The comparative advantage of countries.
Answer to Problem 2P
a. New Zealand- The cost of producing 1 Apple is 0.25 plums and the cost of producing 1 plum is 4 Apples.
Spain- The cost of producing 1 Apple is 1 plum and the cost of producing 1 plum is 1 Apple.
b. New Zealand should produce apples and Spain should produce plums.
c. Graph
d. The total gain of Apples is 20 and the total gain of plums is 10.
Explanation of Solution
The comparative advantage is the advantage that the country has over the competitor in the
Option (a):
In New Zealand, the production of 20 apples needs the resources which can alternatively be used for the production of 5 plums. Thus, the opportunity cost of producing 1 apple can be calculated by dividing the total units of plums given up by the total units of apples gained as follows:
Thus, the opportunity cost of producing 1 apple in New Zealand is 0.25 plum.
The opportunity cost of producing plum in New Zealand can be calculated by dividing the number of units of apples given up with the number of units of plums gained as follows:
So, the opportunity cost of producing 1 plum in New Zealand is 4 apples.
In Spain, the production of 20 apples needs the resources which can alternatively be used for the production of 20 plums. Thus, the opportunity cost of producing 1 apple can be calculated by dividing the total units of plums given up by the total units of apples gained as follows:
Thus, the opportunity cost of producing 1 apple in Spain is 1 plum.
The opportunity cost of producing plum in Spain can be calculated by dividing the number of units of apples given up with the number of units of plums gained as follows:
So, the opportunity cost of producing 1 plum in Spain is 1 apple.
Option (b):
The opportunity cost of producing a unit of apple is lower in New Zealand (0.25 Plum) compared to Spain (1 Plum). Thus, New Zealand should specialize in the production of apples.
The opportunity cost of producing a unit of plum is lower in Spain (1 Apple) compared to that in New Zealand (4 Apples). Thus, Spain should specialize in the production of plums.
Option (c):
Before the trade, the
According to the terms of trade of
Similarly, Spain can have 2 apples for 1 plum in the international trade which will increase their total possible consumption of apples from 60 million bushels to 120 million bushels. Thus, the vertical intercept of the Spain's production possibility curve will increase to 120 million bushels. So, the slope of the production possibility curve of Spain will decrease from -1 to -0.5.
The changes are shown in the diagram as follows:
Option (d):
The mixed product of New Zealand is B and of Spain is S. According to the table, the total output of apples in New Zealand at this mixed product is 20 million bushels and the output of plums is 10 million bushels. Similarly, at the given output combination S of Spain, the total output of apples is 20 million bushes and of plums is 40 million bushels.
Thus, the total output of the apple and plum before the trade can be calculated by adding the individual quantities of apples that are produced in New Zealand and Spain together are as follows:
Thus, the total output of apples before the trade was 40 million bushels.
Similarly, the total output of plums can be calculated by adding together each country’s outputs are as follows:
Thus, the total output of plums before the trade was 50 million bushels.
After the specialization by New Zealand in the production of apples, the total output of apples increased to 60 million bushels. Similarly, the specialization by Spain in the production of plums increased the total output of plums to 60 million bushels. Thus, total
Thus, the total output gain of apples is 20 million bushels.
Similarly, the total output gain in the case of plums can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the total output gain in plums is 10 million bushels.
Concept introduction:
Comparative advantage: It is the ability of the producer, firm or a country to produce a good or service at the lowest opportunity cost of production than the competitors.
Specialization: It is the process of identifying the product in which, the country has the comparative advantage in the form of lower opportunity cost of production. Thus, they can focus on the production of that commodity which will increase the output and they can engage in an international exchange in order to obtain the products in which they don’t have any comparative advantage.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 40 Solutions
Economics (Irwin Economics)
- Poland requires 4 hours of labor to produce 1 ton of coal and 1 hour of labor to produce a bushel of wheat. The Czech Republic requires 6 hours of labor to produce 1 ton of coal and 1 hour of labor to produce a bushel of wheat. Suppose that Poland has 1,000 hours of labor and that it completely specializes according to its comparative advantage. How many units of which product will it produce? 