Concept introduction Skinner proposed that individual behavior, and society as a whole, could be designed and controled using the principles of operant conditioning (i.e., reinforcements and punishments).

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 5, Problem 1CTQ-204

Summary Introduction

Concept introduction

Skinner proposed that individual behavior, and society as a whole, could be designed and controled using the principles of operant conditioning (i.e., reinforcements and punishments).

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

There are both pros and cons to consider when imagining a Skinner society. To Skinner, the ability to control human behavior by controlling the environment would lead to a future filled with happy citizens and socially desirable outcomes. Such a society could be safer, cleaner, and more productive. Individuals in Skinner’s society could be more educated, charitable, kind, and motivated to achieve the same goals. The harmful notions of racism and sexism could be eliminated by punishing these ideas and reinforcing the ideals of human equality. Additionally, stigmatization of certain individuals, for example substance users, could be reduced or even eliminated if society viewed the environment as the problem, rather than assigning personal blame to these individuals. At the same time, however, it is also important to consider the potential costs of such a society. Individualism may become limited, if everyone is conditioned to believe in and work toward the same ideals. Additionally, who would decide on what gets reinforced or punished? Creating “universal” ideals could lead to totalitarian control, with society being controlled by a few people in power. Additionally, in a world defined by operant conditioning, people may develop a sort of apathy, or learned helplessness, if they believe that they have no power over their lives and that it is their environment that defines them. This lack of personal responsibility may be damaging to individuals’ sense of identity and their motivation. In this thought experiment, there are both positive and negative possibilities to consider at both the level of society and the individual.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Based on the Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision Model (see module 2 learning folder), when would you use a Paired Stimulus versus a MSWO? The Peer Feedback Form in module 2 provides a glimpse of an individuals’ performance in a group setting. How can you graph the Peer Feedback Form so that it can be used to measure individual performance in a group format for 8 weeks? A group member shows a decreasing trend in preparation across 3 sessions. Draw a graph that shows this performance. The Group Productivity Check-in is an example of the Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS). The rating scale has the highest score being 5 with opportunities to assess performance across five categories. How can individual performance be graphed so that it is easy to understand and easy to see? As the instructor, your intention is to present the graphs depicting group performance to the class. These graphs display the average performance of team members and aim to highlight ratings above 90%. In…

What are some lessons learned and gained from working with school behavior students? How to indicate what worked, what didn’t, and list organizational & societal challenges & opportunities. Include critical analysis of what changes or adjustments you would suggest or try in the field or program, to improve efficacy.

As we embark on this 10-week course on the psychology of creativity, I encourage each of you to evaluatethe various theories and ideas presented in the course from multiple perspectives. Specifically, reflect onhow the given theory/concept does or doesn’t capture your own experience, when engaged in creativeendeavours. Then, because no one theory is likely to have universal applicability, consider whether itseems to capture aspects of the creative process you’ve observed in others. Also think about whether itcaptures elements of your own evaluation of creative work (including the work of those around you aswell as the work of well-known artists).Although no one theory is likely to explain or describe everything about creativity, the so-called “Four Cs”discussed in this week’s readings give us one starting point, to classify subtypes of creativity. Kaufmanand Beghetto (2013) describe the following types of creativity:• Big-C: Genius-level works, generally regarded as masterpieces. Their…

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 5, Problem 1CTQ-204

Summary Introduction

Concept introduction

Skinner proposed that individual behavior, and society as a whole, could be designed and controled using the principles of operant conditioning (i.e., reinforcements and punishments).

