
Subpart (a):
Level of export.
Subpart (a):

Explanation of Solution
The level of export for each of the last five years of 2000 is tabulated below:
Table 1
YEAR | EXPGSCA |
1996 | 986.033 |
1997 | 1103.500 |
1998 | 1129.281 |
1999 | 1159.146 |
2000 | 1258.433 |
From Table 1, it can be inferred that the exports increase every year.
Concept introduction:
Export: Export refers to a trading of goods and services from a domestic country to a foreign country.
Subpart (b):
Level of import.
Subpart (b):

Explanation of Solution
The level of import for each of the last five years of 2000 is given in Table 2.
Table 2
YEAR | IMPGSCA |
1996 | 1100.592 |
1997 | 1248.825 |
1998 | 1394.798 |
1999 | 1536.232 |
2000 | 1736.215 |
From Table 2, it can be inferred that the imports increase every year.
Concept introduction:
Import: Import refers to the goods and services that are bought domestically but are produced in foreign countries.
Subpart (c):
Subpart (c):

Explanation of Solution
The trade deficit is calculated using the following equation:
Since the value of import is greater than that of exports, a trade deficit exists. Substitute the values in equation (1) to calculate the trade deficit for each year as follows:
The trade deficit for 2000 is 477.782.
Similarly, by substituting the values in equation (1), the trade deficit for each year is calculated and tabulated below:
Table 3
YEAR | TRADE DEFICIT |
1996 | 114.559 |
1997 | 145.325 |
1998 | 265.517 |
1999 | 377.086 |
2000 | 477.782 |
Concept introduction:
Trade deficit: Trade deficit is the situation where the country imports more goods and services than they export. It is the situation of negative trade balance, which means that the outflows of capital as payments to the imports are higher than the inflow of capital as revenue for the exports.
Subpart (d):
Trade deficit as a percentage of
Subpart (d):

