
The total surplus with $30 market

Explanation of Solution
Table 1 shows the market price spent and the maximum wiliness to pay by the different potential buyers as follows:
Table 1
Potential buyers | Maximum willingness to pay | Market price |
B | $60 | $30 |
J | 45 | 30 |
S | 35 | 30 |
Jam | 25 | 30 |
F | 10 | 30 |
From this table, it is clear that the maximum willingness to pay of “Jam” and “F” is less than the market price or actual pay, and they would not consume at the market price. Therefore, they can be ignored from the total
The calculation of consumer surplus with market price $30 is given as follows:
The total consumer surplus is 50.
Table 2 shows the market price spent and the minimum willingness to sell by the different potential buyers as follows:
Table 2
Potential buyers | Minimum willingness to sell | Market price |
F | $60 | $30 |
B | 45 | 30 |
A | 35 | 30 |
P | 25 | 30 |
Ali | 10 | 30 |
From this table, it is clear that the minimum willingness to sell price of “F“, “B”, and “A” is greater than the market price or actual pay. Therefore, they will not be ready to sell the product with the given market price. Thus, they can be ignored from the total
The calculation of producer surplus with market price $30 is given as follows:
The total producer surplus is $25.
The total surplus can be calculated as follows:
The total surplus is $75.
Table 3 shows the market price spent and the maximum wiliness to pay by the different potential buyers as follows:
Table 3
Potential buyers | Maximum willingness to pay | Market price |
B | $60 | $15 |
J | 45 | 15 |
S | 35 | 15 |
Jam | 25 | 15 |
F | 10 | 15 |
From this table, it is clear that the maximum willingness to pay for “F” is less than the market price or actual pay, and he would not consume at the market price. Therefore, he can be ignored from the total consumer surplus calculation.
the calculation of consumer surplus with market price $15 is given as follows:
The total consumer surplus is 105.
Table 1 shows the market price spent and the minimum willingness to sell by the different potential buyers as follows:
Table 4
Potential buyers | Minimum willingness to sell | Market price |
F | $60 | 15 |
B | 45 | 15 |
A | 35 | 15 |
P | 25 | 15 |
Ali | 10 | 15 |
From this table, it is clear that the minimum willingness to sell price of “F“, “B”, “A”, and “F” is greater than the market price or actual pay. Therefore, they will not be ready to sell the product with the given market price. Thus, they can be ignored from the total producer surplus calculation.
The calculation of producer surplus with market price $15 is given as follows:
The total producer surplus is $5.
The total surplus can be calculated as follows:
Total surplus is $110.
Consumer surplus: Consumer surplus is the difference between the highest willing price of a consumer and the actual price that the consumer pays.
Producer surplus: It is the difference between the lowest willing price accepted by the producer and the actual price received by the producer.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 3 Solutions
MICROECONOMICS FOR TODAY (LL)-W/MINDTAP
- As indicated in the attached image, U.S. earnings for high- and low-skill workers as measured by educational attainment began diverging in the 1980s. The remaining questions in this problem set use the model for the labor market developed in class to walk through potential explanations for this trend. 1. Assume that there are just two types of workers, low- and high-skill. As a result, there are two labor markets: supply and demand for low-skill workers and supply and demand for high-skill workers. Using two carefully drawn labor-market figures, show that an increase in the demand for high skill workers can explain an increase in the relative wage of high-skill workers. 2. Using the same assumptions as in the previous question, use two carefully drawn labor-market figures to show that an increase in the supply of low-skill workers can explain an increase in the relative wage of high-skill workers.arrow_forwardPublished in 1980, the book Free to Choose discusses how economists Milton Friedman and Rose Friedman proposed a one-sided view of the benefits of a voucher system. However, there are other economists who disagree about the potential effects of a voucher system.arrow_forwardThe following diagram illustrates the demand and marginal revenue curves facing a monopoly in an industry with no economies or diseconomies of scale. In the short and long run, MC = ATC. a. Calculate the values of profit, consumer surplus, and deadweight loss, and illustrate these on the graph. b. Repeat the calculations in part a, but now assume the monopoly is able to practice perfect price discrimination.arrow_forward
- how commond economies relate to principle Of Economics ?arrow_forwardCritically analyse the five (5) characteristics of Ubuntu and provide examples of how they apply to the National Health Insurance (NHI) in South Africa.arrow_forwardCritically analyse the five (5) characteristics of Ubuntu and provide examples of how they apply to the National Health Insurance (NHI) in South Africa.arrow_forward
- Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningExploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc