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

There are both pros and cons to consider when imagining a Skinner society. To Skinner, the ability to control human behavior by controlling the environment would lead to a future filled with happy citizens and socially desirable outcomes. Such a society could be safer, cleaner, and more productive. Individuals in Skinner’s society could be more educated, charitable, kind, and motivated to achieve the same goals. The harmful notions of racism and sexism could be eliminated by punishing these ideas and reinforcing the ideals of human equality. Additionally, stigmatization of certain individuals, for example substance users, could be reduced or even eliminated if society viewed the environment as the problem, rather than assigning personal blame to these individuals. At the same time, however, it is also important to consider the potential costs of such a society. Individualism may become limited, if everyone is conditioned to believe in and work toward the same ideals. Additionally, who would decide on what gets reinforced or punished? Creating “universal” ideals could lead to totalitarian control, with society being controlled by a few people in power. Additionally, in a world defined by operant conditioning, people may develop a sort of apathy, or learned helplessness, if they believe that they have no power over their lives and that it is their environment that defines them. This lack of personal responsibility may be damaging to individuals’ sense of identity and their motivation. In this thought experiment, there are both positive and negative possibilities to consider at both the level of society and the individual.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 5, Problem 1CTQ-204

Summary Introduction

Concept introduction

Skinner proposed that individual behavior, and society as a whole, could be designed and controled using the principles of operant conditioning (i.e., reinforcements and punishments).

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

There are both pros and cons to consider when imagining a Skinner society. To Skinner, the ability to control human behavior by controlling the environment would lead to a future filled with happy citizens and socially desirable outcomes. Such a society could be safer, cleaner, and more productive. Individuals in Skinner’s society could be more educated, charitable, kind, and motivated to achieve the same goals. The harmful notions of racism and sexism could be eliminated by punishing these ideas and reinforcing the ideals of human equality. Additionally, stigmatization of certain individuals, for example substance users, could be reduced or even eliminated if society viewed the environment as the problem, rather than assigning personal blame to these individuals. At the same time, however, it is also important to consider the potential costs of such a society. Individualism may become limited, if everyone is conditioned to believe in and work toward the same ideals. Additionally, who would decide on what gets reinforced or punished? Creating “universal” ideals could lead to totalitarian control, with society being controlled by a few people in power. Additionally, in a world defined by operant conditioning, people may develop a sort of apathy, or learned helplessness, if they believe that they have no power over their lives and that it is their environment that defines them. This lack of personal responsibility may be damaging to individuals’ sense of identity and their motivation. In this thought experiment, there are both positive and negative possibilities to consider at both the level of society and the individual.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 5, Problem 1CTQ-204

Summary Introduction

Concept introduction

Skinner proposed that individual behavior, and society as a whole, could be designed and controled using the principles of operant conditioning (i.e., reinforcements and punishments).

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

There are both pros and cons to consider when imagining a Skinner society. To Skinner, the ability to control human behavior by controlling the environment would lead to a future filled with happy citizens and socially desirable outcomes. Such a society could be safer, cleaner, and more productive. Individuals in Skinner’s society could be more educated, charitable, kind, and motivated to achieve the same goals. The harmful notions of racism and sexism could be eliminated by punishing these ideas and reinforcing the ideals of human equality. Additionally, stigmatization of certain individuals, for example substance users, could be reduced or even eliminated if society viewed the environment as the problem, rather than assigning personal blame to these individuals. At the same time, however, it is also important to consider the potential costs of such a society. Individualism may become limited, if everyone is conditioned to believe in and work toward the same ideals. Additionally, who would decide on what gets reinforced or punished? Creating “universal” ideals could lead to totalitarian control, with society being controlled by a few people in power. Additionally, in a world defined by operant conditioning, people may develop a sort of apathy, or learned helplessness, if they believe that they have no power over their lives and that it is their environment that defines them. This lack of personal responsibility may be damaging to individuals’ sense of identity and their motivation. In this thought experiment, there are both positive and negative possibilities to consider at both the level of society and the individual.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 5, Problem 1CTQ-204

Summary Introduction

Concept introduction

Skinner proposed that individual behavior, and society as a whole, could be designed and controled using the principles of operant conditioning (i.e., reinforcements and punishments).

