Sub part (a):
Consumption schedule and marginal propensity to consume.
Sub part (a):
Explanation of Solution
Table -1 shows the consumption schedule:
Table -1
Consumption | |
100 | 120 |
200 | 200 |
300 | 280 |
400 | 360 |
500 | 440 |
600 | 520 |
700 | 600 |
Figure 1 illustrates the level of consumption at different level of gross domestic product (GDP).
In Figure 1, the horizontal axis measures the gross domestic output and the vertical axis measures the consumption level.
Size of marginal propensity to consume (MPC) can be calculated as follows.
The size of marginal propensity to consume is 0.8.
Concept introduction:
Consumption schedule: Consumption schedule refers to the quantity of consumption at different levels of income.
Marginal propensity to consume (MPS): Marginal propensity to consume refers to the sensitivity of change in the consumption level due to the changes occurred in the income level.
Sub part (b):
Disposable income, tax rate, consumption schedule, marginal propensity to consume and multiplier.
Sub part (b):
Explanation of Solution
Disposable income (DI) can be calculated by using the following formula.
Substitute the respective values in Equation (1) to calculate the disposable income at the level of GDP $100.
Disposable income at the level of GDP $100 is $90.
Tax rate can be calculated by using the following formula.
Substitute the respective values in Equation (2) to calculate the tax rate at the level of GDP $100.
Tax rate at the level of GDP is 10%.
New consumption level can be calculated by using the following formula.
Substitute the respective values in Equation (3) to calculate the disposable income at the level of GDP $100. Since, the tax payment is equal amount of decrease in consumption for all the levels of GDP. The decreasing consumption for increasing $10 is assumed to be $8.
New consumption is $112.
Table -2 shows the values of disposable income, new consumption level after tax and the tax rate that are obtained by using Equations (1), (2) and (3).
Table -2
Gross domestic product | Tax | DI | New consumption | Tax rate |
100 | 10 | 90 | 112 | 10% |
200 | 10 | 190 | 192 | 5% |
300 | 10 | 290 | 272 | 3.33% |
400 | 10 | 390 | 352 | 2.5% |
500 | 10 | 490 | 432 | 2% |
600 | 10 | 590 | 512 | 1.67% |
700 | 10 | 690 | 592 | 1.43% |
Size of marginal propensity to consume (MPC) can be calculated as follows.
The size of marginal propensity to consume is 0.8.
Multiplier: Multiplier refers to the ratio of change in the real GDP to the change in initial consumption, at a constant price rate. Multiplier is positively related to the marginal propensity to consumer and negatively related with the marginal propensity to save. Multiplier can be evaluated using the following formula:
Since the value of MPC remains the same for part (a) and part (b), there is no change in the value of multiplier. The value of multiplier is 5
Figure -2 illustrates the level of consumption at different level of gross domestic product (GDP) for lump sum tax (Regressive tax).
In Figure -2, the horizontal axis measures the gross domestic output and the vertical axis measures the consumption level.
Concept introduction:
Consumption schedule: Consumption schedule refers to the quantity of consumption at different levels of income.
Marginal propensity to consume (MPS): Marginal propensity to consume refers to the sensitivity of change in the consumption level due to the changes occurred in the income level.
Multiplier: Multiplier refers to the ratio of change in the real GDP to the change in initial consumption at constant price rate. Multiplier is positively related to the marginal propensity to consumer and negatively related with the marginal propensity to save.
Sub part (c):
Tax amount, consumption schedule, marginal propensity to consume and multiplier.
Sub part (c):
Explanation of Solution
Tax amount can be calculated by using the following formula.
Substitute the respective values in Equation (4) to calculate the tax amount at $100 GDP.
Tax amount is $10.
Table -3 shows the values of disposable income, new consumption level after tax and the tax rate that are obtained by using Equations (1), (2), (3) and (4). The change in tax amount is differing for different levels of GDP. The decreasing consumption for increasing each $10 is assumed to be $8 (Thus, if the tax payment is $30, then the consumption decreases by $24
Table -3
Gross domestic product | Tax | DI | New consumption | Tax rate |
100 | 10 | 90 | 112 | 10% |
200 | 20 | 180 | 184 | 10% |
300 | 30 | 270 | 256 | 10% |
400 | 40 | 360 | 328 | 10% |
500 | 50 | 450 | 400 | 10% |
600 | 60 | 540 | 472 | 10% |
700 | 70 | 630 | 544 | 10% |
Multiplier: Multiplier refers to the ratio of change in the real GDP to the change in initial consumption, at a constant price rate. Multiplier is positively related to the marginal propensity to consumer and negatively related with the marginal propensity to save. Multiplier can be evaluated using the following formula:
Since the value of MPC different for part (a) and part (c), the value of multiplier for both the part is different. The value of multiplier is 3.57
Figure -3 illustrates the level of consumption at different level of gross domestic product (GDP) for proportional tax.
