Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Course List)
7th Edition
ISBN: 9781285165875
Author: N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 35, Problem 4PA
Subpart (a):
To determine
Economy’s short-run and long-run Phillips curves.
Subpart (b):
To determine
Economy’s short-run and long-run Phillips curves.
Subpart (c):
To determine
Economy’s short-run and long-run Phillips curves.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
If the economy has rational expectations and the model is sticky price model. Could you explain why the following statement true in macroeconomics?
Consider an economy that is initially in its long-run equilibrium. Suppose this economy suffers a temporary negative supply shock. If the central bank’s sole objective is to stabilize output in the short-run, then what will happen after the central bank has responded according to its objective?
A.
Inflation will be lower, output will back at its original level
B.
Inflation will be lower, output will be lower
C.
Inflation will be higher, output will be higher
D.
Inflation will be lower, output will be higher
E.
Inflation will be higher, output will be lower
F.
Inflation will be higher, output will back at its original level
a. According to the Misperceptions theory, what would be the effect of an unanticipated monetary expansion shock on real interest rate (r), real output (Y), and price level (P) in the short and in the long-run? Why? Explain with details.b. Does your answer change if the shock is expected/anticipated? Why? Show how.
Chapter 35 Solutions
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Course List)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Some commentators have argued that the Fed is running a risk with inflation in the future as a result of the recent large-scale asset purchase programs (known as QE). Although inflationary risks in the near term look still remote, their concerns with its potential negative effects on the economy may not be totally groundless. Which of the following may not justify their concerns? a. Ultra loose monetary policy as it has been may eventually lead to higher inflation.b. Lower interest rate may cause a large depreciation of the US dollar, and hence raise import prices and inflation.c. Lower interest rate may lead to asset-price bubble, raising the risk of a major eventual correction and its potential adverse effects on the economy.d. Lower interest rate may raise productivity growth that would eventually spark inflationarrow_forwardMonetary Policy: End of Chapter Problem 28a Central bankers must manage expectations. Suppose that inflation is running at 10% and the central banker would like to lower inflation to 2% without reducing real growth. What should the central banker tell the public? And at what level should the central banker set money growth? Adjust the graph to show how the central banker's policy will affect the economy, assuming people believe the central bank will do as it says. Label the new equilibrium with point b. Assume that velocity shocks are zero and that the potential growth rate is 3%. b. Suppose that the public does believe the central banker. What temptation might the central banker face? Label the equilibrium at which the economy will wind up if the central banker succumbs to this temptation with point c. c. If the central banker is not believed but follows the policy in part a, use point d to indicate where the economy will be. Use your answer to parts b and c to discuss the importance…arrow_forwardFor this question, assume that the Fed sets monetary policy according to the Taylor rule. Suppose current U.S. macroeconomic conditions are represented by the following: π < π?* and u > un. Given this information, we would expect that the Fed will: A.implement a monetary contraction. B.more information is need to answer this question. C.maintain its current stance of monetary policy. D.implement a monetary expansion. Which of the following would cause an increase in M1? A.a reduction in the required ratio of reserves to deposits B.an increase in the discount rate C.an open market operation where the Fed buys bonds D.thes all of these E.none of thesearrow_forward
- If the Fed unexpectedly shifts to a more restrictive monetary policy, which of the following will most likely occur in the short run? a. An increase in inflation b. An increase in real GDP c. An increase in unemploymentarrow_forwardIn the monetary intertemporal model, assume that money supply is always fixed. Suppose that there is an increase in real wage. How does this change affect interest rates (both real and nominal), price level, employment, total factor productivity and equilibrium output? Carefully explain your answers. b) Suppose that, in a liquidity trap, bank reserves are less liquid than government debt. If the Central Bank conducts an open market purchase of government debt, what is the effect on price level? Use an appropriate set of diagram to explain your answer.arrow_forwardThe following graph plots a short-run Phillips curve for a hypothetical economy. Show the short-run effect of a contractionary monetary policy by dragging the point along the short-run Phillips curve (SRPC) or shifting the curve to the appropriate position. Now, show the long-run effect of a contractionary monetary policy by dragging either the short-run Phillips curve (SRPC), the long-run Phillips curve (LRPC), or both. As anticipated, inflation (rises/falls) and the short-run Phillips curve shifts (downward/upward) , highlighting the cost of fighting inflation, which is (higher unemployment in the long run/temporary unemployment/lower unemployment) . Which of the following examples represents a cost of inflation? Check all that apply. -An unintended redistribution of wealth from borrowers to lenders -A general decrease in purchasing power -Increased variability of relative prices -A coffee shop’s costs to reprint its menu to reflect fluctuating pricesarrow_forward
- Monetary Policy: End of Chapter Problem Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz argued in their Monetary History of the United States that money growth and velocity usually shift in the same direction. Thus, higher growth causes optimism and slower growth causes pessimism. They believed that velocity had its own shocks as well. a. Let's run through some examples of how this might work, in a setting where the Fed wants to keep AD growth stable at 10%. To keep things simple, we will assume that the Fed can control money growth perfectly. We will also assume that a 1% change in money growth causes a 0.5% shock to velocity growth in the same direction. Using these assumptions, fill in the missing values for the following table. For each case: AD = Initial Velocity Shock + Money Growth + Velocity Shock Caused by Money Growth Round your answer to the nearest hundredth. Year 2 money growth: Year 3 money growth: 254 15 Incorrect 8 incorrect Year 2 3 Initial Velocity Shock 4% 3% 16% 8% 4% 0% Year 2…arrow_forwardA. What assumptions did Thomas Sargent make when he claimed that inflation is always and everywhere a fiscal phenomenon?" B. Why is it appropriate in the book's short-term model for the author to use the Phillips Curve as an Aggregate Supply curve? Does it capture the working of the labor market as well as an AS curve based, say, on sticky wages? C. Provide an example of the book's short-run model being based on "microfoundations."arrow_forwardStart with AS/AD and IS/MP in full employment equilibrium. Assume the is a massive positive aggregate demand shock. How would this affect AS/AD and IS/MP and prices and output relative to the full employment level the models started at. With the help of the Phillips curve describe what happens to prices and unemployment. What kind of policy would the FED have to undertake to move the economy back to the full employment level of output. Describe what this monetary policy would do to output, prices and interest rates, and to employment and prices on the Phillips Curve.arrow_forward
- true or false Suppose that the central bank lost credibility in the sense that people no longer believe its inflation target (that is, inflation expectations are not `anchored’). In this case, both short-run output and long-run output do not increase in response to a permanently higher inflation target.arrow_forwardAccording to rational expectations economists, as a result of an increase in aggregate demand due to an expansionary monetary policy, real output and employment would not increase because said policy would be offset by higher prices and Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forwardWhen the economy is hit by a real shock, some economists think that the best response is for the Fed to do nothing. They fear that there is no good response to a real shock. Why is that? Explain.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781285165912Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781285165912
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning