Explain the witnessing a bubble.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 31, Problem 1DQ

To determine

Explain the witnessing a bubble.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Here, it is typical argument about whether or not there is a bubble, if price rises then there was not a bubble. From the year 2000 to year 2005, housing prices increases by 50 percent across the U.S. This moderately considerable increase also suggests that a bubble existed. Though, the markets like NY, MIA, and SD, housing prices increases by 77%, 96%, and 118%, respectively. It is very unlikely that these drastic price increases could have been powered by changes in fundamentals. Thus, to conclude that assumption on future price increases which means to conclude that a bubble existed at that point in time.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

how utillity relate to microeconomics ?

how opportunity coast relate to Economics ?

which article about commond Economic and hor it relate to Principle of Economics?

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 31, Problem 1DQ

To determine

Explain the witnessing a bubble.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Here, it is typical argument about whether or not there is a bubble, if price rises then there was not a bubble. From the year 2000 to year 2005, housing prices increases by 50 percent across the U.S. This moderately considerable increase also suggests that a bubble existed. Though, the markets like NY, MIA, and SD, housing prices increases by 77%, 96%, and 118%, respectively. It is very unlikely that these drastic price increases could have been powered by changes in fundamentals. Thus, to conclude that assumption on future price increases which means to conclude that a bubble existed at that point in time.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 31, Problem 1DQ

To determine

Explain the witnessing a bubble.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Here, it is typical argument about whether or not there is a bubble, if price rises then there was not a bubble. From the year 2000 to year 2005, housing prices increases by 50 percent across the U.S. This moderately considerable increase also suggests that a bubble existed. Though, the markets like NY, MIA, and SD, housing prices increases by 77%, 96%, and 118%, respectively. It is very unlikely that these drastic price increases could have been powered by changes in fundamentals. Thus, to conclude that assumption on future price increases which means to conclude that a bubble existed at that point in time.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 31, Problem 1DQ

To determine

Explain the witnessing a bubble.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Here, it is typical argument about whether or not there is a bubble, if price rises then there was not a bubble. From the year 2000 to year 2005, housing prices increases by 50 percent across the U.S. This moderately considerable increase also suggests that a bubble existed. Though, the markets like NY, MIA, and SD, housing prices increases by 77%, 96%, and 118%, respectively. It is very unlikely that these drastic price increases could have been powered by changes in fundamentals. Thus, to conclude that assumption on future price increases which means to conclude that a bubble existed at that point in time.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 31, Problem 1DQ

To determine

Explain the witnessing a bubble.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Here, it is typical argument about whether or not there is a bubble, if price rises then there was not a bubble. From the year 2000 to year 2005, housing prices increases by 50 percent across the U.S. This moderately considerable increase also suggests that a bubble existed. Though, the markets like NY, MIA, and SD, housing prices increases by 77%, 96%, and 118%, respectively. It is very unlikely that these drastic price increases could have been powered by changes in fundamentals. Thus, to conclude that assumption on future price increases which means to conclude that a bubble existed at that point in time.

Answer 6

Chapter 31, Problem 1DQ

To determine

Explain the witnessing a bubble.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Here, it is typical argument about whether or not there is a bubble, if price rises then there was not a bubble. From the year 2000 to year 2005, housing prices increases by 50 percent across the U.S. This moderately considerable increase also suggests that a bubble existed. Though, the markets like NY, MIA, and SD, housing prices increases by 77%, 96%, and 118%, respectively. It is very unlikely that these drastic price increases could have been powered by changes in fundamentals. Thus, to conclude that assumption on future price increases which means to conclude that a bubble existed at that point in time.

Answer 7

Chapter 31, Problem 1DQ

To determine

Explain the witnessing a bubble.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Here, it is typical argument about whether or not there is a bubble, if price rises then there was not a bubble. From the year 2000 to year 2005, housing prices increases by 50 percent across the U.S. This moderately considerable increase also suggests that a bubble existed. Though, the markets like NY, MIA, and SD, housing prices increases by 77%, 96%, and 118%, respectively. It is very unlikely that these drastic price increases could have been powered by changes in fundamentals. Thus, to conclude that assumption on future price increases which means to conclude that a bubble existed at that point in time.