EBK THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS:
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337516051
Author: Miller
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 6, Problem 1BS
Summary Introduction
Case summary: The person R is an employee of DC Corp. The owner D of DC Corp and the person R had a heated argument when D learned about a second accident caused by the person R in the last six months. He fired the person R and wrote a defamatory letter to the union. The person R sued D for libel.
To explain: The liability of the person D towards person R.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Paula Plaintiff owns Paula’s Boutique, one of the most popular stores in town. William Wicked owns the store next to Paula’s Boutique. William has been jealous of Paula’s success. William, in an effort to increase his own business, begins to tell his customers that Paula is dishonest and unethical. William even puts a sign in his front window warning potential customers not to shop at Paula’s Boutique because of her deceitful and unethical practices.
Paula is upset when she finds out what William has been doing. Paula has always been honest and ethical with her customers and now her business is suffering because of William’s dishonesty. Paula decides that something must be done about this situation.
What advice would you give Paula?
Discuss the possible tort claim Paula might have against William. Be sure to include the elements of the tort and relate those elements to the scenario.
If Paula decides to pursue a claim against William, should she consider a lawsuit, mediation, or…
Freddie is driving his motorcycle in a state in which helmet use is required by statute. Freddie is not wearing his helmet because it flattens his hair and he thinks he looks sexier without it. As Freddie is driving down the highway, a car driven by Renee pulls out directly in front of Freddie. Freddie runs into Renee's car and receives severe head injuries. Freddie sues Renee. What defenses, if any, can Renee assert?
Jason Lasseigne, a Little League baseball player, was seriously injured at a practice session when he was struck on the head by a poorly thrown baseball from a team member, Todd Landry. The league was organized by American Legion Post 38. Claude Cassel and Billy Johnson were the volunteer coaches of the practice session. The Lasseignes brought suit on behalf of Jason against Post 38, claiming that the coaching was negligent and that Post 38 was vicari- ously liable for the harm caused by such negligence. Post 38 contended that it had no right to control the work of the volunteer coaches or the manner in which practices were conducted and as a result should not be held vicariously liable for the actions of the coaches. Decide. Please answer is the IRAC format Issue: Call of the QuestionRule: Rule of Law to be applied to properly answer the questionAnalysis:…
Chapter 6 Solutions
EBK THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS:
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Thomas worked in the nonmilitary operations of a large firm that produced both military and nonmilitary goods. When the company discontinued the production of nonmilitary goods, Thomas was transferred to the plant producing military equipment. Thomas left his job, claiming that it violated his religious principles to participate in the manufacture of goods to be used in destroying life. In effect, he argued, the transfer to the military equipment plant forced him to quit his job. He was denied unemployment compensation by the state because he had not been effectively “discharged” by the employer but had voluntarily terminated his employment. Did the state’s denial of unemployment benefits to Thomas violate the free exercise clause of the First Amendment?arrow_forwardAfter meeting with a supervisee, the supervisor believes that one of the supervisee’s clients is in danger of harming herself. The supervisee disagrees, he believes that the client is not at risk and decides not to take any action, despite requests by the supervisor. The supervisor decides to contact the client herself and makes arrangements to have her committed to a psychiatric unit. Has the supervisee acted ethically? Professionally? Has the supervisor acted ethically? Professionally?arrow_forwardVida Tunu is sexually harassed by a top-level senior executive in a large company. She sues the company, and during settlement discussions, she is offered an extremely large monetary settlement. In the agreement, Vida Tunu is required to confirm that the executive did nothing wrong, and after the agreement is signed she is prohibited from discussing anything about the incident publicly. Before the date scheduled to sign the settlement agreement, Vida’s lawyer mentions that she has heard the executive has done this before, and the settlement amount is very large because the company probably had a legal obligation to dismiss the executive previously. The company however wants to keep the executive because he is a big money maker for the company.a) Explain the issues of integrity, ethics and law posed in the case study? b) Will it be morally right to dismiss the top-level senior executive who is a big money maker for the company? Provide examples of your choice to explain your answer…arrow_forward