In Figure -3, the horizontal axis measures the gross domestic output and the vertical axis measures the consumption level.
Concept introduction:
Consumption schedule: Consumption schedule refers to the quantity of consumption at different levels of income.
Marginal propensity to consume (MPS): Marginal propensity to consume refers to the sensitivity of change in the consumption level due to the changes occurred in the income level.
Multiplier: Multiplier refers to the ratio of change in the real GDP to the change in initial consumption at constant price rate. Multiplier is positively related to the marginal propensity to consumer and negatively related with the marginal propensity to save.
Sub part (d):
consumption schedule, marginal propensity to consume and multiplier.
Sub part (d):
Explanation of Solution
Marginal propensity to consume can be calculated by using the following formula.
Substitute the respective values in Equation (5) to calculate the MPC at $100 GDP.
The value of MPC is 0.72.
Table -4 shows the values of disposable income, new consumption level after tax and the tax rate that are obtained by using Equations (1), (2), (3), (4) and (5). The change in tax amount is differing for different levels of GDP. The decreasing consumption for increasing each $10 is assumed to be $8 (Thus, if the tax payment is $20, then the consumption decreases by $16
Table -3
Gross domestic product | Tax | DI | New consumption | Tax rate | MPC |
100 | 0 | 100 | 120 | 0% | |
200 | 10 | 190 | 192 | 5% | 0.8 |
300 | 30 | 270 | 256 | 10% | 0.64 |
400 | 60 | 340 | 312 | 15% | 0.56 |
500 | 100 | 400 | 360 | 20% | 0.48 |
600 | 150 | 450 | 400 | 25% | 0.4 |
700 | 210 | 490 | 432 | 30% | 0.32 |
Multiplier: Multiplier refers to the ratio of change in the real GDP to the change in initial consumption, at a constant price rate. Multiplier is positively related to the marginal propensity to consumer and negatively related with the marginal propensity to save.
Multiplier value is differing for each level of GDP. When the tax rate increases, it reduces the value of MPC. Since the value of MPC decreases, the value of multiplier will also decrease.
Figure 4 illustrates the level of consumption at different level of gross domestic product (GDP) for progressive tax.
In Figure 4, the horizontal axis measures the gross domestic output and the vertical axis measures the consumption level.
Concept introduction:
Consumption schedule: Consumption schedule refers to the quantity of consumption at different levels of income.
Marginal propensity to consume (MPS): Marginal propensity to consume refers to the sensitivity of change in the consumption level due to the changes occurred in the income level.
Multiplier: Multiplier refers to the ratio of change in the real GDP to the change in initial consumption at constant price rate. Multiplier is positively related to the marginal propensity to consumer and negatively related with the marginal propensity to save.
Sup part (e):
Marginal propensity to consume and multiplier.
Sup part (e):
Explanation of Solution
Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 reveals that the proportional and progressive tax system reduces the value of MPC, so that the value of multiplier also decreases. The regressive tax system (Lump sum tax) does not alter the MPC. Since there is no change in the MPC, the multiplier remains the same.
Concept introduction:
Marginal propensity to consume (MPS): Marginal propensity to consume refers to the sensitivity of change in the consumption level due to the changes occurred in the income level.
Progressive tax: Progressive tax refers to the higher income people paying higher tax amount than the lower income people.
Proportional tax: Proportional tax rate refers to the fixed tax rate regardless of income and the tax rate and is the same for all levels of income.
Regressive tax: Regressive tax refers to the higher income people paying lower percentage of tax amount and lower income people paying higher percentage of tax amount.
Multiplier: Multiplier refers to the ratio of change in the real GDP to the change in initial consumption at constant price rate. Multiplier is positively related to the marginal propensity to consumer and negatively related with the marginal propensity to save.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 31 Solutions
Economics: Principles, Problems, & Policies (McGraw-Hill Series in Economics) - Standalone book
- 3. Consider the market for paper. The process of producing paper creates pollution. Assume that the marginal damage function for pollution is given by: MDF = 3E where damages are measured in dollars and E is the level of emissions. Assume further that the function describing the marginal abatement cost of emissions is given by MAC 120-E where benefits are measured in dollars and E is the level of emissions. a. Graph the marginal damage function (MDF) and the marginal abatement cost function (MAC). b. What is the unregulated level of emissions Eu? What is the social welfare of this emissions level? c. Assume an existing emission quota limits emissions to E = 60. Show on the graph why this policy is inefficient. What is the deadweight loss caused by this policy?arrow_forwardshow written calculation for Barrow_forwardProblem 1: 1. If a stock is expected to pay an annual dividend of $20 forever, what is the approximate present value of the stock, given that the discount rate is 5%? 2. If a stock is expected to pay an annual dividend of $20 forever, what is the approximate present value of the stock, given that the discount rate is 8%? 3. If a stock is expected to pay an annual dividend of $20 this year, what is the approximate present value of the stock, given that the discount rate is 8% and dividends are expected to grow at a rate of 2% per year?arrow_forward
- d-farrow_forwardG please!arrow_forward4. Consider two polluting firms, with the marginal abatement costs of polluters 1 and 2, respectively, equal to MAC₁ = 20-E1 MAC2 = 12-E2 a. What is the unregulated level of pollution for each firm? b. Assume policymakers have decided to cut the level of pollution in half. The way they intend to accomplish this goal is to require both firms to cut their pollution in half. What are the total costs of abatement from the policy? And how are these costs distributed between the firms? c. Is this uniform quota on emissions across firms the most cost-effective manner in which to reduce emissions by 50%?arrow_forward
- Don't used hand raiting and don't used Ai solutionarrow_forwardThanks in advance!arrow_forwardI need help figuring this out. I'm pretty sure this is correct?If Zambia is open to international trade in oranges without any restrictions, it will import 180 tons of oranges.I can't figure these two out: 1) Suppose the Zambian government wants to reduce imports to exactly 60 tons of oranges to help domestic producers. A tariff of ???? per ton will achieve this. 2) A tariff set at this level would raise ????in revenue for the Zambian government.arrow_forward
- 16:10 ← BEC 3701 - Assignments-... KWAME NKRUMAH UNIVERSITY TEACHING FOR EXCELLENCE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE ADVANCED MICRO-ECONOMICS (BEC 3701) Assignments INSTRUCTIONS: Check instructions below: LTE 1) Let u(q1,q2) = ln q₁ + q2 be the (direct) utility function, where q₁ and q2the two goods. Denote P₁ and P2 as the prices of those two goods and let M be per period money income. Derive each of the following: a) the ordinary or Marshallian demand functions q₁ = d₂ (P₁, P₂, M) for i = 1,2 [3 Marks] b) the compensated or Hicksian demand functions q₁ = h₂ (P₁, P2, M) for i = 1,2 [3 Marks] c) the Indirect Utility Function uº = v(P₁, P2, M) [3 Marks] d) the Expenditure Function E(P1, P2, U°) [3 Marks] e) Draw a diagram of the solution. There should be two graphs, one above the other; the first containing the indifference curves and budget constraint that characterize the solution to the consumer's choice problem; the second characterizing the demand…arrow_forwardHow would you answer the question in the News Wire “Future Living Standards”? Why?arrow_forwardal Problems (v) T (ix) F 1. Out of total number of 2807 women, who were interviewed for employment in a textile factory, 912 were from textile areas and the rest from non-textile areas. Amongst the married women, who belonged to textile areas, 347 were having some work experience and 173 did not have work experience, while for non-textile areas the corresponding figures were 199 and 670 respectively. The total number of women having no experience was 1841 of whom 311 resided in textile areas. Of the total number of women, 1418 were unmarried and of these the number of women having experience in the textile and non-textile areas was 254 and 166 respectively. Tabulate the above information. [CA. (Foundation), May 2000 Exactly (14) of the total employees of a sugar mill were these were married and one-halfarrow_forward
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStaxPrinciples of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781285165912Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningBrief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...EconomicsISBN:9781337091985Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781285165875Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning