A law was enacted by the state legislature that required the motorcycle operators or passengers to wear a protective helmet. A licensed motorcycle operator, JA, filed a case to declare the act as unconstitutional. JA emphasized that the act violated the equal protection act as it discriminates between motorcyclist and motorist. To find: The reason for not raising the substantive due process clause and for raising the equal protection clause.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: A law was enacted by the state legislature that required the motorcycle operators or passengers to wear a protective helmet. A licensed motorcycle operator, JA, filed a case to declare the act as unconstitutional. JA emphasized that the act violated the equal protection act as it discriminates between motorcyclist and motorist.

To find: The reason for not raising the substantive due process clause and for raising the equal protection clause.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The substantive due process clause is focused on the content of legislation and not on the fairness of the procedure. Therefore, it was not applied to the given case.

The issue of equal protection clause is raised as there is a possible discrimination between motorcycle operators and motorists. It is because the law was applied to only a particular set of members. Therefore, the issue of equal protection was raised because both, the motorcyclists and motorists are considered to be on an equal platform.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

I'm a senior majoring in Business Management at University. Weakness: Responsible for my High School’s Yearbook - Situation: - Task: - Action: - Result:

please listen if you deslike my answer i will give in your answer. Bartleby also changed the rule for this change we all are responsible so please don't do this. Also if we will give more deslike bartleby site will be shut down.

I'm a senior majoring in Business Management at University. Accomplishment: Received Perfect Attendance Award at High School - Situation: - Task: - Action: - Result:

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: A law was enacted by the state legislature that required the motorcycle operators or passengers to wear a protective helmet. A licensed motorcycle operator, JA, filed a case to declare the act as unconstitutional. JA emphasized that the act violated the equal protection act as it discriminates between motorcyclist and motorist.

To find: The reason for not raising the substantive due process clause and for raising the equal protection clause.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The substantive due process clause is focused on the content of legislation and not on the fairness of the procedure. Therefore, it was not applied to the given case.

The issue of equal protection clause is raised as there is a possible discrimination between motorcycle operators and motorists. It is because the law was applied to only a particular set of members. Therefore, the issue of equal protection was raised because both, the motorcyclists and motorists are considered to be on an equal platform.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: A law was enacted by the state legislature that required the motorcycle operators or passengers to wear a protective helmet. A licensed motorcycle operator, JA, filed a case to declare the act as unconstitutional. JA emphasized that the act violated the equal protection act as it discriminates between motorcyclist and motorist.

To find: The reason for not raising the substantive due process clause and for raising the equal protection clause.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The substantive due process clause is focused on the content of legislation and not on the fairness of the procedure. Therefore, it was not applied to the given case.

The issue of equal protection clause is raised as there is a possible discrimination between motorcycle operators and motorists. It is because the law was applied to only a particular set of members. Therefore, the issue of equal protection was raised because both, the motorcyclists and motorists are considered to be on an equal platform.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: A law was enacted by the state legislature that required the motorcycle operators or passengers to wear a protective helmet. A licensed motorcycle operator, JA, filed a case to declare the act as unconstitutional. JA emphasized that the act violated the equal protection act as it discriminates between motorcyclist and motorist.

To find: The reason for not raising the substantive due process clause and for raising the equal protection clause.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The substantive due process clause is focused on the content of legislation and not on the fairness of the procedure. Therefore, it was not applied to the given case.

The issue of equal protection clause is raised as there is a possible discrimination between motorcycle operators and motorists. It is because the law was applied to only a particular set of members. Therefore, the issue of equal protection was raised because both, the motorcyclists and motorists are considered to be on an equal platform.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 4, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: A law was enacted by the state legislature that required the motorcycle operators or passengers to wear a protective helmet. A licensed motorcycle operator, JA, filed a case to declare the act as unconstitutional. JA emphasized that the act violated the equal protection act as it discriminates between motorcyclist and motorist.

To find: The reason for not raising the substantive due process clause and for raising the equal protection clause.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The substantive due process clause is focused on the content of legislation and not on the fairness of the procedure. Therefore, it was not applied to the given case.

The issue of equal protection clause is raised as there is a possible discrimination between motorcycle operators and motorists. It is because the law was applied to only a particular set of members. Therefore, the issue of equal protection was raised because both, the motorcyclists and motorists are considered to be on an equal platform.

Answer 6

Chapter 4, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: A law was enacted by the state legislature that required the motorcycle operators or passengers to wear a protective helmet. A licensed motorcycle operator, JA, filed a case to declare the act as unconstitutional. JA emphasized that the act violated the equal protection act as it discriminates between motorcyclist and motorist.

To find: The reason for not raising the substantive due process clause and for raising the equal protection clause.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The substantive due process clause is focused on the content of legislation and not on the fairness of the procedure. Therefore, it was not applied to the given case.

The issue of equal protection clause is raised as there is a possible discrimination between motorcycle operators and motorists. It is because the law was applied to only a particular set of members. Therefore, the issue of equal protection was raised because both, the motorcyclists and motorists are considered to be on an equal platform.

Answer 7

Chapter 4, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: A law was enacted by the state legislature that required the motorcycle operators or passengers to wear a protective helmet. A licensed motorcycle operator, JA, filed a case to declare the act as unconstitutional. JA emphasized that the act violated the equal protection act as it discriminates between motorcyclist and motorist.

To find: The reason for not raising the substantive due process clause and for raising the equal protection clause.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The substantive due process clause is focused on the content of legislation and not on the fairness of the procedure. Therefore, it was not applied to the given case.

The issue of equal protection clause is raised as there is a possible discrimination between motorcycle operators and motorists. It is because the law was applied to only a particular set of members. Therefore, the issue of equal protection was raised because both, the motorcyclists and motorists are considered to be on an equal platform.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Ch. 4 - Prob. 1RE Ch. 4 - Prob. 2RE Ch. 4 - Prob. 3RE Ch. 4 - Prob. 4RE Ch. 4 - Prob. 1IS Ch. 4 - Prob. 2IS Ch. 4 - Prob. 1BS Ch. 4 - Prob. 2BS Ch. 4 - Prob. 3BCP Ch. 4 - Prob. 4BCP

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 4 Solutions