- A statute requiring railroads to fence their tracks is construed as intended solely to prevent animals that stray onto the right-of-way from being hit by trains. B&A Railroad Company fails to fence its tracks. Two of Calvin’s cows wander onto the track. Nellie is hit by a train. Elsie is poisoned by weeds growing beside the track. For which cow(s), if any, is B&A Railroad Company liable to Calvin? Why?arrow_forwardConsider the given situation: David was walking through a subway station that was highly crowded. He took out his handgun and fired it randomly because he liked the sound made by the firing. Even though David has no intent to shot anyone in the crowd, the shot fired by him injured Susan. David will be held liable for which type of tort? a) Negligence b) Strict liability c) Intentional tort d) Recklessness Answer Submit O O O Oarrow_forwardThelma purchased a used truck from Hall that had been manufactured by International Harvester. To work on the truck engine, Thelma had to have the cab of the truck raised. When it was so raised, the cab fell unexpectedly and fatally injured Thelma. Suit was brought for her wrongful death against Hall and International Harvester. The suit was based on theories of negligence, strict tort liability, and breach of warranty. The defense was raised that there was no liability because the sale to Thelma had been made “as is” and the truck was a used truck. Were these defenses valid?arrow_forward
- Pablo, a resident of New Mexico, while driving through Arizona, was struck by an SUV driven by Derek, a resident of California. Derek was speeding when the accident happened, and Pablo suffered severe injuries that ruined a potential acting career. Pablo's damages are estimated at $200,000. What type of case is this?arrow_forwardAt Whirlpool’s manufacturing plant in Ohio, overhead conveyors transported household appliance components throughout the plant. A wire mesh screen was positioned below the conveyors to catch falling components and debris. Maintenance employees frequently had to stand on the screens to clean them. Whirlpool began installing heavier wire because several employees had fallen partly through the old screens, and one had fallen completely through to the plant floor. At this time, the company warned workers to walk only on the frames beneath the wire but not on the wire itself. Before the heavier wire had been completely installed, a worker fell to his death through the old screen. A short time after this incident, Deemer and Cornwell, two plant employees, met with the plant safety director to discuss the mesh, to voice their concerns, and to obtain the name, address, and telephone number of the local Occupational Safety and Health Administration representative. The next day, the two…arrow_forwardTitle VII covers acts of discrimination, but not retaliation. True Falsearrow_forward
- Immar Medrano was employed as a journeyman electrician by Marshall Electrical Contracting, Inc. (MEC), in Marshall, Missouri. Medrano attended an electrician apprenticeship night class at a community college in Sedalia, Missouri. MEC paid Medrano’s tuition and book fees. Attendance at the course required Medrano to drive 70 miles round-trip. One night, when Medrano was driving home from the class, a drunk driver crossed the center line of U.S. Highway 65 and collided head-on with Medrano’s automobile. Medrano died in the accident. His wife and two children filed a workers’ compensation claim for death benefits against MEC. Are Medrano’s actions at the time of the automobile accident within the course and scope of his employment, thus entitling him to workers’ compensation benefits? Explain your answer.arrow_forwardLucy cannot stand the fact that her ex-husband, Ethan, is about to get remarried. After all, it was a horrible breakup, and Ethan was really mean to her. Lucy decides to get her revenge by telling Ethan’s employer that Ethan stole large amounts of money from his previous employer, even though Lucy knows it is not true. If Lucy follows through on her plan, she will have: a) not committed the tort of defamation because the statement would not harm Ethan’s reputation. b) committed the tort of defamation because it is an untrue statement intended to harm Ethan’s reputation, and she stated it to another person. c) not committed the tort of defamation, because she only made the statement to one person.arrow_forwardJohn Clark purchased a paintball gun at a pawn shop and then participated in a community sport of shooting paintball guns at cars. While John and his friend were riding around their small town with their paintball guns, they spotted Chris and shot his car. Chris Rico then aimed his Brass Eagle paintball gun at the car John was riding in, but instead hit John in the eye. John required surgery on his eye that even- ing and filed suit against Brass Eagle under a theory of strict tort liability. Brass Eagle responded by stat- ing that its gun was not defective and that the young men had ignored warnings about the need to wear eye protection when using the guns. John said he purchased his gun used and was not given all the packaging and instructions. Brass Eagle says that its gun was not defective and that it functioned as it was supposed to. John says the guns are inherently dan- gerous. Who should be responsible for the injury? Are paintball guns defective if they can harm indivi- duals?…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education