Microeconomics (9th Edition) (Pearson Series in Economics)
9th Edition
ISBN: 9780134184241
Author: Robert Pindyck, Daniel Rubinfeld
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 3, Problem 6E
(a)
To determine
The graph of the indifference curve.
(b)
To determine
Explain the reason for difference in both IC.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
A consumer has a budget set aside for entertainment during the year, and they spend the budget on concerts and plays. The consumer has a strong preference for attending concerts over plays: the two activities are substitutes, but not very strong substitutes. Sketch the indifference curves for this consumer on a graph, with concert tickets on the vertical axis and play tickets on the horizontal axis. Briefly explain why the consumer might ultimately choose to purchase a large number of play tickets, even though they have a strong preference for concerts. Include a budget line on your graph to illustrate this case.
Suppose you have an income of $24 and the only two goods
you consume are apples (x1) and peaches (x2). The price of apples is $4 and the price of peaches is $3. Suppose that your optimal consumption is 4 peaches and 3
apples.
a. Illustrate this in a graph using indifference curves
and budget lines.
b. Now suppose that the price of apples falls to $2 and
I take enough money away from you to make you as happy
as you were originally. Will you buy more or fewer
peaches? Provide a graphical representation.
Carol has very weird preferences. She only cares about quantity. When evaluating a bundle, Carol only looks at the highest amount of a good she can consume in each bundle, regardless of whether it is of eggs or dumplings. She is indifferent between two bundles only when the largest consumption of a good within each bundle is the same across bundles. So, for instance, if a bundle offers 5 eggs and 1 dumpling she finds that bundle indifferent to a bundle offering 4 eggs and 5 dumplings. These preferences are transitive. But are they monotone? And convex?
Chapter 3 Solutions
Microeconomics (9th Edition) (Pearson Series in Economics)
Ch. 3 - Prob. 1RQCh. 3 - Prob. 2RQCh. 3 - Prob. 3RQCh. 3 - Prob. 4RQCh. 3 - Prob. 5RQCh. 3 - Prob. 6RQCh. 3 - Prob. 7RQCh. 3 - Prob. 8RQCh. 3 - Prob. 9RQCh. 3 - Prob. 10RQ
Ch. 3 - Prob. 11RQCh. 3 - Prob. 12RQCh. 3 - Prob. 13RQCh. 3 - Prob. 1ECh. 3 - Prob. 2ECh. 3 - Prob. 3ECh. 3 - Prob. 4ECh. 3 - Prob. 5ECh. 3 - Prob. 6ECh. 3 - Prob. 7ECh. 3 - Prob. 8ECh. 3 - Prob. 9ECh. 3 - Prob. 10ECh. 3 - Prob. 11ECh. 3 - Prob. 12ECh. 3 - Prob. 13ECh. 3 - Prob. 14ECh. 3 - Prob. 15ECh. 3 - Prob. 16ECh. 3 - Prob. 17E
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Kevin likes going to the ballpark to watch baseball, and he also is fond of going to the theater to listen to the symphony orchestra. The following diagram shows two of Kevin's indifference curves for going to ballgames and symphonies. With Kevin's initial budget constraint (BC1), he chose to go to five symphonies and five baseball games per month (point X). Then his budget constraint shifted to BC2, and he chose to go to four symphonies and four ballgames per month (point Y). BALL GAMES 8 10 I I I I 4 5 SYMPHONIES BC BC B 10 Of the following choices, which could have shifted Kevin's budget constraint from BC₁ to BC2? Check all that apply. The price of symphony tickets increased while his income and the price of baseball tickets stayed the same. His income increased while the prices of baseball and symphony tickets stayed the same. The prices of both baseball and symphony tickets increased while his income stayed the same. His income decreased while the prices of baseball and symphony…arrow_forwardSuppose Natasha consumes two goods: good 1 and good 2. Last year, the price of good 1 was $2.00 and the price of good 2 was $5.00. Given these prices, Natasha maximized satisfaction consuming bundle A, as indicated in the figure to the right. However, this year, the price of good 1 has increased to $6.00 and the price of good 2 has changed to $3.75. Given these prices, Natasha would be equally well off at consumption bundle B. Calculate a Laspeyres cost-of-living index for Natasha, using 100 as the base for last year. In particular, the Laspeyres index for this year is. (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.) The Laspeyres index suggests inflation has been percent over the year. (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.) The Laspeyres cost-of-living index overstates the rate of inflation because it assumes that consumers do not alter their consumption patterns as prices change. Natasha's true cost-of-living increase has been percent. (Enter your response rounded…arrow_forwardAnother instance when people are likely not to spend a dime (or a minute) on an item is when they have a dislike for mixing the item with other items available. In this case, we say the consumer has ‘non-convex preferences’ and indifference curves are bowed out from the origin. In plain language, the consumer has a preference for binging. We often feel this way towards our favorite social media app. Consider a kid who has four hours a day to spend on social media. They enjoy spending time on Snapchat (x) or spending time on Twitter (y). a) Write the kid’s time constraint and illustrate it in a graph where you measure time spent on Snapchat along the horizontal axis and time spent on Twitter along the vertical axis. This kid’s utility from time spent on Snapchat and time spent on Twitter is U(x,y) = 4x2+ y2. b) In your graph, draw a couple of the kid’s indifference curves. Notice how the kid’s |MRSY,X| increases along each curve as he spends more time on Snapchat and less time on…arrow_forward
- Suppose Natasha consumes two goods: good 1 and good 2. Last year, the price of good 1 was $2.00 and the price of good 2 was $5.00. Given these prices, Natasha maximized satisfaction consuming bundle A, as indicated in the figure to the right. However, this year, the price of good 1 has increased to $6.00 and the price of good 2 has changed to $9.60. Given these prices, Natasha would be equally well off at consumption bundle B. 100- 90- 80- Calculate a Laspeyres cost-of-living index for Natasha using 100 as the base for last year. In particular, the Laspeyres index for this year is (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.) 70- 60- 50- 40- 30- 20- 10- L1 0- 10 20 30 70 80 50 60 Good 1 40 90 100 Good 2arrow_forwardSuppose Naomi consumes two goods: good 1 and good 2. Last year, the price of good 1 was $2.00 and the price of good 2 was $3.20. Given these prices, Naomi maximized satisfaction consuming bundle A, as indicated in the figure to the right. However, this year, the price of good 1 has increased to $6.00 and the price of good 2 has changed to $2.40. Given these prices, Naomi would be equally well off at consumption bundle B. Calculate a Laspeyres cost-of-living index for Naomi using 100 as the base for last year. In particular, the Laspeyres index for this year is. (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.) The Laspeyres index suggests inflation has been percent over the year. (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.) The Laspeyres cost-of-living index overstates the rate of inflation because it assumes that consumers do not alter their consumption patterns as prices change. Naomi's true cost-of-living increase has been percent. (Enter your response rounded to two…arrow_forwardConsider a hypothetical consumer named Hayden who is shopping for bread and brie. The graph with bread and brie on the axes presents the utility‑maximizing combinations of bread and brie that Hayden chooses when the price of bread is $1.00$1.00 per loaf and the price of brie is $4.00$4.00 and $6.00$6.00 per wheel, respectively. The other graph shows Hayden's demand curve for brie. The two points and associated values in the graph for bread and brie combinations correspond to points A and B in the graph of the demand curve for brie. What are the specific prices and quantities of brie associated with points A and B on Hayden's demand curve? price of brie at point A: $$ quantity demanded at point A: price of brie at point B: $$ quantity demanded at point B:arrow_forward
- Chuck and Diane are both currently consuming 15 apples and 3 bananas each week, which we can call bundle A. Assume that bananas are the horizontal axis good for both consumers. Let's say both Chuck and Diane consume one more banana each week (4 bananas in total), moving to their respective bundle B on their own indifference curves. In order for Chuck and Diane to remain on the same indifference curve: • Chuck must give up 3 apples, to account for the marginal utility gained from a fourth banana ● Diane must give up 5 apples, to account for the marginal utility gained from a fourth banana Based on the information above, what can we tell about Chuck and Diane's preferences? Diane's indifference curves are flatter than Chuck's indifference curves Chuck and Diane have the same MRS between the bundles with 3 and 4 bananas MRS at The absolute value of the slope of Diane's indifference curves is greater for Diane than Chuck All of the above statements are truearrow_forwardLorenzo enjoys going to the theater to see plays, and he also enjoys going to rock concerts. The following diagram shows two of Lorenzo's indifference curves for going to plays and concerts. With Lorenzo's initial budget constraint (BC1), he chose to go to five concerts and three plays per month (point X). Then his budget constraint shifted to BC2, and he chose to go to four concerts and six plays per month (point Y). PLAYS 10 0 4 5 CONCERTS BC 8 Show Transcribed Text BC 10 C Of the following choices, which could have shifted Lorenzo's budget constraint from BC₁ to BC₂? Check all that apply. The price of theater tickets increased while his income and the price of concert tickets stayed the same. His income decreased while the prices of theater and concert tickets stayed the same. His income increased while the prices of theater and concert tickets stayed the same. The prices of both theater and concert tickets decreased while his income stayed the same. Based on Lorenzo's consumption…arrow_forwardSuppose there are two individuals, Jane and Keith. Jane's utility function is Uj = XY, while Keith’s is Uk = X^2 Y^2 . Where X and Y are two separate goods. a) Find the marginal utilities of the two goods for Jane and Keith. b) Sketch the marginal utilities for Jane and Keith. c) What do the marginal utilities tell us about their tastes? d) Show by implicit differentiation that, for any given combination of X and Y, Jane's indifference curve has the same slope as Keith's.arrow_forward
- James and John both consume only poutine and pizza. Both of them always choose to have some poutine and some pizza, and both have strictly convex preferences. However, James likes to have a great deal of poutine with a small slice of pizza, and John likes lots of pizza slices with a small amount of poutine. Both face the same prices for both goods and have chosen bundles to maximize their utilities subject to their budgets. Question 7 options: James's marginal rate of substitution is larger in absolute value than John's. John's marginal rate of substitution is larger in absolute value than James's. Their marginal rates of substitution are the same. Who has the larger marginal rate of substitution depends on income levels. There is not enough information for us to be able to tell who has the larger marginal rate of substitution.arrow_forwardImran consumes two goods, X1 and X2. his utility function takes the form: u(X1, X2)= 4(X1)^3+3(X2)^5. The price of X1 is Rs. 2 and the price of X2 is Rs. 4. Imran has allocated Rs. 1000 for the consumption of these two goods. (a) Fine the optimal bundle of these two goods that Imran would consume if he wants to maximize his utility. Note: write bundles in integers instead of decimals. (b) What is Imran's expenditure on X1? On X2? (c) Do you find more than one bundle satisfying the first order conditions? Why?arrow_forwardSmith and Jones are stranded on a desert island. Each has in her possession some slices of ham (H) and cheese (C). Smith prefers to consume ham and cheese in the fixed proportion of 2 slices of cheese to each slice of ham. Her utility function is given by Us = min(10H, 5C). Jones, on the other hand, regards ham and cheese as substitutes – she is always willing to trade 3 slices of ham for 4 slices of cheese, and her utility function is given by UJ = 4H + 3C. Total endowments are 100 slices of ham and 200 slices of cheese. a. Draw the Edgeworth Box diagram for all possible exchanges in this situation. What is the contract curve for this exchange economy? b. Suppose Smith’s initial endowment is 40 slices of ham and 80 slices of cheese (Jones has the remaining ham and cheese as her initial endowment). What mutually beneficial trades are possible in this economy and what utility levels will Smith and Jones enjoy from such trades? c. Now imagine a new endowment in which Smith has 60 slices…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning