Concept explainers
Incoine: Medicai Care Let x be per capita income in thousands of dollars. Let y be the number of medical doctors per 10,000 residents. Six small cities in Oregon gave the following information about x and y(based on information from Lifein America's Small Cities by G. S. Thomas, Prometheus Books).
x | 8.6 | 9.3 | 10.1 | 8.0 | 8.3 | 8.7 |
y | 9.6 | 18.5 | 20.9 | 10.2 | 11.4 | 13.1 |
Complete parts (a) through (e), given
(a)
To graph: The scatter diagram.
Explanation of Solution
Given: The data that consists of the variables ‘per capita income in thousands of dollars’ and ‘the number of medical doctors per 10,000 residents’, which are represented by x and y, respectively, are provided.
Graph:
Follow the steps given below in MS Excel to obtain the scatter diagram of the data.
Step 1: Enter the data into an MS Excel sheet. The screenshot is given below.
Step 2: Select the data and click on ‘Insert’. Go to ‘charts’ and select ‘Scatter’ as the chart type.
Step 3: Select the first plot and click the ‘add chart element’ option provided in the left-hand corner of the menu bar. Insert the ‘Axis titles’ and the ‘Chart title’. The scatter plot for the provided data is shown below.
Interpretation: The scatterplot shows that the correlation between the per capita income (x) and the number of medical doctors (y) is positive. So, as x increases (or decreases), the value of y increases (or decreases).
(b)
To test: Whether the provided values of
Answer to Problem 13P
Solution: The provided values, that is,
Explanation of Solution
Given: The provided values are
Calculation:
To compute
8.6 | 9.6 | 73.96 | 92.16 | 82.56 |
9.3 | 18.5 | 86.49 | 342.25 | 172.05 |
10.1 | 20.9 | 102.01 | 436.81 | 211.09 |
8 | 10.2 | 64 | 104.04 | 81.6 |
8.3 | 11.4 | 68.89 | 129.96 | 94.62 |
8.7 | 13.1 | 75.69 | 171.61 | 113.97 |
Now, the value of
Substitute the values in the above formula. Thus:
Thus, the value of
Conclusion: The provided values, that is,
(c)
To find: The values of
Answer to Problem 13P
Solution: The calculated values are
Explanation of Solution
Given: The provided values are
Calculation:
The value of
The value of
The value of
The value of
Therefore, the values are
The general formula of a least-squares line is:
Here, a is the y-intercept and b is the slope.
Substitute the values of a and b in the general equation to get the equation of the least-squares line of the data as follows:
Therefore, the least-squares line equation is
(d)
To graph: The least-squares line on the scatter diagram that passes through the point
Explanation of Solution
Given: The data that consists of the variables ‘per capita income’ and ‘the number of medical doctors per 10,000 residents’, which are represented by x and y, respectively, are provided.
Graph:
Follow the steps given below in MS Excel to obtain the scatter diagram of the data.
Step 1: Enter the data into an MS Excel sheet. The screenshot is given below.
Step 2: Select the data and click on ‘Insert’. Go to ‘charts’ and select ‘Scatter’ as the chart type.
Step 3: Select the first plot and click the ‘add chart element’ option provided in the left-hand corner of the menu bar. Insert the ‘Axis titles’ and the ‘Chart title’. The scatter plot for the provided data is shown below.
Step 4: Right click on any data point and select ‘Add Trendline’. In the dialogue box, select ‘linear’ and check ‘Display Equation on Chart’. The scatter diagram with the least-squares line is given below.
Interpretation: The least-squares line passes through the point
(e)
The value of
Answer to Problem 13P
Solution: The value of
Explanation of Solution
Given: The value of the correlation coefficient (r) is
Calculation: The coefficient of determination
Therefore, the value of
Further, the proportion of variation in y that cannot be explained can be calculated as:
Hence, the percentage of variation in y that cannot be explained is 12.8%.
Interpretation: About 87.2% of the variation in y can be explained by the corresponding variation in x and the least-squares line while the remaining 12.8% of variation cannot be explained.
(f)
To find: The predicted number of MDs (medical doctors) per 10,000 residents.
Answer to Problem 13P
Solution: The predicted value is 20.7 physicians per 10,000 residents.
Explanation of Solution
Given: The least-squares line from part (c) is
Calculation:
The predicted value
Thus, the value of
Interpretation: The predicted number of medical doctors per 10,000 residents for a city with a per capita income of 10 thousand dollars is 20.7.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 4 Solutions
Understanding Basic Statistics
- Let X be a random variable with support SX = {−3, 0.5, 3, −2.5, 3.5}. Part ofits probability mass function (PMF) is given bypX(−3) = 0.15, pX(−2.5) = 0.3, pX(3) = 0.2, pX(3.5) = 0.15.(a) Find pX(0.5).(b) Find the cumulative distribution function (CDF), FX(x), of X.1(c) Sketch the graph of FX(x).arrow_forwardA well-known company predominantly makes flat pack furniture for students. Variability with the automated machinery means the wood components are cut with a standard deviation in length of 0.45 mm. After they are cut the components are measured. If their length is more than 1.2 mm from the required length, the components are rejected. a) Calculate the percentage of components that get rejected. b) In a manufacturing run of 1000 units, how many are expected to be rejected? c) The company wishes to install more accurate equipment in order to reduce the rejection rate by one-half, using the same ±1.2mm rejection criterion. Calculate the maximum acceptable standard deviation of the new process.arrow_forward5. Let X and Y be independent random variables and let the superscripts denote symmetrization (recall Sect. 3.6). Show that (X + Y) X+ys.arrow_forward
- 8. Suppose that the moments of the random variable X are constant, that is, suppose that EX" =c for all n ≥ 1, for some constant c. Find the distribution of X.arrow_forward9. The concentration function of a random variable X is defined as Qx(h) = sup P(x ≤ X ≤x+h), h>0. Show that, if X and Y are independent random variables, then Qx+y (h) min{Qx(h). Qr (h)).arrow_forward10. Prove that, if (t)=1+0(12) as asf->> O is a characteristic function, then p = 1.arrow_forward
- 9. The concentration function of a random variable X is defined as Qx(h) sup P(x ≤x≤x+h), h>0. (b) Is it true that Qx(ah) =aQx (h)?arrow_forward3. Let X1, X2,..., X, be independent, Exp(1)-distributed random variables, and set V₁₁ = max Xk and W₁ = X₁+x+x+ Isk≤narrow_forward7. Consider the function (t)=(1+|t|)e, ER. (a) Prove that is a characteristic function. (b) Prove that the corresponding distribution is absolutely continuous. (c) Prove, departing from itself, that the distribution has finite mean and variance. (d) Prove, without computation, that the mean equals 0. (e) Compute the density.arrow_forward
- 1. Show, by using characteristic, or moment generating functions, that if fx(x) = ½ex, -∞0 < x < ∞, then XY₁ - Y2, where Y₁ and Y2 are independent, exponentially distributed random variables.arrow_forward1. Show, by using characteristic, or moment generating functions, that if 1 fx(x): x) = ½exarrow_forward1990) 02-02 50% mesob berceus +7 What's the probability of getting more than 1 head on 10 flips of a fair coin?arrow_forward
- Algebra: Structure And Method, Book 1AlgebraISBN:9780395977224Author:Richard G. Brown, Mary P. Dolciani, Robert H. Sorgenfrey, William L. ColePublisher:McDougal LittellGlencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw HillElementary Geometry For College Students, 7eGeometryISBN:9781337614085Author:Alexander, Daniel C.; Koeberlein, Geralyn M.Publisher:Cengage,
- College Algebra (MindTap Course List)AlgebraISBN:9781305652231Author:R. David Gustafson, Jeff HughesPublisher:Cengage LearningCollege AlgebraAlgebraISBN:9781305115545Author:James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem WatsonPublisher:Cengage LearningMathematics For Machine TechnologyAdvanced MathISBN:9781337798310Author:Peterson, John.Publisher:Cengage Learning,