Subpart (a):
The production possibility frontier .
Subpart (a):
Explanation of Solution
Figure -1 illustrates production possibility frontier.
Figure 1 shows the production possibilities frontiers for the two countries; U.S. and China. In Figure 1, the horizontal axis measures the quantity of shirts produced by both the countries and the vertical axis measures the quantity of computers produced. If either worker of the two countries, that is an American or a Chinese worker devotes all his labor hours in producing shirts, each worker can produce 100 shirts in a year. Then, it is the vertical intercept of the PPF for both the American and the Chinese worker. If they devote all of their time to the production of computers, then the U.S. worker can produce 20 computers in a year, while the Chinese worker can produce only 10 computers per year. These are the horizontal intercepts of the PPF for the U.S. and the Chinese worker, respectively. Since the
Concept introduction:
Production possibility frontier (PPF): PPF is a curve depicting all maximum output possibilities for two goods, given a set of inputs consisting of resources and other factors.
Subpart (b):
Opportunity cost and price of the good.
Subpart (b):
Explanation of Solution
To determine the export pattern of shirts, the
Opportunity cost of shirts in the U.S. is calculated as,
Thus, the price of 1 shirt in the U.S. is 0.2 computers.
Opportunity cost of shirts in China is calculated as,
Thus, the price of 1 shirt in China is 0.1 computers.
Since China has a lower opportunity cost of shirts, China has a comparative advantage in its production. So, China will produce and export shirts to the U.S. in exchange for computers from the U.S. since the latter has a comparative advantage in the production of computers (5 shirts
The range of prices of shirts at which trade can occur is between 0.1 and 0.2 computers, per computer.
An example would be a price of 0.15 computers. Suppose China produced only shirts (100 shirts) and exported 50 shirts in exchange for 7.5
The United States is also benefited from this trade. Suppose American workers produced only computers (20 computers) and traded 7.5 of computers to China for 50 shirts. The U.S. would have 12.5 (20-7.5) computers and 50 shirts. Thus, the U.S. would be better off than before trade (10 computers and 50 shirts).
Concept introduction:
Production possibility frontier (PPF): PPF is a curve depicting all maximum output possibilities for two goods, given a set of inputs consisting of resources and other factors.
Opportunity cost: Opportunity cost is the cost of foregone alternative, that is, loss of an alternative when another alternative is chosen.
Comparative advantage: It refers to the ability to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than another producer.
Subpart (c):
Opportunity cost and price of the good.
Subpart (c):
Explanation of Solution
For the calculation of price, the calculation of opportunity cost is required.
Opportunity cost of a computer in the U.S. is calculated as,
Thus, the price of 1 computer in the U.S. is 5 shirts.
Opportunity cost of a computer in China is calculated as,
Thus, the price of 1 computer in China is 10 shirts.
The range of prices of computers at which trade can occur is between 5 and 10 shirts per computer. This is because, at a price lower than 5 shirts, the U.S. will choose to produce its own shirts and will be unwilling to export computers, as the opportunity cost of a shirt for the U.S. is 0.2
Concept introduction:
Production possibility frontier (PPF): PPF is a curve depicting all maximum output possibilities for two goods, given a set of inputs consisting of resources and other factors.
Opportunity cost: Opportunity cost is the cost of foregone alternative, that is, loss of an alternative when another alternative is chosen.
Comparative advantage: It refers to the ability to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than another producer.
Subpart (d):
Gains from the trade.
Subpart (d):
Explanation of Solution
Concept introduction:
Specialization: Specialization refers to allocate the work according to their efficiency. If an individual, company or country has produced a good at lower opportunity cost, then that particular individual, company or country should produce those goods.
Trade: The trade refers to the exchange of capital, goods, and services across different countries.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 3 Solutions
Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Course List)
- While visiting and chatting with an old friend who lives in a rural area, a man's teenage daughter joins the conversation and shared that she wants to work on a farm after she graduates from college and that farming is her passion. She shared the graph that follows from the Bureau of Labor Statistics that she recently obtained that shows the average wage (salary) by profession. She was very confused about why different professions pay people different wages. She was expecting the pay rate for people who work in the farming industry to be paid more than other “unnecessary” professions. While sharing the data with you, she asked the following questions: Why do workers in business and financial operations get paid more than those who work in farming and health care? After all, farmers make food and health care workers help people’s health. I don’t get it, but who decides how much people in certain professions get paid? I mean who decides how much I should be compensated for my work? Why…arrow_forwardcaib 2 questions pleasearrow_forwardhow can a sugery drink like pepsi have a tax rise and not loose its customers ?arrow_forward
- Is competition good for business? Is it good for consumers? Explain why or why not for botharrow_forwardInstructions:- Need to do in assembly language. Submit your DOC file with all explanation, also submit your code file. no chatgpt pls no plagirism plsarrow_forward'producing more goods and services lowers environmental quality' is not the correct answer.arrow_forward
- A movement along an economy's production possibility frontier with output on one axis and environmental quality on the other shows that: technological improvements may lead to a sustainable economy with higher consumption in the future and better an improved environment. producing more goods and services lowers environmental quality. producing more goods and services raises environmental quality. a high use of natural resources to produce more goods and services today may lead to an unsustainable economy with lower consumption in the future.arrow_forwardDon't used Ai solutionarrow_forward= - 12. Recall the market setting in Question 3, where the demand curve is P = 10 – 2Q, and mar- ginal cost is c 2. Now suppose that two firms, numbered 1 and 2 compete over this de- mand curve. They produce quantities Q₁ and Q2, hence total output is given by Q = Q1+Q2. The best response function of firm 1 to firm 2, labeled Q₁ = B₁ (Q2) is given by (a) 2-2Q2 - 4 (b) 2-Q2 (c) 2 – 02 Q2 Q2 (d) 2- (e) 2-Q 4 13. In the previous question, the Cournot-Nash equilibrium quantity produced by each firm is (a) 1 (d) 2 (b) 3 2 (e) 52 (c) 43 3arrow_forward
- 2. Sweet taxes make the world sweeter! According to a study conducted by the World Health Organization, noncommunicable diseases, such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic lung disease, and stroke, are the main leading causes of deaths—almost 90% worldwide. These diseases also have social and economic costs. Cardiovascular diseases, for example, cost the economy of the European Union about 210 billion Euro in 2015. One method some European countries adopted to try to reduce the death rate from those leading causes was to impose high taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages. Assume that your next president loves the idea of sugar taxes and proposes a 30% tax on all sugary beverages in the country. And assume you are a marketing manager at a company that makes sugary soft drinks. The owner of the company heard the news and came to you for advice and asked you the following questions: So, buddy, should I be worried about our business if this sugar tax policy is implemented? Why? How do…arrow_forward3. The world is more beautiful with just a bit of makeup. Your friend Nora is an artist, and she loves makeup, so she decided to become a beautician. She recently began recording videos of herself applying makeup to others and posting those videos on social media. She typically charges about $250 for full facial makeup for special occasions like weddings, engagement parties, graduation parties, and so forth. Her work is great, and her videos made her famous on social media outlets, and now she has over 500,000 followers. The demand for her services has risen. People have to book her months in advance if they want her to do their makeup. She was excited about her success, and she wants to take advantage of it, so she wants to learn more about her opportunities and has texted you the following questions: Now people want my services so badly, do you think I should raise my prices from $250 to $500 to make more revenue (sales)? Or should I reduce my price to $150? Please educate me on…arrow_forwardDon't used Ai solution and hand raitingarrow_forward
- Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, IncEconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student EditionEconomicsISBN:9780078747663Author:McGraw-HillPublisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub CoPrinciples of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStax