If the protectionism of the agriculture industry in U S is justifiable under three arguments for trade protection explained in the book Concept Introduction: Arguments in Favor of Trade Protection: There are generally three arguments in favor of the trade protection are as follows: National Security: It is believed that during the time of international conflicts or bad relationship, the exporting country denies exporting the good. If the country is not self-sufficient then such situation leads to major crisis. Job Creation: It is believed that the import competing industries create additional jobs if they are protected against the import of the goods. Infant Industry Argument: It is the most widely discussed argument against the import of the good. It says that when an industry starts, it needs some time for the establishment so; it must be protected against the import to compete in the coming time.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 5, Problem 16P

To determine

If the protectionism of the agriculture industry in U S is justifiable under three arguments for trade protection explained in the book

Concept Introduction:

Arguments in Favor of Trade Protection: There are generally three arguments in favor of the trade protection are as follows:

National Security: It is believed that during the time of international conflicts or bad relationship, the exporting country denies exporting the good. If the country is not self-sufficient then such situation leads to major crisis.

Job Creation: It is believed that the import competing industries create additional jobs if they are protected against the import of the goods.

Infant Industry Argument: It is the most widely discussed argument against the import of the good. It says that when an industry starts, it needs some time for the establishment so; it must be protected against the import to compete in the coming time.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

please answer the following questions: What is money, and why does anyone want it? Explain the concept of the opportunity cost of holding money . Explain why an increase in U.S. interest rates relative to UK interest rates would affect the U.S.-UK exchange rate. Suppose that a person’s wealth is $50,000 and that her yearlyincome is $60,000. Also suppose that her money demand functionis given by Md = $Y10.35 - i2Derive the demand for bonds. Suppose the interest rate increases by 10 percentage points. What is the effect on her demand for bonds?b. What are the effects of an increase in income on her demand for money and her demand for bonds? Explain in words

Driving Quiz X My Course G city place w x D2L Login - Univ X D2L Login - Univ x D2L Login - U acmillanlearning.com/ihub/assessment/f188d950-dd73-11e0-9572-0800200c9a66/4db68a5e-69bb-4767-8d6c-a12d +1687 pts /1800 © Macmillan Learning Question 6 of 18 > The graph shows the average total cost (ATC) curve, the marginal cost (MC) curve, the average variable cost (AVC) curve, and the marginal revenue (MR) curve (which is also the market price) for a perfectly competitive firm that produces terrible towels. Answer the three questions, assuming that the firm is profit-maximizing and does not shut down in the short run. What is the firm's total revenue? S What is the firm's total cost? $ What is the firm's profit? (Enter a negative number for a loss.) $ Price $320 $300 $200 $150 205 260 336 365 Quantity MC ATC AVC MR=P

1. Suppose that the two nations face the following benefits of pollution, B, and costs of abatement, C: BN = 10, Bs = 7; CN = 5, Cs = 4. Further assume that if the nation chooses to abate pollution, it still receives the benefits of pollution but now must pay the cost of abatement as well. a. Identify the payoffs that accrue to each nation under the four different possible outcomes of the game and present these payoffs in the normal form of the game. b. Recall that the term dominant strategy defines the condition that a player in a game would prefer to play that strategy (in this case either pollute or abate) regardless of the strategy chosen by the other player in the game. Does either nation have a dominant strategy in this game? If so, what is it? c. Identify the Nash equilibria, or non-cooperative equilibria, of this game.