
(a)
To obtain: The proportion of females aged 20-29 weighted under 100 pounds.
To find: The percent of the
(a)

Answer to Problem 3.51E
The proportion of females aged 20-29 weighted under 100 pounds is 0.0255.
The percent of the
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
The NHANES survey of 2009-2010 includes the weights of 548 females in the United States aged 20-29. The weights of females follow
Calculation:
For proportion of females aged 20-29 weighted under 100 pounds:
The formula to find the proportion of females aged 20-29 weighted under 100 pounds is,
Substitute 14 for ‘number of females aged 20-29 weighted under 100 pounds’ and 548 for ‘Total number of females’.
Thus, the proportion of females aged 20-29 weighted under 100 pounds is 0.0255.
For percent of the
Define the random variable x as weights of the females.
The formula for the standardized score is,
The females aged 20-29 weighted below 100 pounds is denoted as
Subtract the mean and then divide by the standard deviation to transform the value of x into standard normal z.
Where, standardized score
The percent of the
Use Table A: Standard normal cumulative proportions to find the area.
Procedure:
- Locate –1.2 in the left column of the A-2 Table.
- Obtain the value in the corresponding row below 0.06.
That is,
Thus, the percent of the
(b)
To obtain: The proportion of females aged 20-29 weighted over 250 pounds.
To find: The percent of the
(b)

Answer to Problem 3.51E
The proportion of females aged 20-29 weighted over 250 pounds is 0.0602.
The percent of the
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
The NHANES survey of 2009-2010 includes the weights of 548 females in the United States aged 20-29. From the data the number of females aged 20-29 weighted over 250 pounds is 33. The weights of females follow normal distribution with mean 161.58 pounds and standard deviation 48.96 pounds.
Calculation:
For proportion of females aged 20-29 weighted over 250 pounds:
The formula to find the females aged 20-29 weighted over 250 pounds is,
Substitute 33 for ‘number of females aged 20-29 weighted over 250 pounds’ and 548 for ‘Total number of females’.
Thus, the proportion of females aged 20-29 weighted over 250 pounds is 0.0602.
For percent of the
The females aged 20-29 weighted above 250 pounds is denoted as
Subtract the mean and then divide by the standard deviation to transform the value of x into standard normal z.
Where, standardized score
The percent of the
Use Table A: Standard normal cumulative proportions to find the area to the left of 1.81.
Procedure:
- Locate 1.8 in the left column of the A-2 Table.
- Obtain the value in the corresponding row below 0.01.
That is,
The area to the right of 1.81 is,
Thus, the percent of the
(c)
To check: Whether it is a good idea to summarize the distribution of weights by an
(c)

