Determining and Interpreting the Effects of Transactions on Income Statement Categories and Return on Assets (AP5-A)
Creative Technology, a computer hardware company based in Singapore, developed the mortem standard for computer sound cards in the early 1990s. Recently. Creative has released a line of portable audio products to directly compete with Apple's popular iPod. Presented here is a recent income statement (dollars in millions).
Net sales | $ 231 |
Costs and expenses | |
Cost of sales | 182 |
Research and development | 66 |
Selling, general, and administrative | 62 |
Operating income (loss) | (79) |
Interest and other income (expenses), net | 27 |
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes | (52) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | (5) |
Net income (loss) | S (47) |
The company’s beginning and ending assets were $403 and $342, respectively.
Required:
Listed here are hypothetical additional transactions. Assuming that they also occurred during the fiscal year, complete the following tabulation, indicating the sign of the effect of each additional transaction (+ tor increase, − for decrease, and NE tor no effect). Consider each item independently and ignore taxes. (Hint: Construct the
- a. Recorded sales on account of $400 and related cost of goods sold of $300.
- b. Incurred additional research and development expense of $100, which was paid in cash.
- c. Issued additional shares of common stock for $260 cash.
- d. Declared and paid dividends of $90.
Transaction | Gross Profit | Operating Income |
Return on Assets |
a. | |||
b. | |||
c. | |||
d. |
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 5 Solutions
Financial Accounting
- Comparative figures for Apple and Google follow. Apple One Year Current Year Prior $338,516 $ 365,725 260,174 265,595 $ millions Total assets Net sales Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. Apple Google Required: 1. Compute total asset turnover for the most recent two years for Apple and Google using the data shown. 2. In the current year, which company is more efficient in generating net sales given total assets? 3. Does asset turnover underperform or outperform the 0.5 industry asset turnover for (a) Apple and (b) Google? Total Asset Turnover Two Years Prior $375,319 229, 234 Current Year Required 1 Required 2 Required 3 Compute total asset turnover for the most recent two years for Apple and Google using the data shown. Note: Round your answers to 2 decimal places. 0.61 times times Current Year $ 275,909 161,857 One Year Prior times times Required 1 Google One Year Prior $ 232,792 136,819 Two Years Prior $ 197,295 110,855 Required 2 >arrow_forwardPfizer Inc. (PFE) discovers, produces, and distributes medicines, including Celebrex and Lipi-tor. Ford Motor Co. (F) develops, markets, and produces automobiles and trucks. Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) develops, produces, and distributes a variety of computer software and hardware products including Windows, Office, Excel, and the Xbox. 1. Without computing the return on assets, rank from highest to lowest Pfizer, Ford, and Microsoft in terms of their return on assets. 2. The following data (in millions) were taken from recent financial statements of each company: Pfizer Ford Net income ................................. Total assets at the beginning of the year...... Total assets at the end of the year ............ $ 21,979 154,229 181,476 $ 17,937 257,035 267,261 Microsoft $ 61,271 301,311 333,779 Compute the return on assets for each company using the preceding data, and rank the companies’ return on assets from highest to lowest. Round the return on assets to one decimal place. 3.…arrow_forwardRatio of Current Assets $875,000 to Current Liabilities $350,000 2.5:1. The firm wants to maintain Current Ratio of 2:1 by purchasing goods on credit. Compute amount of goods that should be purchased on Credit.arrow_forward
- Analyzing and Assessing Research and Development Expenses Agilent Technologies, Inc., the high-tech spin-off from Hewlett-Packard Company, reports the following operating profit for 2014 in its 10-K ($ millions): Net revenue Products $5,686 Services and other 1,295 Total net revenue 6,981 Costs and expenses Cost of products 2,673 Cost of services and other 715 Total costs 3,388 Research and development 719 Selling, general and administrative 2,043 Total costs and expenses 6,150 Income from operations $831 Required What percentage of its total net revenue is Agilent spending on research and development? Round to one decimal place.arrow_forwardP5-5A Profitability Analysis Kolby Enterprise reports the following information on its income statement: net sales 250,000, cost of goods sold 150,000, selling expenses 50,000, Administrative expenses 10,000, other income 15,000, other expense 10,000. Required Calculate Kolby's gross profit percentage and return on sales ratio. Explain what each ratio tells us about Kolby's performance. Kolby is planning to add a new product and expects net sales to be $45,000 and cost of goods to be 38,000. No other income or expand are expected to change. How will this affect Kolby's gross profit percentage and return on sales ratio? What do you advise regarding the new product offering?arrow_forwardNeed Answerarrow_forward
- In a common size financial statement, which of the following is given a percentage of 100 percent? Total liabilities Net income Net Sales Cost of goods sold MA MacBook Pro 57 W P # LEarrow_forwardHelping tags: Accounting management . . . . will UPVOTE, Just Pls help me answer #4 to #6 and show complete solutions. Thanks.arrow_forwardSubject:- accountingarrow_forward
- Cornerstones of Financial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337690881Author:Jay Rich, Jeff JonesPublisher:Cengage LearningFinancial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337272124Author:Carl Warren, James M. Reeve, Jonathan DuchacPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Financial And Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337902663Author:WARREN, Carl S.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Financial Reporting, Financial Statement Analysis...FinanceISBN:9781285190907Author:James M. Wahlen, Stephen P. Baginski, Mark BradshawPublisher:Cengage Learning