The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson and the reason why he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1Q

To determine

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson and the reason why he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1Q

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Explanation of Solution

In J.J Thompson’s Plum pudding model for the structure of atom, he proposed that electrons (negatively charge particles) are embedded in a uniform positively charged mass, similarly as raisins in a plum pudding and he also said that electric force on electrons is also zero and they do not move rapidly.

Electromagnetic radiations are caused when the electrons oscillate or vibrate when atom is heated. The frequency of emission lies in visible region. But in reality spectrum of hydrogen atom contains, infrared region, visible region and ultraviolet region. Thompson model could not predict spectrum of hydrogen.

Thompson could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Conclusion:

Thus, the experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Four capacitors are connected as shown in the figure below. (Let C = 12.0 μF.) a C 3.00 με Hh. 6.00 με 20.0 με HE (a) Find the equivalent capacitance between points a and b. 5.92 HF (b) Calculate the charge on each capacitor, taking AV ab = 16.0 V. 20.0 uF capacitor 94.7 6.00 uF capacitor 67.6 32.14 3.00 µF capacitor capacitor C ☑ με με The 3 µF and 12.0 uF capacitors are in series and that combination is in parallel with the 6 μF capacitor. What quantity is the same for capacitors in parallel? μC 32.14 ☑ You are correct that the charge on this capacitor will be the same as the charge on the 3 μF capacitor. μC

In the pivot assignment, we observed waves moving on a string stretched by hanging weights. We noticed that certain frequencies produced standing waves. One such situation is shown below: 0 ст Direct Measurement ©2015 Peter Bohacek I. 20 0 cm 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Which Harmonic is this? Do NOT include units! What is the wavelength of this wave in cm with only no decimal places? If the speed of this wave is 2500 cm/s, what is the frequency of this harmonic (in Hz, with NO decimal places)?

Four capacitors are connected as shown in the figure below. (Let C = 12.0 µF.) A circuit consists of four capacitors. It begins at point a before the wire splits in two directions. On the upper split, there is a capacitor C followed by a 3.00 µF capacitor. On the lower split, there is a 6.00 µF capacitor. The two splits reconnect and are followed by a 20.0 µF capacitor, which is then followed by point b. (a) Find the equivalent capacitance between points a and b. µF(b) Calculate the charge on each capacitor, taking ΔVab = 16.0 V. 20.0 µF capacitor µC 6.00 µF capacitor µC 3.00 µF capacitor µC capacitor C µC

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1Q

To determine

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson and the reason why he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1Q

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Explanation of Solution

In J.J Thompson’s Plum pudding model for the structure of atom, he proposed that electrons (negatively charge particles) are embedded in a uniform positively charged mass, similarly as raisins in a plum pudding and he also said that electric force on electrons is also zero and they do not move rapidly.

Electromagnetic radiations are caused when the electrons oscillate or vibrate when atom is heated. The frequency of emission lies in visible region. But in reality spectrum of hydrogen atom contains, infrared region, visible region and ultraviolet region. Thompson model could not predict spectrum of hydrogen.

Thompson could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Conclusion:

Thus, the experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1Q

To determine

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson and the reason why he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1Q

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Explanation of Solution

In J.J Thompson’s Plum pudding model for the structure of atom, he proposed that electrons (negatively charge particles) are embedded in a uniform positively charged mass, similarly as raisins in a plum pudding and he also said that electric force on electrons is also zero and they do not move rapidly.

Electromagnetic radiations are caused when the electrons oscillate or vibrate when atom is heated. The frequency of emission lies in visible region. But in reality spectrum of hydrogen atom contains, infrared region, visible region and ultraviolet region. Thompson model could not predict spectrum of hydrogen.

Thompson could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Conclusion:

Thus, the experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1Q

To determine

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson and the reason why he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1Q

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Explanation of Solution

In J.J Thompson’s Plum pudding model for the structure of atom, he proposed that electrons (negatively charge particles) are embedded in a uniform positively charged mass, similarly as raisins in a plum pudding and he also said that electric force on electrons is also zero and they do not move rapidly.

Electromagnetic radiations are caused when the electrons oscillate or vibrate when atom is heated. The frequency of emission lies in visible region. But in reality spectrum of hydrogen atom contains, infrared region, visible region and ultraviolet region. Thompson model could not predict spectrum of hydrogen.

Thompson could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Conclusion:

Thus, the experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 4, Problem 1Q

To determine

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson and the reason why he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1Q

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Explanation of Solution

In J.J Thompson’s Plum pudding model for the structure of atom, he proposed that electrons (negatively charge particles) are embedded in a uniform positively charged mass, similarly as raisins in a plum pudding and he also said that electric force on electrons is also zero and they do not move rapidly.

Electromagnetic radiations are caused when the electrons oscillate or vibrate when atom is heated. The frequency of emission lies in visible region. But in reality spectrum of hydrogen atom contains, infrared region, visible region and ultraviolet region. Thompson model could not predict spectrum of hydrogen.

Thompson could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Conclusion:

Thus, the experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Answer 6

Chapter 4, Problem 1Q

To determine

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson and the reason why he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1Q

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Explanation of Solution

In J.J Thompson’s Plum pudding model for the structure of atom, he proposed that electrons (negatively charge particles) are embedded in a uniform positively charged mass, similarly as raisins in a plum pudding and he also said that electric force on electrons is also zero and they do not move rapidly.

Electromagnetic radiations are caused when the electrons oscillate or vibrate when atom is heated. The frequency of emission lies in visible region. But in reality spectrum of hydrogen atom contains, infrared region, visible region and ultraviolet region. Thompson model could not predict spectrum of hydrogen.

Thompson could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Conclusion:

Thus, the experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Answer 7

Chapter 4, Problem 1Q

To determine

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson and the reason why he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1Q

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Explanation of Solution

In J.J Thompson’s Plum pudding model for the structure of atom, he proposed that electrons (negatively charge particles) are embedded in a uniform positively charged mass, similarly as raisins in a plum pudding and he also said that electric force on electrons is also zero and they do not move rapidly.

Electromagnetic radiations are caused when the electrons oscillate or vibrate when atom is heated. The frequency of emission lies in visible region. But in reality spectrum of hydrogen atom contains, infrared region, visible region and ultraviolet region. Thompson model could not predict spectrum of hydrogen.

Thompson could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Conclusion:

Thus, the experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson is light spectrum of hydrogen and he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work because according to his plum-pudding model there is no Coulomb force of attraction between any charges.

Answer 12

Ch. 4 - Prob. 1Q Ch. 4 - Prob. 2Q Ch. 4 - Prob. 3Q Ch. 4 - Prob. 4Q Ch. 4 - Prob. 5Q Ch. 4 - Prob. 6Q Ch. 4 - Prob. 7Q Ch. 4 - Prob. 8Q Ch. 4 - Prob. 9Q Ch. 4 - Prob. 10Q

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson and the reason why he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work.

Concept explainers

The experimental data which is not predicted by Thompson and the reason why he could not make the planetary model of Rutherford- Bohr work.

Answer to Problem 1Q

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 4 Solutions