Check the statement: Hospital admission rate has dropped in the past two decades is true or false.
Explanation of Solution
It is true that the hospital admission rate has dropped in the past two decades. This is due to the increase in the US population. The US population faces an increase from 230 million (1981) to above 320 million in 2016. Also, the middle age for the people rises from 30 to 37 from 1981 to 2016. The annual number of admissions to the US hospital can be illustrated as follows:
According to the data, it shows a decline tendency in the hospitalization after the implementation of Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs). The annual number of admissions to U.S hospital on 2011 is nearly 35 million and going onward the number of hospital admission shows a decline and below 35 million.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- Below is the abstract of a recentNational Bureau of Economic Research working paper entitled “Can governments do it better? Merger mania and hospital outcomes in the English NHS” by Martin Gaynor, Mauro Laudicella, and Carol Propper (2011). The literature on mergers between private hospitals suggests that such mergers often produce little benefit. Despite this, the UK government has pursued an active policy of hospital mergers. These mergers are initiated by a regulator, acting on behalf of the public, and justified on the grounds that merger will improve outcomes. We examine whether this promise is met. We exploit the fact that between 1997 and 2006 in England around half the short term general hospitals were involved in a merger, but that politics means that selection for a merger may be random with respect to future performance. We examine the impact of mergers on a large set of outcomes including financial performance, productivity, waiting times and clinical quality and find…arrow_forwardThe idea that hospital competition has led to a “medical arms race” can help explain why the U.S. has more than twice the OECD average number of MRI machines per 1,000,000 population. True Falsearrow_forwardIndicate whether each statement is true or false, and justify your answer.There is no such thing as “too much competition” in the private hospital market.arrow_forward
- Based on the data presented in the table below estimate elasticity of demand for two price changes: a) price increase from $3 to $9 per hour; and b) price decrease from $9 to $3 per hour. Make sure to use the single point elasticity equation formula. Price Per Hour of Therapy Demand for Therapy 0 16 1 15 2 14 3 13 4 12 10 5 11 6 10 7 9 8 8 9 7 10 6 11 5 12 4 13 3 14 2 15 1 16 0arrow_forwardKk.256.arrow_forwardIn some countries, such as Canada and UK, direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising for pharmaceutical products is illegal or tightly controlled. Which of the following is NOT a reason why DTC is tightly controlled? DTC have the potential to drive up spending on drugs and exacerbate moral hazard. DTC makes patients aware of new remedies. DTC can put a strain on doctor-patient relationship when patients demand some drugs that are not necessary or not the best options. Asymmetric information: consumers are not in a good position to determine if a drug is what they need.arrow_forward
- Indicate whether each statement is true or false, and justify your answer.Both ICERs and ACERs compare two drugs on the basis of both cost and medical efficacy.arrow_forwardDemand for medical services is price inelastic (Absolute value of price elasticity of demand is less than 1 and greater than zero). Medical services are different from most other goods and services in that the person who determines the demand (the patient) is not the person who makes the payment (payment is made by the insurance company). How does this affect the price elasticity of demand for medical services (increase it or decrease it)? You may assume that this question only refers to people who have health insurance. Ignore co-payments and deductibles and any other out-of-pocket expenses. Please give an explanation.arrow_forwardAccording to Gaynor, Laudicella, and Propper (2011), In the U.K., most hospitals are owned by the government, rather than privately held. In a setting where most hospitals are not owned by the government (such as in the U.S.), what effect do you predict that hospital mergers would have on the price of hospital care? Presumably, hospital mergers would lead to reduced competition and higher prices for any given type of care.arrow_forward
- Nonearrow_forwardIndicate whether the statement is true or false, and justify your answer.The average length of hospital stays in the US has remained flat after a sharp decline in the 1980s.arrow_forwardIndicate whether the statement is true or false, and justify your answer.In the RAND HIE, the arc elasticity of demand for inpatient care was larger (in absolute value) than the arc elasticity of demand for outpatient care.arrow_forward