
Subpart (a):
Level of export.
Subpart (a):

Explanation of Solution
The level of export for each of the last five years of 2000 is tabulated below:
Table 1
YEAR | EXPGSCA |
1996 | 986.033 |
1997 | 1103.500 |
1998 | 1129.281 |
1999 | 1159.146 |
2000 | 1258.433 |
From Table 1, it can be inferred that the exports increase every year.
Concept introduction:
Export: Export refers to a trading of goods and services from a domestic country to a foreign country.
Subpart (b):
Level of import.
Subpart (b):

Explanation of Solution
The level of import for each of the last five years of 2000 is given in Table 2.
Table 2
YEAR | IMPGSCA |
1996 | 1100.592 |
1997 | 1248.825 |
1998 | 1394.798 |
1999 | 1536.232 |
2000 | 1736.215 |
From Table 2, it can be inferred that the imports increase every year.
Concept introduction:
Import: Import refers to the goods and services that are bought domestically but are produced in foreign countries.
Subpart (c):
Subpart (c):

Explanation of Solution
The trade deficit is calculated using the following equation:
Since the value of import is greater than that of exports, a trade deficit exists. Substitute the values in equation (1) to calculate the trade deficit for each year as follows:
The trade deficit for 2000 is 477.782.
Similarly, by substituting the values in equation (1), the trade deficit for each year is calculated and tabulated below:
Table 3
YEAR | TRADE DEFICIT |
1996 | 114.559 |
1997 | 145.325 |
1998 | 265.517 |
1999 | 377.086 |
2000 | 477.782 |
Concept introduction:
Trade deficit: Trade deficit is the situation where the country imports more goods and services than they export. It is the situation of negative trade balance, which means that the outflows of capital as payments to the imports are higher than the inflow of capital as revenue for the exports.
Subpart (d):
Trade deficit as a percentage of
Subpart (d):

Explanation of Solution
The trade deficit as a percentage of GDP is calculated using the following equation:
Substituting the values in equation (2), the trade deficit as a percentage of GDP for each year is calculated as follows:
The trade deficit as a percentage of GDP for 2000 is 3.80%.
Similarly, substituting values in equation (2), the trade deficit as a percentage of GDP for each of the last five years of 2000 is calculated and tabulated below:
Table 4
Year | Trade Deficit | GDPSCA | Trade Deficit as % Of GDP |
1996 | 114.559 | 10560.976 | 1.08% |
1997 | 145.325 | 11034.850 | 1.32% |
1998 | 265.517 | 11525.891 | 2.30% |
1999 | 377.086 | 12065.902 | 3.13% |
2000 | 477.782 | 12559.660 | 3.80% |
During recessions, that is, in years when the GDP falls from the previous year (starting Dec 2007 to 2009), the trade deficit tends to fall. Based on the information available in the given website, this can be tabulated as follows:
Table 5
Year | EXPGSCA | IMPGSCA | Trade deficit | GDPSCA |
2007 | 1646.394 | 2359.012 | 712.62 | 14873.734 |
2008 | 1740.825 | 2298.645 | 557.82 | 14830.359 |
2009 | 1587.741 | 1983.177 | 395.44 | 14418.738 |
2010 | 1776.595 | 2235.350 | 458.76 | 14783.809 |
The fall in trade deficit in recession may be attributed to a larger fall in imports of consumers and capital goods than in exports. Export is seen as more stable than imports during the recession, as per Table 5.
Concept introduction:
Trade deficit: Trade deficit is the situation where the country imports more goods and services than what they export. It is the situation of negative trade balance, which means that the outflows of capital as payments to the imports are higher than the inflow of capital as revenue for the exports.
GDP (Gross Domestic Product): Gross domestic product refers to the value of total goods and services produced in the given period of time, within the boundaries.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 38 Solutions
EBK MODERN PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS
- What are the 4 main parts of circular diagram?arrow_forwardWhat is absolute advantage?arrow_forwardGood Day, Kindly requesting assistance with this also Briefly explain how elasticity affects government health policies in the following cases:● Taxes on unhealthy products (cigarettes, alcohol, sugary drinks)● Subsidizing Preventive Care (e.g., vaccines, screenings)● Drug Price Controls & Generic Substitutions● Co-Payments & Insurance Designarrow_forward
- Good Day, Kindly assist with the following query: ● Cost–benefit Analysis● Cost-effectiveness analysis● Cost–utility analysis● Cost analysis or Cost Minimization Analysis For each of the following health policy questions listed below, identify and briefly explain which type of economic evaluation in question above would be most appropriate to use: ● The Ministry of Finance wants to know whether it is worth investing further resources into malaria control or building new primary schools? ● The Ministry of Health wants to compare the costs of receiving intravenous antibiotics in a hospital with receiving the same antibiotics (at the same doses) at home via a home health care service. ● The Ministry of Health wants to compare the costs and outcomes of two interventions for the treatment of early stage breast cancer: mastectomy without breast reconstruction compared to breast conserving surgery and radiotherapy (breast conservation). ● A malaria control programme wants to use economic…arrow_forwardSubstitute X=20. Can you show me how to do question 1 pleasearrow_forwardBlue Air Inc., has net sales of $740,000 and accounts receivables of $163,000. What is the firm's accounts receivables turnover?arrow_forward
- Please answer questions D-H, I have already answered A , B,C but it may help you to still solve them yourself. Thank you!arrow_forward2. A firm’s production function is given by:Q = 10KLThe unit capital and labour costs are 2 and 1 pounds respectively. The firm is contracted to produce2000 units.(a) Write out the optimisation problem of the firm. (b) Express this problem using a Lagrangian function. (c) Find values of K and L which fulfil the contract with minimal cost to the firm. (d) Calculate the total cost to the firm.arrow_forward3. Consider the following estimated regression equation, estimated using a sample of firms, where RDis total firm spending on research and development in USD ($), Revenue is total firm revenuein USD ($), and W ages is the firms’ total spending on wages in USD ($) (standard errors inparentheses):RDd = 1000(600)+ 0.5(0.1)Revenue + 1.5(0.5)W ages,(a) Interpret the coefficients on each of the explanatory variables. (b) Which of the three coefficients are statistically significant at the 5% level of significance? Howdo you know? A researcher runs a two-sided statistical test of the null hypothesis that both the coefficients onthe explanatory variables above are jointly equal to 0.25 (mathematically, that β1 = β2 = 0.25),and reports a p-value of 0.045.(c) What does this p-value mean for the outcome of the test? (d) What would an appropriate two-sided alternative hypothesis look like?arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