Explanation of Solution
The trade deficit as a percentage of GDP is calculated using the following equation:
Substituting the values in equation (2), the trade deficit as a percentage of GDP for each year is calculated as follows:
The trade deficit as a percentage of GDP for 2000 is 3.80%.
Similarly, substituting values in equation (2), the trade deficit as a percentage of GDP for each of the last five years of 2000 is calculated and tabulated below:
Table 4
Year | Trade Deficit | GDPSCA | Trade Deficit as % Of GDP |
1996 | 114.559 | 10560.976 | 1.08% |
1997 | 145.325 | 11034.850 | 1.32% |
1998 | 265.517 | 11525.891 | 2.30% |
1999 | 377.086 | 12065.902 | 3.13% |
2000 | 477.782 | 12559.660 | 3.80% |
During recessions, that is, in years when the GDP falls from the previous year (starting Dec 2007 to 2009), the trade deficit tends to fall. Based on the information available in the given website, this can be tabulated as follows:
Table 5
Year | EXPGSCA | IMPGSCA | Trade deficit | GDPSCA |
2007 | 1646.394 | 2359.012 | 712.62 | 14873.734 |
2008 | 1740.825 | 2298.645 | 557.82 | 14830.359 |
2009 | 1587.741 | 1983.177 | 395.44 | 14418.738 |
2010 | 1776.595 | 2235.350 | 458.76 | 14783.809 |
The fall in trade deficit in recession may be attributed to a larger fall in imports of consumers and capital goods than in exports. Export is seen as more stable than imports during the recession, as per Table 5.
Concept introduction:
Trade deficit: Trade deficit is the situation where the country imports more goods and services than what they export. It is the situation of negative trade balance, which means that the outflows of capital as payments to the imports are higher than the inflow of capital as revenue for the exports.
GDP (Gross Domestic Product): Gross domestic product refers to the value of total goods and services produced in the given period of time, within the boundaries.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 38 Solutions
Modern Principles of Economics
- PART II: Multipart Problems wood or solem of triflussd aidi 1. Assume that a society has a polluting industry comprising two firms, where the industry-level marginal abatement cost curve is given by: MAC = 24 - ()E and the marginal damage function is given by: MDF = 2E. What is the efficient level of emissions? b. What constant per-unit emissions tax could achieve the efficient emissions level? points) c. What is the net benefit to society of moving from the unregulated emissions level to the efficient level? In response to industry complaints about the costs of the tax, a cap-and-trade program is proposed. The marginal abatement cost curves for the two firms are given by: MAC=24-E and MAC2 = 24-2E2. d. How could a cap-and-trade program that achieves the same level of emissions as the tax be designed to reduce the costs of regulation to the two firms?arrow_forwardOnly #4 please, Use a graph please if needed to help provearrow_forwarda-carrow_forward
- For these questions, you must state "true," "false," or "uncertain" and argue your case (roughly 3 to 5 sentences). When appropriate, the use of graphs will make for stronger answers. Credit will depend entirely on the quality of your explanation. 1. If the industry facing regulation for its pollutant emissions has a lot of political capital, direct regulatory intervention will be more viable than an emissions tax to address this market failure. 2. A stated-preference method will provide a measure of the value of Komodo dragons that is more accurate than the value estimated through application of the travel cost model to visitation data for Komodo National Park in Indonesia. 3. A correlation between community demographics and the present location of polluting facilities is sufficient to claim a violation of distributive justice. olsvrc Q 4. When the damages from pollution are uncertain, a price-based mechanism is best equipped to manage the costs of the regulator's imperfect…arrow_forwardFor environmental economics, question number 2 only please-- thank you!arrow_forwardFor these questions, you must state "true," "false," or "uncertain" and argue your case (roughly 3 to 5 sentences). When appropriate, the use of graphs will make for stronger answers. Credit will depend entirely on the quality of your explanation. 1. If the industry facing regulation for its pollutant emissions has a lot of political capital, direct regulatory intervention will be more viable than an emissions tax to address this market failure. cullog iba linevoz ve bubivorearrow_forward
- Exercise 3 The production function of a firm is described by the following equation Q=10,000-3L2 where L stands for the units of labour. a) Draw a graph for this equation. Use the quantity produced in the y-axis, and the units of labour in the x-axis. b) What is the maximum production level? c) How many units of labour are needed at that point? d) Provide one reference with you answer.arrow_forwardExercise 1 Consider the market supply curve which passes through the intercept and from which the market equilibrium data is known, this is, the price and quantity of equilibrium PE=50 and QE=2000. Considering those two points, find the equation of the supply. Draw a graph of this line. Provide one reference with your answer. Exercise 2 Considering the previous supply line, determine if the following demand function corresponds to the market demand equilibrium stated above. QD=3000-2p.arrow_forwardConsider the market supply curve which passes through the intercept and from which the marketequilibrium data is known, this is, the price and quantity of equilibrium PE=50 and QE=2000.a. Considering those two points, find the equation of the supply. b. Draw a graph of this line.arrow_forward
- Government Purchases and Tax Revenues A B GDP T₂ Refer to the diagram. Discretionary fiscal policy designed to slow the economy is illustrated by Multiple Choice the shift of curve T₁ to T2. a movement from d to balong curve T₁.arrow_forwardSection III: Empirical Findings: Descriptive Statistics and inferential statistics………………..40% Descriptive statistics provide details about the Y variable, based on the sample for the 10-year period. Here, you use Excell or manually compute Mean or the average income per capita. Interpret the meaning of average income per capita. Draw the line chart showing the educational performance over the time-period of your study. Label the Vertical axis as Y performance and X axis as the explanatory variable (X1) . Do the same thing between Y and X2 Empirical/ Inferential Statistics: Here, use the sample information to perform the following: Draw the Scatter plot and impose the trend line: showing the Y variable and explanatory variables ( X1). Draw the scatter plot and impose the tend line: Showing Y and X2. Does your evidence (data) support your theory? Refer to the trend line: Is the relationship positive or negative as expected? Based on the data sheet below: Years Y ( per…arrow_forwardSection III: Empirical Findings: Descriptive Statistics and inferential statistics………………..40% Descriptive statistics provide details about the Y variable, based on the sample for the 10-year period. Here, you use Excell or manually compute Mean or the average income per capita. Interpret the meaning of average income per capita. Draw the line chart showing the educational performance over the time-period of your study. Label the Vertical axis as Y performance and X axis as the explanatory variable (X1) . Do the same thing between Y and X2 Empirical/ Inferential Statistics: Here, use the sample information to perform the following: Draw the Scatter plot and impose the trend line: showing the Y variable and explanatory variables ( X1). Draw the scatter plot and impose the tend line: Showing Y and X2. Does your evidence (data) support your theory? Refer to the trend line: Is the relationship positive or negative as expected? Create graphs based on table below; Years Y ( per…arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





