Interpretation : Rutherford’s expected outcome of the gold-foil experiment with the actual outcome is to be compared and contrasted.
Concept Introduction : Rutherford performed a gold foil experiment to test the atomic structure plum-pudding model. The plum-pudding model of atomic structure was described by Thomson who discovered electrons.
Answer to Problem 13LC
When alpha particles passed through the gold foil, some particles were bounced off at large angles and lacks in deflection. This is due to the tiny core of an atom called the nucleus. Due to this reason, the actual outcome of Rutherford’s gold-foil experiment differed from his expected outcomes.
Explanation of Solution
To describe the structure of atoms, Rutherford performed a gold foil experiment.
He overcame the failures that occurred in a plum-pudding model of atomic structure.
A new atomic theory was proposed by Rutherford depending on his experimental results.
In accordance with Rutherford’s predictions, only a tiny deflection caused by the positive charge is believed to be dispersed throughout the gold atoms when the alpha particles go through the gold
According to experimental results, the majority of alpha particles either passed right through the gold foil or only minimally deflected it. The fact that a small percentage of the alpha particles bounced off the gold foil at extremely enormous angles, on the other hand, was unexpected. Some even returned directly in the direction of the source.
The positive charges and almost all of the mass are concentrated in a tiny area with enough positive charge to explain the significant alpha particle deflection.
He referred to it as the nucleus.
Chapter 4 Solutions
EP CHEMISTRY-1-YEAR LICENSE (REALIZE)
- An essential part of the experimental design process is to select appropriate dependent and independent variables. True Falsearrow_forward10.00 g of Compound X with molecular formula C₂Hg are burned in a constant-pressure calorimeter containing 40.00 kg of water at 25 °C. The temperature of the water is observed to rise by 2.604 °C. (You may assume all the heat released by the reaction is absorbed by the water, and none by the calorimeter itself.) Calculate the standard heat of formation of Compound X at 25 °C. Be sure your answer has a unit symbol, if necessary, and round it to the correct number of significant digits.arrow_forwardneed help not sure what am doing wrong step by step please answer is 971A During the lecture, we calculated the Debye length at physiological salt concentrations and temperature, i.e. at an ionic strength of 150 mM (i.e. 0.150 mol/l) and a temperature of T=310 K. We predicted that electrostatic interactions are effectively screened beyond distances of 8.1 Å in solutions with a physiological salt concentration. What is the Debye length in a sample of distilled water with an ionic strength of 10.0 µM (i.e. 1.00 * 10-5 mol/l)? Assume room temperature, i.e. T= 298 K, and provide your answer as a numerical expression with 3 significant figures in Å (1 Å = 10-10 m).arrow_forward
- Influence of salt concentrations on electrostatic interactions 2 Answer is 2.17A why not sure step by step please What is the Debye length in a concentrated salt solution with an ionic strength of 2.00 mol/l? Assume room temperature, i.e. T= 298 K, and provide your answer as a numerical expression with 3 significant figures in Å (1 Å = 10-10 m).arrow_forwardThe name of the following molecule is: Νarrow_forwardThe table shows the tensile stress-strain values obtained for various hypothetical metals. Based on this, indicate which is the most brittle and which is the most tough (or most resistant). Breaking strength Elastic modulus Material Yield strength Tensile strength Breaking strain A (MPa) 415 (MPa) (MPa) (GPa) 550 0.15 500 310 B 700 850 0.15 720 300 C Non-effluence fracture 650 350arrow_forward
- Please correct answer and don't used hand raitingarrow_forwardThe table shows the tensile stress-strain values obtained for various hypothetical metals. Based on this, indicate which material will be the most ductile and which the most brittle. Material Yield strength Tensile strength Breaking strain Breaking strength Elastic modulus (MPa) (MPa) (MPa) (GPa) A 310 340 0.23 265 210 B 100 120 0.40 105 150 с 415 550 0.15 500 310 D 700 850 0.14 720 210 E - Non-effluence fracture 650 350arrow_forwardPlease correct answer and don't used hand raitingarrow_forward
- ChemistryChemistryISBN:9781305957404Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCostePublisher:Cengage LearningChemistryChemistryISBN:9781259911156Author:Raymond Chang Dr., Jason Overby ProfessorPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationPrinciples of Instrumental AnalysisChemistryISBN:9781305577213Author:Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. CrouchPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Organic ChemistryChemistryISBN:9780078021558Author:Janice Gorzynski Smith Dr.Publisher:McGraw-Hill EducationChemistry: Principles and ReactionsChemistryISBN:9781305079373Author:William L. Masterton, Cecile N. HurleyPublisher:Cengage LearningElementary Principles of Chemical Processes, Bind...ChemistryISBN:9781118431221Author:Richard M. Felder, Ronald W. Rousseau, Lisa G. BullardPublisher:WILEY