Answer to Problem 3.51E
The idea is not good to summarize the distribution of weights by a
Explanation of Solution
Justification:
The percentage of females aged 20-29 weighted under 100 pounds is 2.55% and the percentage of females aged 20-29 weighted over 250 pounds is 6.02%.
Using normal distribution, the percentage of
Thus, the results suggest that normal distribution not provides a good approximation to the distribution of weights.
Hence, the idea is not good to summarize the distribution of weights by a
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 3 Solutions
EBK THE BASIC PRACTICE OF STATISTICS
- What is one sample T-test? Give an example of business application of this test? What is Two-Sample T-Test. Give an example of business application of this test? .What is paired T-test. Give an example of business application of this test? What is one way ANOVA test. Give an example of business application of this test? 1. One Sample T-Test: Determine whether the average satisfaction rating of customers for a product is significantly different from a hypothetical mean of 75. (Hints: The null can be about maintaining status-quo or no difference; If your alternative hypothesis is non-directional (e.g., μ≠75), you should use the two-tailed p-value from excel file to make a decision about rejecting or not rejecting null. If alternative is directional (e.g., μ < 75), you should use the lower-tailed p-value. For alternative hypothesis μ > 75, you should use the upper-tailed p-value.) H0 = H1= Conclusion: The p value from one sample t-test is _______. Since the two-tailed p-value…arrow_forwardUsing the accompanying Accounting Professionals data to answer the following questions. a. Find and interpret a 90% confidence interval for the mean years of service. b. Find and interpret a 90% confidence interval for the proportion of employees who have a graduate degree. view the Accounting Professionals data. Employee Years of Service Graduate Degree?1 26 Y2 8 N3 10 N4 6 N5 23 N6 5 N7 8 Y8 5 N9 26 N10 14 Y11 10 N12 8 Y13 7 Y14 27 N15 16 Y16 17 N17 21 N18 9 Y19 9 N20 9 N Question content area bottom Part 1 a. A 90% confidence interval for the mean years of service is (Use ascending order. Round to two decimal places as needed.)arrow_forwardIf, based on a sample size of 900,a political candidate finds that 509people would vote for him in a two-person race, what is the 95%confidence interval for his expected proportion of the vote? Would he be confident of winning based on this poll? Question content area bottom Part 1 A 9595% confidence interval for his expected proportion of the vote is (Use ascending order. Round to four decimal places as needed.)arrow_forward
- Questions An insurance company's cumulative incurred claims for the last 5 accident years are given in the following table: Development Year Accident Year 0 2018 1 2 3 4 245 267 274 289 292 2019 255 276 288 294 2020 265 283 292 2021 263 278 2022 271 It can be assumed that claims are fully run off after 4 years. The premiums received for each year are: Accident Year Premium 2018 306 2019 312 2020 318 2021 326 2022 330 You do not need to make any allowance for inflation. 1. (a) Calculate the reserve at the end of 2022 using the basic chain ladder method. (b) Calculate the reserve at the end of 2022 using the Bornhuetter-Ferguson method. 2. Comment on the differences in the reserves produced by the methods in Part 1.arrow_forwardA population that is uniformly distributed between a=0and b=10 is given in sample sizes 50( ), 100( ), 250( ), and 500( ). Find the sample mean and the sample standard deviations for the given data. Compare your results to the average of means for a sample of size 10, and use the empirical rules to analyze the sampling error. For each sample, also find the standard error of the mean using formula given below. Standard Error of the Mean =sigma/Root Complete the following table with the results from the sampling experiment. (Round to four decimal places as needed.) Sample Size Average of 8 Sample Means Standard Deviation of 8 Sample Means Standard Error 50 100 250 500arrow_forwardA survey of 250250 young professionals found that two dash thirdstwo-thirds of them use their cell phones primarily for e-mail. Can you conclude statistically that the population proportion who use cell phones primarily for e-mail is less than 0.720.72? Use a 95% confidence interval. Question content area bottom Part 1 The 95% confidence interval is left bracket nothing comma nothing right bracket0.60820.6082, 0.72510.7251. As 0.720.72 is within the limits of the confidence interval, we cannot conclude that the population proportion is less than 0.720.72. (Use ascending order. Round to four decimal places as needed.)arrow_forward
- I need help with this problem and an explanation of the solution for the image described below. (Statistics: Engineering Probabilities)arrow_forwardA survey of 250 young professionals found that two-thirds of them use their cell phones primarily for e-mail. Can you conclude statistically that the population proportion who use cell phones primarily for e-mail is less than 0.72? Use a 95% confidence interval. Question content area bottom Part 1 The 95% confidence interval is [ ], [ ] As 0.72 is ▼ above the upper limit within the limits below the lower limit of the confidence interval, we ▼ can cannot conclude that the population proportion is less than 0.72. (Use ascending order. Round to four decimal places as needed.)arrow_forwardI need help with this problem and an explanation of the solution for the image described below. (Statistics: Engineering Probabilities)arrow_forward
- I need help with this problem and an explanation of the solution for the image described below. (Statistics: Engineering Probabilities)arrow_forwardI need help with this problem and an explanation of the solution for the image described below. (Statistics: Engineering Probabilities)arrow_forwardQuestions An insurance company's cumulative incurred claims for the last 5 accident years are given in the following table: Development Year Accident Year 0 2018 1 2 3 4 245 267 274 289 292 2019 255 276 288 294 2020 265 283 292 2021 263 278 2022 271 It can be assumed that claims are fully run off after 4 years. The premiums received for each year are: Accident Year Premium 2018 306 2019 312 2020 318 2021 326 2022 330 You do not need to make any allowance for inflation. 1. (a) Calculate the reserve at the end of 2022 using the basic chain ladder method. (b) Calculate the reserve at the end of 2022 using the Bornhuetter-Ferguson method. 2. Comment on the differences in the reserves produced by the methods in Part 1.arrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman





