The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases
9th Edition
ISBN: 9781305764460
Author: Frank B Cross/ Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: CENGAGE C
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 4, Problem 3BCP
Summary Introduction
Case summary: TRCoE and TOU declared that the thesis submission of mechanical engineering graduate students had extensive and deliberate plagiarism through a press conference. The faculty, including the person JG who was the chair of the department, was singled out for “ignoring the ethical responsibility.” JG was not allowed to advise the student. JG filed a case because the due process was not followed.
To find: The requirement of due process under the following situation.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Yuri created a very unique service offered by her company. Her company
dubs lesson and speeches to any language for political persons and
resource speaker. In order to protect her company from unfair
competition what type of intellectual property should Yuri apply for?
Yuri should apply for copyright P so that no one can published their service without
their permission
Yuri should apply for industrial design to protect the ornamental shape of their
product
Yuri should apply for geographical origin since product came from their home town
Yuri should apply for service mark in order to protect her company from unfair
competition
World Color operated a printing plant. a written policy stated: “Baseball caps are prohibited except for [world Color] baseball caps.” The policy permitted employees to accessorize their uniforms “in good taste and in accordance with all safety rules.” The Graphic Communications Conference of the international Brotherhood of Teamsters filed an unfair labor practice charge with the NLRB claiming that the policy prohibited employees from wearing union insignia at work. it said world Color was interfering with its employees’ “right to self-organization, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, . . . and to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining” as guaranteed by federal law. The NLRB agreed and world Color appealed. Was the baseball cap policy an unfair labor practice?
East Coast Waffles, Inc., an Atlanta-based company which owns and operates more than 100 Waffle House restaurants in Florida and Virginia, fired an employee who claimed that his fellow servers at a Tampa Florida Waffle House were harassing several customers because of their race. The employee that was fired did not claim "whistleblower" status, the employee simply claimed that such action was improper.Is this permitted (firing the employee who reported the actions of the others) under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act?Post at least a 125 word discussion and respond to at least 2 of your colleagues' postings. Support your discussion with at least 1 Internet citation in APA style.
Chapter 4 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- The accidental baker Mamello Morongwe, a certified food technologist was working on a biscuit recipe for her employer, a leading biscuit manufacturer, when she discovered a muffin recipe. The employer expressed no interest in pursuing this segment of the market and gave Mamello the clearance to use the recipe in her private capacity for personal benefit, as part of their employee development program. After utilising this recipe to bake muffins for special events only, which she distributed over weekends, Mamello finally resigned from her job and is now pursuing her business on a full-time basis – her former employer is now a customer and has placed a full-year weekly order for 20 dozens of muffins every Friday. Armed with a business plan and registration documents for her business, Muffin Boffin, Mamello feels ready to take the country by storm. Q.1 . Explain below categories of inventory that are likely to be found at Muffin Boffin. Use practical examples relevant to their…arrow_forwardThe accidental baker Mamello Morongwe, a certified food technologist was working on a biscuit recipe for her employer, a leading biscuit manufacturer, when she discovered a muffin recipe. The employer expressed no interest in pursuing this segment of the market and gave Mamello the clearance to use the recipe in her private capacity for personal benefit, as part of their employee development program. After utilising this recipe to bake muffins for special events only, which she distributed over weekends, Mamello finally resigned from her job and is now pursuing her business on a full-time basis – her former employer is now a customer and has placed a full-year weekly order for 20 dozens of muffins every Friday. Armed with a business plan and registration documents for her business, Muffin Boffin, Mamello feels ready to take the country by storm. ''Despite materials handling being a fairly high-cost element, which does not contribute to the value of the product, this activity cannot…arrow_forwardThe accidental baker Mamello Morongwe, a certified food technologist was working on a biscuit recipe for her employer, a leading biscuit manufacturer, when she discovered a muffin recipe. The employer expressed no interest in pursuing this segment of the market and gave Mamello the clearance to use the recipe in her private capacity for personal benefit, as part of their employee development program. After utilising this recipe to bake muffins for special events only, which she distributed over weekends, Mamello finally resigned from her job and is now pursuing her business on a full-time basis – her former employer is now a customer and has placed a full-year weekly order for 20 dozens of muffins every Friday. Armed with a business plan and registration documents for her business, Muffin Boffin, Mamello feels ready to take the country by storm. “Effective negotiators recognise that very few negotiations are conducted in a purely win-win or win-lose context. Moving towards win-win…arrow_forward
- 4-1 REASONABLE RESTRICTIONS ON FREE SPEECH. Michael Mayfield, the president of Mendo Mill and Lumber Company in California, received a “notice of a legal claim” from Edward Starski. This “claim” alleged that a stack of lumber fell on a customer as a result of a Mendo employee’s “incompetence.” The “notice” presented a settlement offer on the customer’s behalf in exchange for a release of liability for Mendo. In a follow-up phone conversation with Mayfield, Starski said that he was an attorney—which, in fact, he was not. Starski was arrested and charged with violating a state statute that prohibited the unlawful practice of law. He argued that “creating an illusion” that he was an attorney fell within the protection of his First Amendment right to free speech. Is Starski correct? Explain your answer. [The People v. Edward Robert Starski, 7 Cal.App.5th 215, 212 Cal.Rptr.3d 622 (1 Dist. 2017)] (See Business and the Bill of Rights.)arrow_forward"7. Freedom of Speech. Wandering Dago, Inc. (WD), operates a food truck in Albany, New York. WD brands itself and the food it sells with language generally viewed as ethnic slurs. Owners Andrea Loguidice and Brandon Snooks, however, view the branding as giving a “nod to their Italian heritage” and “weakening the derogatory force of the slur.” Twice, WD applied to participate as a vendor in a summer lunch program in a state-owned plaza. Both times, the New York State Office of General Services (OGS) denied the appli-cation because of WD’s branding. WD filed a suit in a federal district court against RoAnn Destito, the commissioner of OGS, contending that the agency had violated WD’s right to free speech. What principles apply to the government’s regula-tion of the content of speech? How do those principles apply in WD’s case? Explain. [Wandering Dago, Inc. v. Destito, 879 F.3d 20 (2d Cir. 2018)] (See Business and the Bill of Rights.)"arrow_forward1. The prohibits unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors and other unsolicited conduct of a sexual nature for both men and women. Gender Discrimination Act of 1994 Equal Pay Act Civil Rights Act of 1991 Sexual Harassment Prohibition Actarrow_forward
- The bars unfair treatment against women in employment based on childbirth or related conditions. a. Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973 b. Protection of Life during Pregnancy Act 2013 C. Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 d. Title VII of 1964 Civil Rights Actarrow_forward31.Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination Multiple Choice in employment decisions on the basis of race, religion, sex, color, or national origin. against workers over the age of 40 and restricts mandatory retirement. against women in employment decisions on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical decisions. in the areas of hiring and firing only. against disabled individuals in employment decisions and requires that employers make accommodations for disabled workers to enable them to perform their jobs.arrow_forwardProvide and explain at least two examples of organizations (with citations) that have been financially impacted by instances of either defamatory speech, negative reviews, or hate speech.arrow_forward
- Company XYZ purchased an Employment-Related Practices Liability policy. A supervisor in the marketing department is being sued for discriminatory practices prohibited by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Is there coverage under the policy for this claim? Explain your answer by referencing the exact Section/Letter/Number in the EXECUTIVE LIABILITY policyarrow_forwardThe National Safety Council estimates that one quarter of all automobile and truck accidents involve cell phone use or texting. In fatality and injury vehicle accidents, plaintiffs’ attorneys subpoena cell phone records, which often form the basis of compelling liability cases against driver-employees and their employers via vicarious liability. While balancing the privacy rights of the employee, with the business practice of the employer, is it appropriate to ban all cell phone usage while driving on company business. Please fully discuss. HINT: Address the Vicarious Liability & Privacy Rights Issues. Please use the IRAC format Issue: Call of the QuestionRule: Rule of Law to be applied to properly answer the questionAnalysis: Applying the rule of law to the facts of the problem presentedConclusion: Answer to the Issuearrow_forwardShould the public have taken more of a stance against his actions? If so, what action(s) could the public have taken? If not, give reasons why the public should not involve itself in such situations. Should the government have taken any action in this situation, given that the CEO was making a point against legislation it had introduced? If so, explain the action that you believe the government should have taken. If not, explain why you do not believe any government action is justified.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education