AUDITING+ASSURANCE 12MONTH ACCESS CARD
17th Edition
ISBN: 9780135635131
Author: ARENS
Publisher: WILEY
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 5, Problem 15.3MCQ
To determine
Identify the correct option to the statement given.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
The following pertains to auditor legal liability standards under the PSLRA:a. The Reform Act requires that, in any private securities fraud action in which the plaintiff is alleging a misleading statement or omission on the part of the defendant, “the complaint shall specify each statement alleged to have been misleading, the reason or reasons why the statement is misleading, and, if an allegation regarding the statement or omission is made on information and belief, the complaint shall state with particularity all facts on which that belief is formed.”90Do you believe this standard better protects auditors from legal liability than the standards which existed before the PSLRA? Explain.b. Do you believe the change in standards for auditors’ liability under the PSLRA from joint-and-several to proportional liability was a good thing? Explain.
Under common law, which of the following statements most accurately reflects the liability of a CPA who fraudulently gives an opinion on an audit of a client's financial statements?
A. The CPA is liable only to third parties in privity of contract with the CPA
B. The CPA is liable only to known users of the financial statements
C. The CPA probably is liable to any person who suffered a loss as a result of the fraud
D. The CPA probably is liable to the client even if the client was aware of the fraud and did not rely on the opinion
When investors sue auditors for damages under section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933,they must allege and provea. Scienter on the part of auditors.b. The audited financial statements contained a material misstatement.c. They relied on the materially misstated financial statements.d. Their reliance on the materially misstated financial statements was the direct cause oftheir loss.
Chapter 5 Solutions
AUDITING+ASSURANCE 12MONTH ACCESS CARD
Ch. 5 - Prob. 1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 4RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5RQCh. 5 - Prob. 6RQCh. 5 - Prob. 7RQCh. 5 - Prob. 8RQCh. 5 - Prob. 9RQCh. 5 - Prob. 10RQ
Ch. 5 - What potential sanctions does the SEC have against...Ch. 5 - Prob. 12RQCh. 5 - Prob. 13RQCh. 5 - Prob. 14.1MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 14.2MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 14.3MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 15.1MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 15.2MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 15.3MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 16.1MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 16.2MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 16.3MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 17DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 18DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 19DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 20DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 21DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 22DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 23DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 24DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 27DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 28C
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Select the necessary words from the list of possibilities to complete the following statements.arrow_forwardA CPA issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements of a company that sold common stock in a public offering subject to the Securities Act of 1933. Based on a misstatement in the financial statements, the CPA is being sued by an investor who purchased shares of this public offering. Which of the following represents a viable defense? A) The investor has not proven CPA negligence. B) The CPA detected the misstatement after the audit report date. C) The audit work was adequate to support the CPA's opinion. D) The investor did not rely upon the financial statement.arrow_forwardWhat does a third-party user of financial statements have to prove under common law in a suit against an auditor for the auditor's negligence? Explain each item with an examplearrow_forward
- What does a third-party user of financial statements have to prove under common law in a suit against an auditor for the auditor's negligence?arrow_forwardA group of investors sued Anderson, Olds, and Watershed, CPAs (AOW) for alleged damages suffered when the entity in which they held common stock went bankrupt. To avoidliability under the common law, AOW must demonstrate which of the following?a. The investors actually suffered a loss.b. The investors relied on the financial statements audited by AOW.c. The investors’ loss was a direct result of their reliance on the audited financial statements.d. The audit was conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards andwith due professional care.arrow_forwardWhich of the following would be the auditors’ most likely defense in an action broughtunder the Securities Exchange Act of 1934?a. The investor did not have privity with auditors.b. The investor did not suffer a loss based on the materially misstated financial statements.c. The auditors acted in good faith and were not aware of the materially misstated financialstatements.d. The financial statements were not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionarrow_forward
- While conducting an audit, Larson Associates, CPAs, failed to detect material misstatements included in its client's financial statements. Larson's unqualified opinion was included with the financial statements in a registration statement and prospectus for a public offering of securities made by the client. Larson knew that its opinion and the financial statements would be used for this purpose. Which of the following statements is correct with regard to a suit against Larson and the client by a purchaser of the securities under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933? Larson will not be liable if the purchaser did not rely on the financial statements. Larson will not be liable if it had reasonable grounds to believe the financial statements were accurate. The purchaser must prove that Larson knew of the material misstatements. The purchaser must prove that Larson failed to conduct the audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.arrow_forwardUnder the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (the Act), independent auditors are required to firsta. Report in writing all instances of noncompliance with the Act to the client’s board of directors.b. Report to the SEC all instances of noncompliance with the Act they believe have a material effect on financial statements if the board of directors does not first report to the SEC.c. Report clearly inconsequential noncompliance with the Act to the audit committee of the client’s board of directors.d. Resign from the audit engagement and report the instances of noncompliance with the Act to the SEC.arrow_forwardThe burden of proof that must be proven to recover losses from the auditors under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is generally considered to be: :arrow_forward
- M5 Under the foreseeability standard, an accountant is liable even if he or she had no knowledge of the intended user of the audited financial statements. t/farrow_forwardAuditors may be held liable to both their clients and third parties under common law. a. What must a client prove to recover its losses from the auditors under common law? b. In a court that adheres to the precedent set by the Ultramares v. Touche case, what must an ordinary third party prove to recover losses from the auditors under common lawarrow_forwardam. 27.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage Learning
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...AccountingISBN:9781305080577Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:South-Western College Pub
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305080577
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:South-Western College Pub