The comparative advantage of countries.
Answer to Problem 2P
a. New Zealand- The cost of producing 1 Apple is 0.25 plums and the cost of producing 1 plum is 4 Apples.
Spain- The cost of producing 1 Apple is 1 plum and the cost of producing 1 plum is 1 Apple.
b. New Zealand should produce apples and Spain should produce plums.
c. Graph
d. The total gain of Apples is 20 and the total gain of plums is 10.
Explanation of Solution
The comparative advantage is the advantage that the country has over the competitor in the
Option (a):
In New Zealand, the production of 20 apples needs the resources which can alternatively be used for the production of 5 plums. Thus, the opportunity cost of producing 1 apple can be calculated by dividing the total units of plums given up by the total units of apples gained as follows:
Thus, the opportunity cost of producing 1 apple in New Zealand is 0.25 plum.
The opportunity cost of producing plum in New Zealand can be calculated by dividing the number of units of apples given up with the number of units of plums gained as follows:
So, the opportunity cost of producing 1 plum in New Zealand is 4 apples.
In Spain, the production of 20 apples needs the resources which can alternatively be used for the production of 20 plums. Thus, the opportunity cost of producing 1 apple can be calculated by dividing the total units of plums given up by the total units of apples gained as follows:
Thus, the opportunity cost of producing 1 apple in Spain is 1 plum.
The opportunity cost of producing plum in Spain can be calculated by dividing the number of units of apples given up with the number of units of plums gained as follows:
So, the opportunity cost of producing 1 plum in Spain is 1 apple.
Option (b):
The opportunity cost of producing a unit of apple is lower in New Zealand (0.25 Plum) compared to Spain (1 Plum). Thus, New Zealand should specialize in the production of apples.
The opportunity cost of producing a unit of plum is lower in Spain (1 Apple) compared to that in New Zealand (4 Apples). Thus, Spain should specialize in the production of plums.
Option (c):
Before the trade, the
According to the terms of trade of
Similarly, Spain can have 2 apples for 1 plum in the international trade which will increase their total possible consumption of apples from 60 million bushels to 120 million bushels. Thus, the vertical intercept of the Spain's production possibility curve will increase to 120 million bushels. So, the slope of the production possibility curve of Spain will decrease from -1 to -0.5.
The changes are shown in the diagram as follows:
Option (d):
The mixed product of New Zealand is B and of Spain is S. According to the table, the total output of apples in New Zealand at this mixed product is 20 million bushels and the output of plums is 10 million bushels. Similarly, at the given output combination S of Spain, the total output of apples is 20 million bushes and of plums is 40 million bushels.
Thus, the total output of the apple and plum before the trade can be calculated by adding the individual quantities of apples that are produced in New Zealand and Spain together are as follows:
Thus, the total output of apples before the trade was 40 million bushels.
Similarly, the total output of plums can be calculated by adding together each country’s outputs are as follows:
Thus, the total output of plums before the trade was 50 million bushels.
After the specialization by New Zealand in the production of apples, the total output of apples increased to 60 million bushels. Similarly, the specialization by Spain in the production of plums increased the total output of plums to 60 million bushels. Thus, total
Thus, the total output gain of apples is 20 million bushels.
Similarly, the total output gain in the case of plums can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the total output gain in plums is 10 million bushels.
Concept introduction:
Comparative advantage: It is the ability of the producer, firm or a country to produce a good or service at the lowest opportunity cost of production than the competitors.
Specialization: It is the process of identifying the product in which, the country has the comparative advantage in the form of lower opportunity cost of production. Thus, they can focus on the production of that commodity which will increase the output and they can engage in an international exchange in order to obtain the products in which they don’t have any comparative advantage.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 38 Solutions
Economics: Principles, Problems, & Policies (McGraw-Hill Series in Economics) - Standalone book
- How would you answer the question in the News Wire “Future Living Standards”? Why?arrow_forwardal Problems (v) T (ix) F 1. Out of total number of 2807 women, who were interviewed for employment in a textile factory, 912 were from textile areas and the rest from non-textile areas. Amongst the married women, who belonged to textile areas, 347 were having some work experience and 173 did not have work experience, while for non-textile areas the corresponding figures were 199 and 670 respectively. The total number of women having no experience was 1841 of whom 311 resided in textile areas. Of the total number of women, 1418 were unmarried and of these the number of women having experience in the textile and non-textile areas was 254 and 166 respectively. Tabulate the above information. [CA. (Foundation), May 2000 Exactly (14) of the total employees of a sugar mill were these were married and one-halfarrow_forwardHow did Jennifer Lopez use free enterprise to become successful ?arrow_forward
- An actuary analyzes a company’s annual personal auto claims, M and annual commercialauto claims, N . The analysis reveals that V ar(M ) = 1600, V ar(N ) = 900, and thecorrelation between M and N is ρ = 0.64. Compute V ar(M + N ).arrow_forwardDon't used hand raitingarrow_forwardAnswer in step by step with explanation. Don't use Ai.arrow_forward
- Use the figure below to answer the following question. Let I represent Income when healthy, let I represent income when ill. Let E [I] represent expected income for a given probability (p) of falling ill. Utility у в ULI income Is есте IM The actuarially fair & partial contract is represented by Point X × OB A Yarrow_forwardSuppose that there is a 25% chance Riju is injured and earns $180,000, and a 75% chance she stays healthy and will earn $900,000. Suppose further that her utility function is the following: U = (Income) ³. Riju's utility if she earns $180,000 is _ and her utility if she earns $900,000 is. X 56.46; 169.38 56.46; 96.55 96.55; 56.46 40.00; 200.00 169.38; 56.46arrow_forwardUse the figure below to answer the following question. Let là represent Income when healthy, let Is represent income when ill. Let E[I], represent expected income for a given probability (p) of falling ill. Utility & B естве IH S Point D represents ☑ actuarially fair & full contract actuarially fair & partial contract O actuarially unfair & full contract uninsurance incomearrow_forward
- Suppose that there is a 25% chance Riju is injured and earns $180,000, and a 75% chance she stays healthy and will earn $900,000. Suppose further that her utility function is the following: U = (Income). Riju is risk. She will prefer (given the same expected income). averse; no insurance to actuarially fair and full insurance lover; actuarially fair and full insurance to no insurance averse; actuarially fair and full insurance to no insurance neutral; he will be indifferent between actuarially fair and full insurance to no insurance lover; no insurance to actuarially fair and full insurancearrow_forward19. (20 points in total) Suppose that the market demand curve is p = 80 - 8Qd, where p is the price per unit and Qd is the number of units demanded per week, and the market supply curve is p = 5+7Qs, where Q5 is the quantity supplied per week. a. b. C. d. e. Calculate the equilibrium price and quantity for a competitive market in which there is no market failure. Draw a diagram that includes the demand and supply curves, the values of the vertical- axis intercepts, and the competitive equilibrium quantity and price. Label the curves, axes and areas. Calculate both the marginal willingness to pay and the total willingness to pay for the equilibrium quantity. Calculate both the marginal cost of the equilibrium quantity and variable cost of producing the equilibrium quantity. Calculate the total surplus. How is the value of total surplus related to your calculations in parts c and d?arrow_forwardPlease answer all parts of the questionarrow_forward
- Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, IncEssentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningBrief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...EconomicsISBN:9781337091985Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning