ESSENTIALS OF ECONOMICS<LCPO>
ESSENTIALS OF ECONOMICS<LCPO>
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781265544669
Author: SCHILLER
Publisher: MCG
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 4, Problem 1QFD
To determine

To explain the reason behind people stuffing themselves in all-you-can-eat buffet with the help of utility and demand theories.

Expert Solution & Answer
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Consumer preferences are affected by their experiences, religion, and upbringing.

The theory of consumer behavior examines consumer preferences and the way it influence their economic behavior.

Utility is defined as the ability of a good to satisfy a want or the satisfaction that the consumer receives from the goods they consume.

In utility analysis, there are 2 analysis introduced by two different economists. Both theories assume that preferences are rational and every consumer tries to maximize their satisfaction from consuming goods and services.

The first analysis is Cardinal Utility (Marginal Utility Analysis). This means that a person can add certain values or numbers of utils from consumption of each unit of a good.

Here, utility is measurable in a cardinal sense.

The second one is the Ordinal Utility (Indifference Curve Analysis). This only ranks the utility received from consumption of various amounts of a good or baskets of goods.

The utility is measurable in an ordinal sense.

Ordinal Utility process is used to ranks various consumable bundles, whereas Cardinal Utility provides an actual index or measure of satisfaction.

People stuff themselves at all-you-can-eat buffets because the marginal cost of an additional bite is zero at any level.

From the perspective of utility, the additional utility derived from an additional bite should be zero. Until it becomes zero, people keep consuming the good.

From the perspective of demand, they consume food at buffets till the point where the demand curve intersects the X-axis where quantity is measured. This means that the price is zero and the quantity demanded is maximized.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
1. Suppose that the two nations face the following benefits of pollution, B, and costs of abatement, C: BN = 10, Bs = 7; CN = 5, Cs = 4. Further assume that if the nation chooses to abate pollution, it still receives the benefits of pollution but now must pay the cost of abatement as well. a. Identify the payoffs that accrue to each nation under the four different possible outcomes of the game and present these payoffs in the normal form of the game. b. Recall that the term dominant strategy defines the condition that a player in a game would prefer to play that strategy (in this case either pollute or abate) regardless of the strategy chosen by the other player in the game. Does either nation have a dominant strategy in this game? If so, what is it? c. Identify the Nash equilibria, or non-cooperative equilibria, of this game.
agrody calming Inted 001 and me 2. A homeowner is concerned about the various air pollutants (e.g., benzene and methane) released in her house when she cooks with natural gas. She is considering replacing her gas oven and stove with an electric stove comprising an induction cooktop and convection oven. The new appliance costs $900 to purchase and install. Capping the old gas line costs an additional $150 (a one-time fee). The old line must be inspected for leaks each year after capping, at a cost of $35 for each inspection. a. If the homeowner plans to remain in the house for four more years and the discount rate is 4%, what is the minimum present value of the benefits that the homeowner would need to experience for this purchase to be justified based on its private net sub present value? b. While trying to understand how she might express the value of reduced exposure to indoor air pollutants in dollar terms, the homeowner consulted the EPA website and found estimates provided by…
After the ban is imposed, Joe’s firm switches to the more expensive biodegradable disposable cups. This increases the cost associated with each cup of coffee it produces. Which cost curve(s) will be impacted by the use of the more expensive biodegradable disposable cups? Why? Which cost curve(s) will not shift, and why not? Please use the table below to answer this question. For the second column (“Impacted? If so, how?”), please use one of the following three choices: No shift; Shifts up (i.e., increases: at nearly any given quantity, the cost goes up); or Shifts down (i.e., decreases: at nearly any given quantity, the cost goes down). $ Cost Curve Impacted? If so, how? Explanation of the Shift: Why or Why Not AFC No shift. Fix costs stay the same, regardless of quantity. Fixed cost is calculated as Fixed Cost/Quantity. Since fixed costs remain unchanged, AFC stays the same for each quantity. MC Shifts up. Since the biodegradable cups are more expensive, the…
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Text book image
Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:9781337613040
Author:Tucker
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Micro Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:9781337613064
Author:Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher:Cengage,
Text book image
Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:9781337617406
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506893
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning