EBK PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS
8th Edition
ISBN: 8220103600453
Author: Mankiw
Publisher: CENGAGE L
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 34, Problem 7PA
Subpart (a):
To determine
Marginal propensity to consume.
Subpart (b):
To determine
Marginal propensity to consume.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Suppose economists observe that an increase in government spending of $14 billion raises the total demand for goods and services by $42 billion.
If these economists ignore the possibility of crowding out, they would estimate the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) to be .
Now suppose the economists allow for crowding out.
Their new estimate of the MPC would be than their initial one.
3. a) Suppose economists observe that an increase in government spending of 300 crore taka raises the total demand for goods and services to 400 crore taka. If these economists ignore the possibility of crowding out effect, calculate the marginal propensity to consume (MPC)?
b) Now suppose economists allow for crowding out. Would their new estimate of the MPC be smaller or larger than your answer to part a, explain.
What is the eventual effect on real GDP if the government increases its purchases of goods and services by $75,000? Assume the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.75.
$
What is the eventual effect on real GDP if the government, instead of changing its spending, increases transfers by $75,000? Assume the MPC has not changed.
$
An increase in government transfers or taxes, as opposed to an increase in government purchases of goods and services, will result in
an identical eventual effect on real GDP.
no change to real GDP.
a larger eventual effect on real GDP.
a smaller eventual effect on real GDP.
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose there are both multiplier and crowding out effects but without any accelerator effects. An increase in government expenditures would a. always shift aggregate demand right by a smaller amount than the increase in government expenditures. b. always shift aggregate demand right by a larger amount than the increase in government expenditures. c. shift aggregate demand right by a larger, equal, or smaller amount than the increase in government expenditures. d. always shift aggregate demand right by the same amount as the increase in government expenditures.arrow_forward!!!!!!arrow_forwardno handwritten notes!arrow_forward
- Suppose actual real GDP is $13.56 trillion, potential real GDP is $12.34 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.74. If we ignore price effects, and if the government already decided to increase its spending by $1.90 trillion, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its lump sum taxes to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.)arrow_forwardQ)Imagine the government wants to conduct an expansionary fiscal policy and needs an expert to answer the following questions before making a decision. a) Calculate the value of the multiplier effect if the marginal propensity to consume is 0.8. b) Calculate the increase in GDP which will occur, if the government increases its government spending by $600 million and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.8.arrow_forwardAssuming the economy is in long run and the govt implemnents a tax cut of $420 Billion, there is no crowding out, and marginal propensity to consume is 0.9 what's the initial and total effect of the tax reduction on aggregate demand? Is there a formula to calculate this?arrow_forward
- Suppose economists observe that an increase in government spending of 700 crore taka that raises the total demand for goods and services by 900 crore taka. If economists ignore the possibility of crowding out effect, calculate the marginal propensity to consume (MPC)? Answer Must be correct. Do all step and calculationarrow_forwardThe only fill in the blank options are Larger MPC or Smaller MPCarrow_forwardMacmillan Learning What is the eventual effect on real GDP if the government increases its purchases of goods and services by $60,000? Assume the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.75. What is the eventual effect on real GDP if the government, instead of changing its spending, increases transfers by $60,000? Assume the MPC has not changed. An increase in government transfers or taxes, as opposed to an increase in government purchases of goods and services, will result in O no change to real GDP. O a smaller eventual effect on real GDP. a larger eventual effect on real GDP. O an identical eventual effect on real GDP.arrow_forward
- A country is in the midst of a recession with a real GDP estimated to be $1.8 million below potential GDP. The governement's policy analyss believe the current value of the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.90. (Please answer all parts) a. If the government wants real GDP to equal potential GDP, by how much should it increase governement spending? Alternatively, by how much should it reduce taxes? b. Suppose that during the recession people have become less confident and decide they will spend only 50% of any additional income. In this case, if the governement increases spending by the amount calculated in part A, will real GDP end up less than , greater than or equal to potential GDP? by how much? c. With the same decrese in consumer spending as described in part B, if the governement decreases taxes by the amount calculated in part A, will real GDP end up less than, greater than or equal topotential GDP? by how much? d. Why is it difficult for the governement to predict…arrow_forwardSuppose the following list of events describes all of the economic activity resulting from an increase in government spending. Suppose that at each step after the initial one, the marginal propensity to consume is 0.62 and the tax rate is 8%. Step 0. The government spends $8500 on meat to host a very large dinner for foreign diplomats. Step A. The butcher takes the income earned by selling the meat, saves some, and spends the rest on a wedding cake for his daughter. Step B. The baker who produced the wedding cake saves some of her earnings and uses the rest to purchase beautiful candlesticks as gifts for all of her friends. Step C. The local candlestick maker saves some of his revenue for retirement and spends the rest on building materials to improve his house. Instructions: Modify the settings in the interactive tool to represent this event. Then click "Spending Rounds" and use the table to answer the following questions. Round answers to the nearest cent, if necessary. How much does…arrow_forwardSuppose actual real GDP is $13.74 trillion, potential real GDP is $12.69 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.6. If we ignore price effects, and if the government already decided to increase its spending by $1.61 trillion, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its lump sum taxes to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.) Correct Answer: 3.38 Please solve to get that same answerarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...EconomicsISBN:9781337091985Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337091992
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...
Economics
ISBN:9781337091985
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning