
Concept explainers
Answer 1:
Variable Costing: In this method, those costs which vary directly with production are considered in unit product cost. Fixed Manufacturing Expenses are treated as period cost and not product cost. Selling Expenses (since they do not vary with production), both variable and fixed, are charged off completely in the period in which the expenses get incurred.
Absorption Costing: In this method, those costs which vary directly with production are considered in unit product cost. Also, fixed Manufacturing Expenses are treated as product cost only. Selling Expenses (since they do not vary with production), both variable and fixed, are charged off completely in the period in which the expenses get incurred.
Unit product Cost under variable costing and absorption costing.
Answer 1:

Answer to Problem 22P
Solution:
Computation of Unit Product Cost under Variable Costing | ||
July | August | |
Direct Material | $ 7 | $ 7 |
Direct Labour | $ 10 | $ 10 |
Variable Manufacturing |
$ 5 | $ 5 |
Total Product Cost | $ 22 | $ 22 |
Computation of Unit Product Cost under Absorption Costing | ||
July | August | |
Direct Material | $ 7 | $ 7 |
Direct Labour | $ 10 | $ 10 |
Variable Manufacturing Overhead | $ 5 | $ 5 |
Fixed Manufacturing Overhead | $ 18 | $ 18 |
Total Product Cost | $ 40 | $ 40 |
Explanation of Solution
- In variable costing, direct material, direct labor and variable manufacturing expenses are considered for unit product cost;
- In absorption costing, direct material, direct labor, variable manufacturing expenses and fixed
manufacturing cost per unit are considered for unit product cost; - Fixed cost per unit is computed as Total manufacturing fixed cost/ Production quantity.
- Given:
Direct Material, Direct Labor and overhead costs are given in the question.
- Formulas:
- Calculation:
Unit Product cost under variable cost for July and August is $ 22 per unit and under absorption costing, it is $ 40 per unit for both July and August.
Answer 2:
Contribution format Income Statement: This is a statement prepared to assess net operating margin of a company.
Income Statements in Variable costing
Answer 2:

Answer to Problem 22P
Solution:
Denton Company
Income Statement (Contribution Format) |
July | August | |
Sales (A) | $ 900,000 | $ 1,200,000 |
Cost of Goods Sold (B) | $ 330,000 | $ 440,000 |
Variable selling and administrative expenses (C) | $ 45,000 | $ 60,000 |
Contribution Margin (D = A − B − C) | $ 525,000 | $ 700,000 |
Fixed Expenses (Manufacturing + Selling) (E) | $ 560,000 | $ 560,000 |
Net Operating Income (D − E) | $ (35,000) | $ 140,000 |
Explanation of Solution
- Given:
- Formulas:
- Calculation:
Sales value, Variable selling expenses per unit
Net Operating Income for July is $ (35,000) and for August is $ 140,000 ’
Answer 3
Reconciliation: Reconciliation is done between Net Operating Income as per Variable Costing and that as per Absorption Costing.
The difference between the two net operating income figures would be on account of fixed cost element on inventory.
Under Variable costing, the inventory is valued at Unit product cost as per variable costing method which is direct material plus direct labour plus variable manufacturing expenses whereas under Absorption costing, the inventory is valued at Unit product cost as per absorption costing method which is direct material plus direct labour plus variable manufacturing expenses plus fixed cost per unit.
Due to the inclusion of fixed cost in inventory in absorption costing, following is the impact:
- Opening inventory is higher resulting in decrease in profit
- Closing inventory is higher resulting in increase in profit
Reconciliation of net operating income under variable and absorption costing
Answer 3

Answer to Problem 22P
Solution:
Reconciliation | |||
July | August | ||
Net Operating Income as per Variable Costing | $ (35,000) | $ 140,000 | |
Closing Stock | 2,500 | - | |
Opening Stock | - | 2,500 | |
Difference in Stock (Closing - Opening) | 2,500 | (2,500) | |
Fixed Overhead per unit | $ 18 | $ 18 | |
Fixed Overhead on Difference Stock | 45,000 | (45,000) | |
Profit as per Absorption Costing | $ 10,000 | $ 95,000 |
Explanation of Solution
- Given:
Net operating income, stock, fixed overhead per unit under variable costing have been taken from computations made above.
- Calculation:
- Net operating income under variable costing is taken as a base;
- Difference of stock quantity is computed as closing stock less opening stock
- This difference in stock is multiplied with fixed overhead per unit (which is considered in unit product cost under absorption costing system). This will the amount of fixed overhead which has been deferred over to the next period;
- In year 1, there is no opening stock but there is closing stock, As such, profit under absorption costing is higher (high closing stock increases profit)
- In year 2, there is opening stock but there is no closing stock, As such, profit under absorption costing is lower (high opening stock decreases profit)
Answer 4
Correctness of break-even point
Answer 4

