness, unwillingness to practice, and stalling during runs. Roper then disclosed that the horse had been given shoulder injec-tions prior to the sale and had previously stalled in competi-tion. Moore took the horse to a veterinarian and discovered that it suffered from arthritis, impinged vertebrae,…arrow_forwardThe essential elements of a negligence action do not include which of the following? Question 5Answer a. There was little attempt to assist the victim b. A duty of care existed c. The act caused the injury d. There was no contributory negligence e. Injury or damage was reasonably foreseeablearrow_forward6arrow_forward
- FAMILY OF KUGA VICTIM TO BRING CLASS-ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST FORDThe family of Reshall Jimmy, who died when his Ford Kuga burst into flames, will be pursuinga class-action lawsuit against the vehicle manufacturer. The family’s lawyer, Rod Montano,announced the expected lawsuit during a briefing at the National Press Club on Tuesday(January 17, 2017). Ford announced on Monday that it was recalling the vehicles. In December2015, the automaker released a statement after several Kuga’s caught fire. It notified ownersthat it was investigating reports of engine fires in that model and asked them to take theirvehicle to their dealer for a maintenance check.Still no closureFord has come up with excuses to protect their brand instead of giving the family closure, saysa relative of Reshall Jimmy, who died when his Ford Kuga caught fire in December 2015.Rushall's brother, Kaveen Jimmy said on Monday following Ford’s press briefing in Pretoria:“They have not been doing the right thing… all of the…arrow_forwardFAMILY OF KUGA VICTIM TO BRING CLASS-ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST FORDThe family of Reshall Jimmy, who died when his Ford Kuga burst into flames, will be pursuinga class-action lawsuit against the vehicle manufacturer. The family’s lawyer, Rod Montano,announced the expected lawsuit during a briefing at the National Press Club on Tuesday(January 17, 2017). Ford announced on Monday that it was recalling the vehicles. In December2015, the automaker released a statement after several Kuga’s caught fire. It notified ownersthat it was investigating reports of engine fires in that model and asked them to take theirvehicle to their dealer for a maintenance check.Still no closureFord has come up with excuses to protect their brand instead of giving the family closure, saysa relative of Reshall Jimmy, who died when his Ford Kuga caught fire in December 2015.Rushall's brother, Kaveen Jimmy said on Monday following Ford’s press briefing in Pretoria:“They have not been doing the right thing… all of the…arrow_forwardFailure to mitigate damages limits recovery to: Question 30 options: damages that would have been sustained had the plaintiff mitigated the damages where it was possible to do so. nominal damages and punitive damages. damages for consequential loss. exemplary damages.arrow_forward
- irac method for Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committeearrow_forward27. Vicarious liability refers to a situation where: the employer is held legally responsible for actions of its employees the employer serves alcohol at company-sponsored events the onus is on the employer to prove it was not negligent none of the abovearrow_forwardSelect all that apply. A customer brought a bottle of wine to have with their dinner at a BYOW (Bring Your Own Wine) restaurant, but drank only half. Under what conditions can the restaurant allow the customer to remove the remaining wine from the premises? The bottle is resealed by the restaurant with a cork, flush with the top of the bottle. The wine is homemade. The restaurant cannot allow the remaining wine to be removed from the premises. The customer is not intoxicated. SUBMIT ENG 451 PM SADOarrow_forward
- 5-3 PROXIMATE CAUSE. Galen Stoller was killed at a railroad crossing when a train hit his car. The crossing was marked with a stop sign and a railroad-crossing symbol. The sign was not obstructed by vegetation, but there were no flashing lights. Galen’s parents filed a suit against Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad Corp. The plaintiffs accused the defendant of negligence in the design and maintenance of the crossing. The defendant argued that Galen had not stopped at the stop sign. Was the railroad negligent? What was the proximate cause of the accident? Discuss. [Henderson v. National Railroad Passenger Corp., __ F.3d __ (10th Cir. 2011)] (See Negligence.)arrow_forwardcoinsurance provision may be included in which of the following types of poses Accidental Death and Dismemberment Major Medical Hospital Indemnity Disability Incomo ●B ODarrow_forwardSara has a cute cuddly black bear cub. While letting the cub sit in the neighbor kid's lap, the playful cub accidentally scratches the kid's face requiring stitches. Sara is probably: Question 10 options: A) not liable, assumption of the risk. B) liable, strict liability. C) liable, she was clearly negligent. D) not liable, the kid consented to hold the cub.arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education