Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
12th Edition
ISBN: 9780134078779
Author: Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher: PEARSON
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 35, Problem 1.1P
To determine

Role of economic growth in an extreme poverty.

Expert Solution & Answer
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

There are many people suffering a lot in the situation of extreme poverty. Growth by itself is not enough to improve their life conditions, because, economic growth mainly focus on the allocation of resources for the growth in real GDP. However, a country that faces extreme poverty has to concern a number of areas such as hunger, illiteracy, child mortality, diseases, gender inequality, maternal mortality, environmental protection and so on. Therefore, the allocation of resources is not always enough to manage all the problems of extreme poverty.

When more resources are allocated to economic growth, poverty rates will decline at a particular level. However, after that point, further allocation of resources for the reduction in poverty would become more difficult and has only smaller impact on poverty reduction due to the presence of several problems of extreme poverty. The concept of increasing opportunity cost states that, if resources are already allocated for an activity, smaller will be the pay-off for allocating extra resources to that activity. Therefore, most people likely agree with the given assessment.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Extreme poverty: Extreme poverty is a situation where people lack basic human needs such as food, clothes, shelter, safe drinking water, sanitation facilities, health, education, and information.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
answer
Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.
Not use ai please
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506756
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506725
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Economics:
Economics
ISBN:9781285859460
Author:BOYES, William
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
MACROECONOMICS FOR TODAY
Economics
ISBN:9781337613057
Author:Tucker
Publisher:CENGAGE L
Text book image
Micro Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:9781337613064
Author:Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher:Cengage,
Text book image
Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:9781337613040
Author:Tucker
Publisher:Cengage Learning