Case summary: The person E went to the resort RM in New Hampshire with a friend. The person E went snow tubing. There were no employees of resort RM present to instruct person E about the careful use of a snow tube. The person E got injured while she was snow tubing. The person E filed a negligence action against the resort RM for the compensation of her injury.
To explain: Probable defense that will be asserted by the resort RM.
Explanation of Solution
The resort RM will assert the defense of the assumption of risk. The assumption of risk is very common and foreseeable by the person who performs risky sports. As per the matter of fact, the person E, with the knowledge of the risk, voluntarily went skiing and got themselves injured by colliding with another snow tuber. The defense of assumption of the risk is solidified by the state statute. Hence, the resort RM is not liable for compensatory damages to the person E.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 6 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
- Barbara Rome entered Flower Memorial Hospital to undergo a series of X-rays. When she was ready for the X-rays, she was assisted by a student radiological intern. The intern placed Rome on the X-ray table and strapped her onto the table correctly; however, the intern did not properly fasten the footboard, which was located at the foot of the table. As a result of this error, Rome fell and was hurt when the table was raised. As a consequence, Rome brought a lawsuit against Flower Memorial Hospital, alleging that the ordinary negligence of the intern had caused her injury. In contrast, the hospital argued that the lawsuit involved a medical claim, as defined under the state’s medical malpractice statute. Whether a case involves ordinary negligence or a medical claim would determine whether the state’s two-year statute of limitations for negligence or the state’s one-year statute of limitations for medical claims would apply. This case clearly involves a difference of opinion on the…arrow_forwardNegligence CaseWest v. East Tennessee Pioneer Oil Co.In Knox County Tennessee, a convenience store clerk refused to sell Brian Taver beer because he wasalready intoxicated. However, the clerk eventually activated the gas pump and, with the assistance of twoadditional store employees, who helped Taver operate the pump, Taver was able to purchase a small amount ofgas.Taver then drove off, going the wrong way on the highway and without his headlights on. Shortlyafterward, he crashed into an oncoming car, injuring Gary West and Michelle Richardson.West suffered several fractures of his legs, a head injury, and a broken elbow. West works in theconstruction industry. West, who has basic health insurance provided by his employer, was left with over$200,000 in personal debt as a consequence of the accident. Richardson suffered a severe closed-head injury.Richardson is an administrative assistant for the state of Tennessee. Her employer provided betterhealth insurance coverage, so she did not…arrow_forwardBusiness Tort of Negligence Dewayne, a driver for Speedy Delivery Company, leaves the truck's motor running in neutral and carelessly forgets to set the parking brake while making a delivery. The truck rolls and crashes into a nearby gas station pump, igniting a fire that spreads quickly to a construction site a block away. A burned wall collapses onto a crane, which falls on Fazio, a bystander, and injures him. What must Fazio show to recover damages from Speedy Delivery? If you are the attorney for Speedy Delivery what would be your best defense argument? Your paper should be between 500-750 words, with at least two cited external resources. View your assignment rubric. ROLK LOVEarrow_forward
- Answer pleasearrow_forwardPacific Southern Airlines (PSA) had an unhappy customer. Cynthia Mercier-Walters flew from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to Phoenix, Arizona. The flight stopped briefly at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, where she got off the plane for half an hour. When she returned to her seat, her $400 prescription reading glasses were gone. She asked the flight attendant where the glasses were, and the attendant said they probably were thrown away since the cleaning crew had come in with big bags and tossed everything in them. Ms. Mercier-Walters tried to locate the glasses through the airline’s lost-and-found service, but she failed. Then she wrote a strong letter to the airline demanding reimbursement for the loss. She felt that it was obvious that she was returning to her seat. The airline, however, knows that an overwhelming number of passengers arriving at hubs switch planes for their connecting flights. The airline does not know who is returning. What’s more, flight attendants…arrow_forwardHomer