250 tons of coal 1,000 bushels of wheat O100 bushels of wheat 4,000 tons of coal One of the main reasons for China to actively invest in foreign companies is to enhance the competitiveness of Chinese firms globally. take advantage of low wages in foreign countries. Omake best use of its technological expertise in the world market. meet the growing demand of the high population in China.arrow_forwardAnswer the question on the basis of the following production possibilities tables for two countries, Latalia and Trombonia Latalia's Production Possibilities с 2 10 Pork (Tons) Beans (Tons) Pork (Tons) Beans (Tons) A 4 0 3 5 8 0 1 15 Trombonia's Production Possibilities с 4 12 D 0 20 2 18 E O 24 Refer to the tables. If these two nations specialize on the basis of comparative advantage: Trombonia will produce beans and Latalia will produce pork. Trombonia will produce both beans and pork Latalia will produce both beans and pork and Trombonia will produce neither. Latalia will produce beans and Trombonia will produce pork.arrow_forward3. The following hypothetical production possibilities tables are for China and the United States. Assume that before specialization and trade, the optimal product mix for China is alternative B and for the United States is alternative U. LO20.2 a. Are comparative-cost conditions such that the two countries should specialize? If so, what product should each produce? b. What is the total gain in apparel and chemical output that would result from such specialization? c. What are the limits of the terms of trade? Suppose that the actual terms of trade are 1 unit of apparel for 1 unit of chemicals and 4 units of apparel for 6 units of chemicals. What are the gains from specialization and trade for each nation? China Production Possibilities Product A D F Apparel (in thousands) 30 24 18 12 Chemicals (in tons) 12 18 24 30 U.S. Production Possibilities Product R T. V Apparel (in thousands) hemicals (in tons) 10 8. 4 4 8. 12 16 20 p. 579arrow_forward
- Suppose that two countries can produce wheat or cotton. If country A produces only wheat it can produce 38 units of wheat, and if it only produces cotton it can produce 45 units of cotton. If country B produces only wheat it can produce 27 units of wheat, and if it only produces cotton it can produce 35 units of cotton. Given the production possibilities frontiers above which of the following would be feasible terms of trade between country A and country B? O a. One unit of cotton for 0.92 units of wheat. O b. One unit of cotton for 0.72 units of wheat. O c. One unit of wheat for 1.08 units of cotton. O d. One unit of wheat for 1.35 units of cotton. O e. None of the other answers are feasible terms of trade.arrow_forwardAssume that England and Spain can switch between producing cheese and producing bread at a constant rate. Labor Hours Needed Number of Units to Make 1 Unit of Produced in 40 Hours Cheese Bread Cheese Bread England 1 40 10 Spain 10 England has a comparative advantage in the production of O a. cheese and Spain has a comparative advantage in the production of bread. Ob. neither good and Spain has a comparative advantage in the production of both goods. Oc. both goods and Spain has a comparative advantage in the production of neither good. O d. bread and Spain has a comparative advantage in the production of cheese.arrow_forward25 20 15 10 LO 0 P a 0 O 3 (d) areas (b) + (c) + (d) + (e) (e) areas (a) + (b) + (c) + (d) e 6 b O S 9 12 15 18 25. If the free trade price is IP and this country imposes a trade tariff of $6, the loss to the economy as a result of this tariff is represented by O(a) area (a) in this graph (b) area (b) in this graph (c) areas (c) + (d) P* 21 IP D 24 Qarrow_forward
- For each hour worked, a U.S. worker can produce 4 dozen baguettes, or 2 tonnes of aluminum. Canadian workers can produce 2 dozen baguettes, or 1 tonne of aluminum per hour. The information indicates that O A. Canada has comparative advantage in aluminum, and the U.S. has comparative advantage in baguettes. OB. neither country has comparative advantage in aluminum or baguettes. O C. Canada has comparative advantage in baguettes, and the U.S. has comparative advantage in aluminum. O D. the U.S. has comparative advantage in both alyminum and baguettes.arrow_forwardurgently needarrow_forwardThe fictional country of Anastialia is a small country with rich resources in minerals. In a day it can produce 100 pounds of silver or 50 pounds of copper. Another country, West Burma, can produce 25 pounds of silver or 5 pounds of copper in a day. From this data, which country has the comparative advantage in copper production by producing it at a lower opportunity cost? O Neither country has a comparative advantage. O Anastialia O West Burmaarrow_forward
- Canada exports canola oil to Japan. Therefore, Japan must have the comparative advantage in the production of canola oil, and its autarkic price is higher than the free trade price. O Japan must have the comparative advantage in the production of canola oil, and its autarkic price is lower than the free trade price. Canada must have the comparative advantage in the production of canola oil, and its autarkic price is higher than the free trade price. Canada must have the comparative advantage in the production of canola oil, and its autarkic price is lower than the free trade price.arrow_forwardPrice (dollars per shirt) 44 40 36 32 28 24 20 16 12 O 8 O 32 million The figure shows the market for shirts in the United States, where D is the domestic demand curve and S is the domestic supply curve. The world price is $20 per shirt. The United States imposes a tariff on imported shirts, $4 per shirt. 24 million S In the figure above, with the tariff the United States imports 8 million D O 16 million 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 Quantity (millions of shirts per year) million shirts per year.arrow_forwardIn a two-country, two-product world, the statement 'Germany enjoys a comparative advantage over France in cars relative to ships' is equivalent to O a. a. Germany having a comparative advantage over France in cars and ships. O b. France having a comparative disadvantage compared to Germany in cars and ships. O c. France having no comparative advantage over Germany. O d. France should produce cars. O e. France having a comparative advantage over Germany in ships. Larrow_forward
- Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningBrief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...EconomicsISBN:9781337091985Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningExploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc