Macroeconomics
Macroeconomics
21st Edition
ISBN: 9781259915673
Author: Campbell R. McConnell, Stanley L. Brue, Sean Masaki Flynn Dr.
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 5, Problem 3P

Sub part (a):

To determine

The Bribe income.

Sub part (a):

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Bribing takes place when the individuals corrupts an official and make him favorable towards them. People use money or other valuable assets or materials to convince the official and make him issue the laws favorable to them.

The bribes cost $1,000 each. There are 52 weeks in a year in which bribing needs to done. The officer visits 2 houses in a week. Thus, the amount that the officer makes through bribing can be calculated by multiplying the total weeks with the number of visits per week and the amount received per bribe. This can be done as follows:

Total amount made by officer=No. of weeks×No. of times per week×amount per bribe=52×2×1,000=104,000

Thus, the amount made by the officer through the bribing is $104,000.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Bribing: It is a practice of providing money or such material benefits to the officials in order to make the person being corrupted in favor of the bribing person.

Sub part (b):

To determine

The Bribe income.

Sub part (b):

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The number of housing inspectors is 20. Each of them provides half of their bribe to the construction supervisor. The amount made by the housing inspectors annually is $104,000.

Thus, the amount that the construction supervisor received can be calculated as follows:

Amount made by construction supervisor=(Amount made by per housing inspector×No.of inspectors×Percentage that the inspectors gives )=104,000×20×0.5=1,040,000

Thus, the construction supervisor makes $1,040,000 per year.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Bribing: It is a practice of providing money or such material benefits to the officials in order to make the person being corrupted in favor of the bribing person.

Sub part (c):

To determine

The Bribe income.

Sub part (c):

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The Number of housing inspectors decreases from 20 to 10. The amount of bribe increases to $2,500 from $1,000. There are 52 weeks, 2 house visits per week and the inspectors gives 50 percent of the bribe to the construction supervisor.

The amount that the inspector makes per year through bribing can be calculated as follows:

Total amount made by officer=No. of weeks×No. of times per week×amount per bribe=52×2×2,500=260,000

Thus, the amount made by the officer through the bribing is $260,000.

Thus, the amount that the construction supervisor received can be calculated as follows:

Amount made bt construction supervisor=(Amount made by per housing inspector×No.of inspectors×Percentage that the inspectors gives )=260,000×10×0.5=1,300,000

Thus, the construction supervisor makes $1,300,000 per year.

The amount received by the construction supervisor in part b was only $1,040,000. But, in this case, it is $1,300,000. The difference in the amount received by the supervisor can be calculated by subtracting the old amount from the new amount as follows:

Difference in amount received by supervisor=New amountold amount=1,300,0001,040,000=260,000

Thus, the construction supervisor will earn $260,000 more than in part b income.

Since, the amount received by the construction supervisor is increased even with the decline in the number of inspectors, the construction supervisor will be happier with it.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Bribing: It is a practice of providing money or such material benefits to the officials in order to make the person being corrupted in favor of the bribing person.

Sub part (d):

To determine

The Bribe income.

Sub part (d):

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The number of housing inspectors decreases from 20 to 10. The amount of bribe increases to $1,500 from $1,000. There are 52 weeks, 2 house visits per week and the inspectors give 50 percent of the bribe to the construction supervisor.

The amount that the inspector makes per year through bribing can be calculated as follows:

Total amount made by officer=No. of weeks×No. of times per week×amount per bribe=52×2×1,500=156,000

Thus, the amount made by the officer through the bribing is $156,000.

Thus, the amount that the construction supervisor receives can be calculated as follows:

Amount made bt construction supervisor=(Amount made by per housing inspector×No.of inspectors×Percentage that the inspectors gives )=156,000×10×0.5=780,000

Thus, the construction supervisor makes $780,000 per year.

The amount received by the construction supervisor in part b was $1,040,000. But, in this case, it is only $780,000. The difference in the amount received by the supervisor can be calculated by subtracting the new amount from the previous amount as follows:

Difference in amount received by supervisor=old amountNew amount=1,040,000780,000=260,000

Thus, the construction supervisor will earn $260,000 less than in part b income.

Since the amount received by the construction supervisor is decreased with the decline in the number of inspectors, he will be unhappy.

Thus, he desires to use 20 housing inspectors again.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Bribing: It is a practice of providing money or such material benefits to the officials in order to make the person being corrupted in favor of the bribing person.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
The table below shows pizza topping preferences for Marcus, Dakota, and Austin, and that each individual has strictly transitive preferences. Suppose that three individuals make up our "society." In this society, prefer pepperoni to cheese pizza; _prefer cheese to supreme; and prefer supreme to pepperoni. This example illustrates that _ Person Marcus Dakota Austin 0000 First Preference Pepperoni Supreme Cheese Second Preference Cheese Pepperoni Supreme Third Preference Supreme Cheese Pepperoni two-thirds; two-thirds; two-thirds; even if individuals' preferences might satisfy the transitive property, societal preferences may not. two-thirds; two-thirds; everyone; if individuals' preferences satisfy the transitive property, societal preferences must also. two-thirds; two-thirds; everyone; even if individuals' preferences might satisfy the transitive property, societal preferences may not. two-thirds; two-thirds; two-thirds; if individuals' preferences satisfy the transitive property,…
Consider the table below, which has data on insurance status and medical expenditures for different types of professors at Hypothetical University (HU), economics & criminology professors. Assume that there are an equal number of economics and criminology professors. Assume further that econ professors all have the same level of health and criminology professors all have the same level of health. In 2020, every professor was offered a full insurance contract with no premium. In 2021, HU charged any employee who wanted to keep health insurance the actuarially fair premium based on 2020 expenditures. This premium would be equal to and, as a result,professors dropped their coverage in 2021. _ 2020 2021 Insured? Avg. Expenditures Insured? Avg. Expenditures Economics Professors Criminology Professors Yes Yes $25,000 $15,000 000000 $15,000; criminology $25,000; econ $20,000; econ $15,000; econ $20,000; criminology $25,000; criminology ??? $28,000 ??? $10,000
Consider the table below, which has data on insurance status and medical expenditures for different types of professors at Hypothetical University (HU), economics & criminology professors. Assume that there are an equal number of economics and criminology professors. Assume further that econ professors all have the same level of health and criminology professors all have the same level of health. There is evidence of 2021 Insured? Avg. Expenditures Insured? Avg. Expenditures 2020 Economics Professors Criminology Professors Yes. Yes $25,000 $15,000 0000 ??? ??? $28,000 $10,000 I. moral hazard because in 2021 criminology professors dropped their coverage and health expenditures went down. II. adverse selection because in response to rising premiums after 2020, the professors with lower health expenditure dropped coverage Both I and II neither I nor II
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Economics:
Economics
ISBN:9781285859460
Author:BOYES, William
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506893
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506756
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506725
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Principles of Economics 2e
Economics
ISBN:9781947172364
Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:OpenStax