Simpson is operating his car at around Noon yesterday. He is stopped for a red-light at the corner of Fast Food Boulevard and 257th Street, on his way to get a burger from Krusty Burger in the Fast Food District of Springfield, Florida, located in Polk County, when Barney Gumble, operating a 1982 Ford Pinto, fails to stop in time and drives into the back of Homer’s vehicle. Homer sustains serious injuries to his back, neck, and to his face when it struck the steering wheel. He is taken to Springfield General Hospital and is admitted and treated there for three weeks. After his release from the hospital, he misses another three weeks from work at the Springfield Nuclear Power Plant while recuperating at home. Gumble is uninjured from the crash. He is given a breathalyzer test and his Blood Alcohol Count registers at .22% BAC. The legal limit for BAC while operating a motor vehicle in Florida is 0.08%. Because Barney has a prior conviction for misdemeanor Driving Under the…arrow_forward
- 27. Vicarious liability refers to a situation where: the employer is held legally responsible for actions of its employees the employer serves alcohol at company-sponsored events the onus is on the employer to prove it was not negligent none of the abovearrow_forwardBill Estes works at Clifford Company in the central receiving department. He unpacks incoming shipments and verifies goods received. Over the weekend, Bob pulled a muscle in his back while playing baseball. When he came to work on Monday and started unpacking shipments, he started to hurt again. Bob called the human resource department and told them he got hurt lifting a package at work. He was told to fill out an accident report and send it to an orthopedic clinic with a workers' compensation form. The doctor at the clinic told Bob not to lifting for about two and stay home for at least one week. Is Bob entitled to workers' compensation? Why or Why no? What effect will Bob's claim have on Cliffrock Company's Workers' Compensation Insurance Premium? Write a short memo from the human resource department to Cliffrocks Company employees explaining the purpose of workers' compensation. In small groups discuss the job-related illness or injury risks of a computer input operator and…arrow_forwardA woman shopper was injured when she slipped on the tiled foyer of a supermarket, which was wet after rain. The defendant argued that it wasn’t responsible for the slippery condition of the floor, and that it owed no general duty of care in negligence. As it had mopped the floor to minimise danger to customers, there was no unusual danger that would give rise to a strict liability on the occupier. How do you think a court might assess the defendant’s claim of no liability?arrow_forward
- 5-3 PROXIMATE CAUSE. Galen Stoller was killed at a railroad crossing when a train hit his car. The crossing was marked with a stop sign and a railroad-crossing symbol. The sign was not obstructed by vegetation, but there were no flashing lights. Galen’s parents filed a suit against Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad Corp. The plaintiffs accused the defendant of negligence in the design and maintenance of the crossing. The defendant argued that Galen had not stopped at the stop sign. Was the railroad negligent? What was the proximate cause of the accident? Discuss. [Henderson v. National Railroad Passenger Corp., __ F.3d __ (10th Cir. 2011)] (See Negligence.)arrow_forwardWilliam Brill a truck driver, had just delivered lumber to Queens lumber. As he was returning to his truck he was hit by a forklift driven bv an employee eric vigil. After sustaining serious injuries, Brill sued both Queens Lumber and Vigil for negligence. What elements does brill have to prove to establish negligence? In general, what duty does a driver of a motor vehicle have to pedestrians? On what theory of liability could Queens Lumber be found negligent? Would the result be the same if Brill had failed to look both ways before walking back to his truck? Brill v Queens lumber Co.arrow_forwardA gasoline-powered lawn mower that had been used earlier to cut grass was left unattended next to a water heater that had been manufactured by Sears. Expert testimony was presented to demonstrate that vapors from the mower’s gas tank accumulated under the water heater and resulted in an explosion. Three-year-old Shawn Toups was injured as a result. Evidence was also presented negating any claim that Shawn had been handling the gasoline can located nearby or the lawn mower. He was not burned on the soles of his feet or the palms of his hands, and, similarly, the gas can remained in an upright position even after the explosion. Is Sears liable to the Toups in strict product liability? Explain.arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education