To explain the reason behind people stuffing themselves in all-you-can-eat buffet with the help of utility and

Explanation of Solution
Consumer preferences are affected by their experiences, religion, and upbringing.
The theory of
Utility is defined as the ability of a good to satisfy a want or the satisfaction that the consumer receives from the goods they consume.
In utility analysis, there are 2 analysis introduced by two different economists. Both theories assume that preferences are rational and every consumer tries to maximize their satisfaction from consuming goods and services.
The first analysis is Cardinal Utility (
Here, utility is measurable in a cardinal sense.
The second one is the Ordinal Utility (Indifference Curve Analysis). This only ranks the utility received from consumption of various amounts of a good or baskets of goods.
The utility is measurable in an ordinal sense.
Ordinal Utility process is used to ranks various consumable bundles, whereas Cardinal Utility provides an actual index or measure of satisfaction.
People stuff themselves at all-you-can-eat buffets because the marginal cost of an additional bite is zero at any level.
From the perspective of utility, the additional utility derived from an additional bite should be zero. Until it becomes zero, people keep consuming the good.
From the perspective of demand, they consume food at buffets till the point where the demand curve intersects the X-axis where quantity is measured. This means that the price is zero and the quantity demanded is maximized.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 4 Solutions
ESSENTIALS OF ECONOMICS
- Answerarrow_forwardM” method Given the following model, solve by the method of “M”. (see image)arrow_forwardAs indicated in the attached image, U.S. earnings for high- and low-skill workers as measured by educational attainment began diverging in the 1980s. The remaining questions in this problem set use the model for the labor market developed in class to walk through potential explanations for this trend. 1. Assume that there are just two types of workers, low- and high-skill. As a result, there are two labor markets: supply and demand for low-skill workers and supply and demand for high-skill workers. Using two carefully drawn labor-market figures, show that an increase in the demand for high skill workers can explain an increase in the relative wage of high-skill workers. 2. Using the same assumptions as in the previous question, use two carefully drawn labor-market figures to show that an increase in the supply of low-skill workers can explain an increase in the relative wage of high-skill workers.arrow_forward
- Published in 1980, the book Free to Choose discusses how economists Milton Friedman and Rose Friedman proposed a one-sided view of the benefits of a voucher system. However, there are other economists who disagree about the potential effects of a voucher system.arrow_forwardThe following diagram illustrates the demand and marginal revenue curves facing a monopoly in an industry with no economies or diseconomies of scale. In the short and long run, MC = ATC. a. Calculate the values of profit, consumer surplus, and deadweight loss, and illustrate these on the graph. b. Repeat the calculations in part a, but now assume the monopoly is able to practice perfect price discrimination.arrow_forwardThe projects under the 'Build, Build, Build' program: how these projects improve connectivity and ease of doing business in the Philippines?arrow_forward
- Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage LearningMicroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning





