
The reason for the differences between the modern Marsupials in Australia to that of the Africa, although their ancestors had direct fossil links using the break up of Pangaea.

Answer to Problem 1GST
The differences between the modern Marsupials in Australia to that of the Africa, although their ancestors had direct fossil links are because of their evolvement in distantly related groups over a long period of time acquiring new unique characters of their own.
Explanation of Solution
Pangaea is a vast super continent that existed in the early earth's history. This supercontinent broke up around 200 million years ago during the Triassic period of Mesozoic era.
During the break up of Pangaea, many land masses were broken and drifted across the ocean. This gave rise to many continents and oceans. Africa and Australia, which were once united together also drifted apart.
When they were a single land mass, the origin of both Australian Marsupials and the African Marsupials were the same. Later, after the separation of land, they evolved in different ecological conditions with different adaptations. This made them entirely different from each other.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 4 Solutions
Earth Science (nasta Edition) 15th Edition
- due today at 2pm, the problems have been done already, is there anyway you can draw the diagrams i was supposed to for each problem because I am confused on how to draw themarrow_forwarddue today at 2pm, the problem have been done already, is there anyway you can draw the diagrams i was supposed to for this because I am confused on how to draw themarrow_forwardTHIS IS DUE AT 2PM TODAY, I JUST NEED HELP WITH THE DRAWINGS THATS IT CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP MEarrow_forward
- C) A thermometer D A seismometer 23 A student conducted an investigation to determine the effect of water temperature on the amount of sugar that dissolves in a beaker of water. Identify components for trial 1 of this investigation. DRAG & DROP THE ANSWER Note: Use CTRL+D to drag the option via keyboard Constant DV IV Trial 1 Beaker Number Amount of Temperature of Temperature of Amount of Suga Water (mL) Sugar (°C) Water (°C) Dissolved (g) 1 100 20 5 185 2 100 20 10 189 20 15 194 204arrow_forwarddue today at 2pm, the problem have been done already, is there anyway you can draw the diagrams i was supposed to for this because I am confused on how to draw themarrow_forward1. Calculate the elevation of the water table at each well location and write the approximate elevation on the line next to each well. Next, use a colored pencil to draw smooth 10-foot contours that show the shape of the water table. (Start with the 1160-foot contour.) Use a pencil of a different color to draw arrows on the map to indicate the direction of the slope of the water table. a. Toward which direction (downward) does the water table slope? b. Referring to the site of the proposed water well, at approximately what depth below the surface should the proposed well intersect the water table? 2. Assume that a dye was put into well A on May 10, 2017, and detected in well B on May 25, 2018. What was the rate of groundwater movement between the two wells, in centimeters per day? (Hint: Convert feet to centimeters.)Velocity:_____________centimeters per dayarrow_forward
- PART 1 Activity 8.7 Ground Subsidence (Figure 8.7) 1. What is the general relationship between ground subsidence and the level of water in the well? 2. What was the total ground subsidence, and what was the total drop in the level of water in the well during the period shown on the graph?Total ground subsidence: —--feetTotal drop in well level: —-- feet 3. During the period shown on the graph, on aver-age, about how much land subsidence occurred with each 20-foot decrease in the water level in the well: 1 foot, 5 feet, or 10 feet?Subsidence: about—----foot/feet 4. Was the ground subsidence that occurred between 1930 and 1950 less or more than the subsidence that occurred between 1950 and 1970?Ground subsidence from 1930 to 1950 was—----than that from 1950 to 1970. 5. Notice that minimal subsidence occurred from 1935 to 1950. Refer to the well water level during the same period of time and suggest a possible reason for the reduced rate of subsidence. PART 2 Activity 8.8 Examining a…arrow_forwardPART 1 Activity 8.7 Ground Subsidence (Figure 8.7) 1. What is the general relationship between ground subsidence and the level of water in the well? 2. What was the total ground subsidence, and what was the total drop in the level of water in the well during the period shown on the graph?Total ground subsidence: —--feetTotal drop in well level: —-- feet 3. During the period shown on the graph, on aver-age, about how much land subsidence occurred with each 20-foot decrease in the water level in the well: 1 foot, 5 feet, or 10 feet?Subsidence: about—----foot/feet 4. Was the ground subsidence that occurred between 1930 and 1950 less or more than the subsidence that occurred between 1950 and 1970?Ground subsidence from 1930 to 1950 was—----than that from 1950 to 1970. 5. Notice that minimal subsidence occurred from 1935 to 1950. Refer to the well water level during the same period of time and suggest a possible reason for the reduced rate of subsidence. PART 2 Activity 8.8 Examining a…arrow_forwardN (120') -1180- (120') (105') 0 50 100 feet 1160- -1140- A (100') B (90') (80) Proposed well -1120. (95) (80°) (80') 1100 Well location (Depth to top of water table) A Figure 8.14 Hypothetical topographic map showing the locations of several water wells. The numbers in parentheses indicate the depth of the water table below the surface in each well.arrow_forward
- Applications and Investigations in Earth Science ...Earth ScienceISBN:9780134746241Author:Edward J. Tarbuck, Frederick K. Lutgens, Dennis G. TasaPublisher:PEARSONExercises for Weather & Climate (9th Edition)Earth ScienceISBN:9780134041360Author:Greg CarbonePublisher:PEARSONEnvironmental ScienceEarth ScienceISBN:9781260153125Author:William P Cunningham Prof., Mary Ann Cunningham ProfessorPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
- Earth Science (15th Edition)Earth ScienceISBN:9780134543536Author:Edward J. Tarbuck, Frederick K. Lutgens, Dennis G. TasaPublisher:PEARSONEnvironmental Science (MindTap Course List)Earth ScienceISBN:9781337569613Author:G. Tyler Miller, Scott SpoolmanPublisher:Cengage LearningPhysical GeologyEarth ScienceISBN:9781259916823Author:Plummer, Charles C., CARLSON, Diane H., Hammersley, LisaPublisher:Mcgraw-hill Education,





