Estimates have been presented to Holly Farms, which is considering two environmental chambers for a project that will detail laboratory confirmations of on-line bacteria tests in chicken meat for the presence of E. coli 0157:H7 and Listeriamono-cytogenes. (a) If the project will last for 6 years and i = 10% per year, perform an AW evaluation to determine which chamber is more economical. (b) Chamber D103 can be purchased with different options and, therefore, at different installed costs. They range from $300,000 to $500,000. Will the selection change if one of these other models is installed? (c) Use single-cell spreadsheet functions to solve part (b).
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 5 Solutions
Basics Of Engineering Economy
Additional Business Textbook Solutions
Contemporary Engineering Economics (6th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Microeconomics (9th Edition) (Pearson Series in Economics)
Foundations of Economics (8th Edition)
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Macroeconomics (Book Only)
- QUESTION: To improve package tracking at a UPS transfer facility, conveyor equipment was upgraded with RFID sensors at a cost of $300 and has a useful life of 3 years. The operating cost is expected to be $150 per year. The salvage value of the equipment is expected to be $140 for the first 2 years, but due to obsolescence, it won't have a significant value after that. At an interest rate of 10% per year, (a) The economic service life of the equipment and associated annual worth (b) The percentage increase in the AW of cost if the equipment is retained 1 years longer than the ESL determinearrow_forwardThree years ago Chicago's O'Hare Airport purchased a new fire truck. Because of flight in- creases, new fire-fighting capacity is needed once again. An additional truck of the same capac- ity can be purchased now, or a double-capacity truck can replace the current fire truck. Esti- mates are presented below. Compare the options at 12% per year using (a) a 12-year study period and (b) a 9-year study period. Presently owned First cost P, S AOC, S Market value, S Salvage value, $ Life, years -151,000 (3 years ago) -1,500 70,000 10% of P 12 New Purchase -175,000 -1,500 12% of P 12 Double Capacity - 190,000 -2,500 10% of P 12arrow_forwardConcurris Prototyping is committed to using the newest and finest equipment in its labs. Accordingly, Wilma, a senior engineer, has recommended that a 2-year-old piece of precision measurement equipment be replaced immediately. She believes it can be demonstrated that the proposed equipment is economically advantageous at a 15% per year return and a planning horizon of 5 years Perform the replacement analysis using the annual worth method. a 5-year study period, and the estimates below. Was Wilma correct? Equipment Proposed 42,000 Original purchase price. S Current market value, S Remaining life, years stimated value in 5 years, S Salvage value after 15 years. S AOCES per year The AW of the defender a $- Wilma Click to select correct Current -30,000 15.000 5 2000 -13.000 15 30.000 5.000 -3,000 and the AW of the challenger is $-arrow_forward
- Dexcon Technologies, Inc., is evaluating two alternatives to produce its new plastic filament with tribological (i.e., low friction) properties for creating custom bearings for 3-D printers. The estimates associated with each alternative are shown below. Using a MARR of 17.00% per year, which alternative has the lower present worth? (Include a minus sign if necessary.) Method First Cost DDM $-220000 LS $-420000 M&O Cost, per Year Salvage Value $-50000 $6000 Life 2 years The present worth for the DDM method is $ The present worth for the LS method is $ The (Click to select) method is selected. (Click to select) DDM LS $-15000 $25000 4 yearsarrow_forwardDexcon Technologies, Inc., is evaluating two alternatives to produce its new plastic filament with tribological (i.e., low friction) properties for creating custom bearings for 3-D printers. The estimates associated with each alternative are shown below. Using a MARR of 15% per year, which alternative has the lower present worth? Method First Cost M&O Cost, per Year Salvage Value Life DDM $-240,000 $-30,000 $2,000 2 years LS $-480,000 $-15,000 $23,000 4 years The present worth for the DDM method is $ The present worth for the LS method is $ The (Click to select) v method is selected.arrow_forwardA company that manufactures clear PVC pipes is investigating the production options of batch and continuous processing. Estimated cash flows are: Batch Process First cost ($) Annual cost ($ per year) Salvage value, any year, Continuous -69,000 -48,000 -140,000 -31,000 20,000 25,000 Life (years) 3-10 The chief operating officer (COO) has asked you to determine if the batch option, using an interest rate of 15% per year, would ever have an annual worth lower than that of the continuous flow system. The continuous flow process was previously determined to have Its lowest cost over a 5-year life cycle, but the batch process can be used from 3 to 10 years. If selecting the batch process is sensitive to its useful life, what is the minimum life that makes It more attractive? The batch system will be less expensive than the continuous flow if it lasts over years.arrow_forward
- oncurris Prototyping is committed to using the newest and finest equipment in its labs. Accordingly, Wilma, a senior engineer, has recommended that a 2 -year-old piece of precision measurement equipment be replaced immediately. She believes it can be demonstrated that the proposed equipment is economically advantageous at a 15%-per year return and a planning horizon of 5 years. Perform the replacement analysis using the annual worth method, a 5 -year study period, and the estimates below. Was Wilma correct? \table[[Equipment,Current,Proposed],[Original purchase price, $,-30,000,-42,000arrow_forwardCompare three alternatives on the basis of their capitalized costs at i= 8.00% per year and select the best alternative. (Include a minus sign if necessary.) Alternative E First Cost $-75000 AOC, per Year $-70000 Salvage Value $16000 Life, Years 2 The capitalized cost of alternative E is $-214212.68 X 9 and alternative G is $ -971460.48 9 F $-420000 $-14000 $66000 4 The best alternative is G G $-920000 $-5000 $750000 ∞ alternative F is $-515145.86 Xarrow_forwardVirgin Galactic is considering two materials for certain parts in a re-useable space vehicle: carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) and fiber reinforced ceramic (FRC). The costs are shown below. Which should be selected on the basis of a present worth comparison at an interest rate of 10% per year? Solve using (a) tabulated factors, and (b) single-cell spreadsheet functions.arrow_forward
- A 50m2 apartment is for sale for $50,000 down payment plus $100,000 at the end of 1 year. The seller even offers the cash payment opportunity for which he asks for $124,000. If the market interest rate is 2.5% per month, what is the best alternative?arrow_forwardA company that manufactures magnetic flow meters expects to undertake a project that will have the cash flows estimated. First cost, $ −900,000 Equipment replacement cost in year 2, $ −300,000 Annual operating cost, $/year −950,000 Salvage value, $ 250,000 Life, years 4 At an interest rate of 10% per year, what is the equivalent annual cost of the project? Find the AW value using tabulated factors. The equivalent annual cost of the project is $− . Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forwardAn assembly operation at a software company now requires $100,000 per year in labor costs. A robot can be purchased and installed to automate this operation. The robot will cost $200,000. Maintenance and operation expenses of the robot are estimated to be $64,000 per year for the first 2 years and $10,000 thereafter. Replacement of minimal parts will cost $5000 every 3 years. Invested capital must earn at least 12% per year. What is the capitalized cost? (Draw cash flow diagram and show complete solution)arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education