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

There are both pros and cons to consider when imagining a Skinner society. To Skinner, the ability to control human behavior by controlling the environment would lead to a future filled with happy citizens and socially desirable outcomes. Such a society could be safer, cleaner, and more productive. Individuals in Skinner’s society could be more educated, charitable, kind, and motivated to achieve the same goals. The harmful notions of racism and sexism could be eliminated by punishing these ideas and reinforcing the ideals of human equality. Additionally, stigmatization of certain individuals, for example substance users, could be reduced or even eliminated if society viewed the environment as the problem, rather than assigning personal blame to these individuals. At the same time, however, it is also important to consider the potential costs of such a society. Individualism may become limited, if everyone is conditioned to believe in and work toward the same ideals. Additionally, who would decide on what gets reinforced or punished? Creating “universal” ideals could lead to totalitarian control, with society being controlled by a few people in power. Additionally, in a world defined by operant conditioning, people may develop a sort of apathy, or learned helplessness, if they believe that they have no power over their lives and that it is their environment that defines them. This lack of personal responsibility may be damaging to individuals’ sense of identity and their motivation. In this thought experiment, there are both positive and negative possibilities to consider at both the level of society and the individual.

Answer 6

Chapter 5, Problem 1CTQ-204

Summary Introduction

Concept introduction

Skinner proposed that individual behavior, and society as a whole, could be designed and controled using the principles of operant conditioning (i.e., reinforcements and punishments).

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

There are both pros and cons to consider when imagining a Skinner society. To Skinner, the ability to control human behavior by controlling the environment would lead to a future filled with happy citizens and socially desirable outcomes. Such a society could be safer, cleaner, and more productive. Individuals in Skinner’s society could be more educated, charitable, kind, and motivated to achieve the same goals. The harmful notions of racism and sexism could be eliminated by punishing these ideas and reinforcing the ideals of human equality. Additionally, stigmatization of certain individuals, for example substance users, could be reduced or even eliminated if society viewed the environment as the problem, rather than assigning personal blame to these individuals. At the same time, however, it is also important to consider the potential costs of such a society. Individualism may become limited, if everyone is conditioned to believe in and work toward the same ideals. Additionally, who would decide on what gets reinforced or punished? Creating “universal” ideals could lead to totalitarian control, with society being controlled by a few people in power. Additionally, in a world defined by operant conditioning, people may develop a sort of apathy, or learned helplessness, if they believe that they have no power over their lives and that it is their environment that defines them. This lack of personal responsibility may be damaging to individuals’ sense of identity and their motivation. In this thought experiment, there are both positive and negative possibilities to consider at both the level of society and the individual.

Answer 7

Chapter 5, Problem 1CTQ-204

Summary Introduction

Concept introduction

Skinner proposed that individual behavior, and society as a whole, could be designed and controled using the principles of operant conditioning (i.e., reinforcements and punishments).

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

There are both pros and cons to consider when imagining a Skinner society. To Skinner, the ability to control human behavior by controlling the environment would lead to a future filled with happy citizens and socially desirable outcomes. Such a society could be safer, cleaner, and more productive. Individuals in Skinner’s society could be more educated, charitable, kind, and motivated to achieve the same goals. The harmful notions of racism and sexism could be eliminated by punishing these ideas and reinforcing the ideals of human equality. Additionally, stigmatization of certain individuals, for example substance users, could be reduced or even eliminated if society viewed the environment as the problem, rather than assigning personal blame to these individuals. At the same time, however, it is also important to consider the potential costs of such a society. Individualism may become limited, if everyone is conditioned to believe in and work toward the same ideals. Additionally, who would decide on what gets reinforced or punished? Creating “universal” ideals could lead to totalitarian control, with society being controlled by a few people in power. Additionally, in a world defined by operant conditioning, people may develop a sort of apathy, or learned helplessness, if they believe that they have no power over their lives and that it is their environment that defines them. This lack of personal responsibility may be damaging to individuals’ sense of identity and their motivation. In this thought experiment, there are both positive and negative possibilities to consider at both the level of society and the individual.