Answer to Problem 22P
Solution:
Break-even point computed here is 16,000 units. Here, fixed manufacturing expenses have been considered as fixed cost only i.e. period cost. As such, this Break-even point can be used in Variable Costing.
In variable costing, the results are as under:
July | August | |
Net Operating Income | $ (35,000) | $ 140,000 |
Sales Quantity | 15,000 | 20,000 |
Break-even sales quantity | 16000 | 16000 |
Difference in quantity (Actual - Breakeven) | (1,000) | 4,000 |
Contribution per unit | $ 35 | $ 35 |
Total contribution of difference quantity | $ (35,000) | $ 140,000 |
Total contribution is equal to Net operating Income under variable costing.
Explanation of Solution
Given:
Break-even point is given as 16,000 units
Profit under absorption costing is given as $ 10,000
Net operating income, sales quantity has been taken from computation in previous solutions.
Hence, the break-even point of 16,000 units is correct and is applicable under Variable Costing.
Also, the profit of $ 10,000 is correct under absorption costing.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 6 Solutions
Loose Leaf for Managerial Accounting
- Can you solve this financial accounting problem with appropriate steps and explanations?arrow_forwardPlease provide the answer to this financial accounting question using the right approach.arrow_forwardOn January 1, 2024, Sunfish Co. issued a $22 million, 8%, 6-year convertible bond with annual coupon payments. Each $1,000 bond was convertible into 35 shares of Sunfish's common shares. Shark Investments purchased the entire bond issue for $22.7 million on January 1, 2024. Shark estimated that without the conversion feature, the bonds would have sold for $21,013,098 (to yield 9%). On January 1, 2025, Shark converted bonds with a par value of $8.8 million. At the time of conversion, the shares were selling at $30 each. Required Prepare the journal entry to record the issuance of convertible bonds. Prepare the journal entry to record the conversion according to IFRS (book value method). Prepare the journal entry to record the conversion according ASPE (market value method).arrow_forward
- RoseBud Motel Ltd. (RM) had 100,000 ordinary shares outstanding during all of 2025, all owned by the owner Johnny Rose. In 2023, RM issued $500,000, 3% non-cumulative preferred shares. Each $100 preferred share is convertible into one ordinary share. RM also had 6,000, $100 cumulative preferred shares outstanding that are each entitled to an annual dividend of $1.60. Each preferred share is convertible into two ordinary shares. RM’s net income for the year ended December 31, 2025, was $400,000. Its income tax rate was 20%. The annual dividend was declared and paid during 2025 on the cumulative preferred shares but not on the non-cumulative shares. Required Calculate RM’s basic EPS for 2025. Are the non-cumulative convertible preferred shares dilutive or antidilutive in nature? The cumulative convertible preferred shares? Support your answer with calculations. Calculate RM’s diluted EPS for 2025.arrow_forwardGive correct answer this general accounting questionarrow_forwardHogwarts Inc. (HI) had 80,000 ordinary shares outstanding on January 1, 2025. Transactions throughout 2025 affecting its shareholdings follow. February 1: HI issued 200,000, $10, cumulative 10% preferred shares. March 1: HI issued 40,000 ordinary shares. April l: HI declared and issued an 8% stock dividend on the ordinary shares. July 1: HI repurchased and cancelled 30,000 ordinary shares. October 1: HI declared and issued a 3-for-l stock split on the ordinary shares. December 31: HI declared $99,600 in dividends on the ordinary shares. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2025, was $600,000. Its tax rate was 40%. Required What was the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding in 2025? What was the basic EPS in 2025? If the preferred shares issued on February 1, 2025, were non-cumulative, what would basic EPS for 2025 have been?arrow_forward
- AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337272094Author:WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Accounting Information SystemsAccountingISBN:9781337619202Author:Hall, James A.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
- Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis...AccountingISBN:9780134475585Author:Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. RajanPublisher:PEARSONIntermediate AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259722660Author:J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M ThomasPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationFinancial and Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259726705Author:John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting PrinciplesPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





