If the protectionism of the agriculture industry in U S is justifiable under three arguments for trade protection explained in the book Concept Introduction: Arguments in Favor of Trade Protection: There are generally three arguments in favor of the trade protection are as follows: National Security: It is believed that during the time of international conflicts or bad relationship, the exporting country denies exporting the good. If the country is not self-sufficient then such situation leads to major crisis. Job Creation: It is believed that the import competing industries create additional jobs if they are protected against the import of the goods. Infant Industry Argument: It is the most widely discussed argument against the import of the good. It says that when an industry starts, it needs some time for the establishment so; it must be protected against the import to compete in the coming time.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 5, Problem 12P

To determine

If the protectionism of the agriculture industry in U S is justifiable under three arguments for trade protection explained in the book

Concept Introduction:

Arguments in Favor of Trade Protection: There are generally three arguments in favor of the trade protection are as follows:

National Security: It is believed that during the time of international conflicts or bad relationship, the exporting country denies exporting the good. If the country is not self-sufficient then such situation leads to major crisis.

Job Creation: It is believed that the import competing industries create additional jobs if they are protected against the import of the goods.

Infant Industry Argument: It is the most widely discussed argument against the import of the good. It says that when an industry starts, it needs some time for the establishment so; it must be protected against the import to compete in the coming time.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

profit maximizing and loss minamization fire dragon co mindtap

Problem 3 You are given the following demand for European luxury automobiles: Q=1,000 P-0.5.2/1.6 where P-Price of European luxury cars PA = Price of American luxury cars P, Price of Japanese luxury cars I= Annual income of car buyers Assume that each of the coefficients is statistically significant (i.e., that they passed the t-test). On the basis of the information given, answer the following questions 1. Comment on the degree of substitutability between European and American luxury cars and between European and Japanese luxury cars. Explain some possible reasons for the results in the equation. 2. Comment on the coefficient for the income variable. Is this result what you would expect? Explain. 3. Comment on the coefficient of the European car price variable. Is that what you would expect? Explain.

Problem 2: A manufacturer of computer workstations gathered average monthly sales figures from its 56 branch offices and dealerships across the country and estimated the following demand for its product: Q=+15,000-2.80P+150A+0.3P+0.35Pm+0.2Pc (5,234) (1.29) (175) (0.12) (0.17) (0.13) R²=0.68 SER 786 F=21.25 The variables and their assumed values are P = Price of basic model = 7,000 Q==Quantity A = Advertising expenditures (in thousands) = 52 P = Average price of a personal computer = 4,000 P. Average price of a minicomputer = 15,000 Pe Average price of a leading competitor's workstation = 8,000 1. Compute the elasticities for each variable. On this basis, discuss the relative impact that each variable has on the demand. What implications do these results have for the firm's marketing and pricing policies? 2. Conduct a t-test for the statistical significance of each variable. In each case, state whether a one-tail or two-tail test is required. What difference, if any, does it make to…