Concept explainers
a
Introduction:
Materiality: The theory of materiality is important to audit practice. It is planning and executing the
The overall materiality and tolerable misstatement using income before taxes for the year 2018.
a
Answer to Problem 3.32P
- Determination of Materiality.
- Determination of tolerable misstatement.
Income before taxes, $25,950,000 or 25.95 million
Income before taxes = $12,975,000 or 12.98 million
Explanation of Solution
Determination of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.
If the current year income before tax is not stable “normalized earnings” − last three years average income before tax can be usedto assess overall Materiality.
Average of Last three years =
- Determination of Materiality.
- Determination of tolerable misstatement.
When 5 percent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality, the materiality of M&J will be:
Income before taxes, $25,950,000 =
Or 25.95 million
The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 percent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, 50 percent of tolerable misstatement is assumed.
Income before taxes = $12,975,000 =
Or 12.97 million.
b
Introduction:
Materiality: The theory of materiality is important to audit practice. It is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk. Materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant. Once misstatements are identified, the auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.
The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement using either total assets or total revenues as the benchmark anduse .25% and 2% for calculation.
b
Answer to Problem 3.32P
| 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
| Overall Materiality at .25% | ||||
| Total Assets (million) | $58.55 | $40.34 | $33.1 | $29.9 |
| Total Revenue (million) | $50.7 | $33.22 | $23 | $22.46 |
| Tolerable misstatement: | ||||
| Total Assets (million) | 29.3 | 20.17 | 16.55 | 14.95 |
| Total Revenue (million) | 25.35 | 16.61 | 11.5 | 11.23 |
| Overall Materiality at 2% | ||||
| Total Assets (million) | $468.44 | $322.7 | $264.8 | $239.32 |
| Total Revenue (million) | $405.44 | $265.8 | $183.8 | $179.7 |
| Tolerable misstatement: | ||||
| Total Assets (million) | $234.22 | $161.35 | $132.4 | $119.66 |
| Total Revenue (million) | $202.72 | $132.89 | $92 | $89.85 |
Explanation of Solution
a. Determination of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.
- Determination of Materiality.
- Determination of tolerable misstatement.
When.25 percent of the benchmark is taken for overall materiality.
2018:
Total revenue, $50.7 million =
Total Assets, $58.55 million =
2017:
Total revenue, $33.22 million =
Total Assets, $40.34 million =
2016:
Total revenue, $23 million =
Total Assets, $33.1 million =
2015:
Total revenue, $22.46 million =
Total Assets, $29.9 million =
Assuming 2 percent of the benchmark is appropriate for overall materiality.
2018:
Total revenue, $405.44 million =
Total Assets, $468.44 million =
2017:
Total revenue, $265.8 million =
Total Assets, $322.7 million =
2016:
Total revenue, $183.8 million =
Total Assets, $264.8 million =
2015:
Total revenue, $179.7 million =
Total Assets, $239.32 million =
The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 percent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 percent of tolerable misstatement.
Tolerable misstatement for .25 percent overall materiality
2018:
Total revenue, $25.35 million =
Total Assets, $29.3 million =
2017:
Total revenue, $16.61million =
Total Assets, $20.17 million =
2016:
Total revenue, $11.5 million =
Total Assets, $16.55 million =
2015:
Total revenue, $11.23 million =
Total Assets, $14.95 million =
Tolerable misstatement for 2 percent overall materiality
2018:
Total revenue, $207.25 million =
Total Assets, $234.22 million =
2017:
Total revenue, $132.89 million =
Total Assets, $161.35 million =
2016:
Total revenue, $92 million =
Total Assets, $132.4 million =
2015:
Total revenue, $89.85 million =
Total Assets, $119.66 million =
c
Introduction:
Materiality: The theory of materiality is important to audit practice. It is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk. Materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant. Once misstatements are identified, the auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.
The overall materiality of misstatement of $50 million based on calculations in part a, and b.
c
Answer to Problem 3.32P
A misstatement is material in case of income before tax and immaterial when done using total assets and total revenue.
Explanation of Solution
a. Evaluation of misstatements of an overstatement of income of $50 million.
The misstatements and tolerable misstatement are compared with each other. If misstatement is greater than tolerable misstatement or if aggregate misstatements were greater than overall materiality, the business has to correct the financial statements or else auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.
When theincome before taxes is evaluated for overall materiality in case of KR,there is a misstatement of $50 million in 2018 which is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.
Income before taxes:
KR’s overall materiality is $25.95 million and tolerable misstatement is $12.98 million, even if the average of last three year is taken to determine materiality.
Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust misstatement in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.
Total Assets
KR overall materiality and tolerable misstatement are above misstatement of $50 million.
As misstatement is below than the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement, it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.
Total revenue
KR overall materiality and tolerable misstatement are above misstatement of $50 million.
As misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement, it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 3 Solutions
AUDITING LL W/ CONNECT <C>
- Sandhill Rental Company provided the following information to its auditors. For the year ended March 31, 2017, the company had revenues of $877,800, general and administrative expenses of $358,200, depreciation expenses of $131,455, leasing expenses of $108,195, and interest expenses equal to $78,122. If the company's average tax rate is 34 percent, what is its net income after taxes? (Round intermediate calculations and final answer to the nearest whole dollar, e.g. 5,275.)Excel Template(Note: This template includes the problem statement as it appears in your textbook. The problem assigned to you here may have different values. When using this template, copy the problem statement from this screen for easy reference to the values you’ve been given here, and be sure to update any values that may have been pre-entered in the template based on the textbook version of the problem.) Sandhill Rental CompanyIncome Statement as of March 31, 2017 Amount select an income statement…arrow_forwardSandhill Rental Company provided the following information to its auditors. For the year ended March 31, 2017, the company had revenues of $877,800, general and administrative expenses of $358,200, depreciation expenses of $131,455, leasing expenses of $108,195, and interest expenses equal to $78,122. If the company's average tax rate is 34 percent, what is its net income after taxes? (Round intermediate calculations and final answer to the nearest whole dollar, e.g. 5,275.) Sandhill Rental CompanyIncome Statement as of March 31, 2017Amount select an income statement item Depreciation ExpensesRent RevenueEarnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and AmortizationNet Income / (Loss)Leasing ExpensesRevenuesGeneral and Administrative ExpensesUtilities ExpenseEarnings Before Interest and TaxesInterest ExpenseEarnings Before TaxesTaxes $enter a dollar amount select an income statement item…arrow_forwardCompany A's balance sheet and income statement for the fiscal year ending 2021 show the following: - Net Income: $15,000,000 - Total Assets: $75,000,000 - Total Revenue: $200,000,000 - Net Revenue: $50,000,000 You are the associate auditor on this client. Your senior auditor tells you that for Company A, 1.5% is the materiality judgement. Based on the appropriate benchmark identified in Question #1, determine the planning materiality. Show your work. Your work should look like: BENCHMARK AMOUNT x MATERIALITY JUDGEMENT = PLANNING MATERIALITYarrow_forward
- Michael Corporation is on a calendar year basis. The following data were found during your audit: 1) An excerpt from the client’s trial balance revealed the following account balances:Accounts receivable P 80,000Inventory, per count 1,200,000Accounts payable 790,000Net sales 6,050,000Net purchases 3,300,000Net income 610,000 2) The client conducted an inventory count on December 31, 2021. Michael Corporation normally sells at 30% gross profit based on selling price. 3) Goods were in transit FOB destination from a supplier in the amount of P120,000. Further testing revealed that the supplier's invoice pertaining to the delivery was received and recorded on December 28, 2021. 4) Good costing P70,000 had been received on December 31 and recorded as a purchase. However, upon your inspection, the goods were found to be defective and would be immediately returned. 5) Materials costing P224,000, sold and billed on December 30 under a “bill and hold” agreement, had been segregated in the…arrow_forwardAs the senior auditor assigned to the audit of Mayberry Company’s financial statement for the year-ended 31 December 2020. You are reviewing the financial statements and observed that current revenue reported amounted to US$ 18m and US$ 17m for the previous year. The financial report contains the following sections: Chairman’s statement in which the chairman has commented that he is pleased to report an increase in revenue of 20% this year. ii. CEO’s review Corporate Social Responsibility Report iv. Operating review Financial Statements vi. Notes to the Financial Statements Required: What is the significance of the Chairman’s statement in the financial statements? Identify the sections that would be included in ‘other information’ in the auditor’s report. Describe the implications(s) of the section ‘other information’ in the auditor’s report as it relates to Mayberry Company. Why should the auditor refer to the Chairman’s statement in the auditor’s…arrow_forwardMichael Corporation is on a calendar year basis. The following data were found during your audit:1) An excerpt from the client’s trial balance revealed the following account balances:Accounts receivable P 80,000Inventory, per count 1,200,000Accounts payable 790,000Net sales 6,050,000Net purchases 3,300,000Net income 610,0002) The client conducted an inventory count on December 31, 2021. Michael Corporation normally sells at 30% gross profit based on selling price.3) Goods were in transit FOB destination from a supplier in the amount of P120,000. Further testing revealed that the suppliers invoice pertaining to the delivery was received and recorded on December 28, 2021.4) Good costing P70,000 had been received on December 31, and recorded as a purchase. However, upon your inspection, the goods were found to be defective and would be immediately returned.5) Materials costing P224,000, sold and billed on December 30 under a “bill and hold” agreement, had been segregated in the warehouse…arrow_forward
- 8. The Clarity, Inc. has determined its 2018 profit to be P5,000,000. In an initial audit of the company's financial statements, you determined the following: Revenue received in advance in 2018 of P250,000 was credited to a revenue account when received. Of the total, P50,000 was earned in 2018, P120,000 will be earned in 2019, and the remainder will be earned in 2020. No adjustment was made at the end of 2018. P150,000 unrealized loss on FVPL (financial assets at fair value through profit or loss) in 2018 was erroneously debited to other comprehensive income account. What is the corrected profit for the year 2018? A. P4,600,000. B. P4,650,000. C. P4,850,000. D. P4,930,000.arrow_forwardYou are the audit senior working on the audit of Reef Building Supplies Limited (RBS), a large supplier of building materials, for the year ended 30 June 2020. While completing your risk assessment of RBS, you know that the company appears to have a significant debt recovery problem. The majority of RBS’s accounts receivable were outstanding for more than 60 days. RBS’s provision for doubtful debts is currently calculated at 1% of Accounts Receivable at month end. In the previous two financial years, RBS wrote off $760,000 and $1,050,00 worth of Accounts Receivable, respectively. In those years sales were $7,000,000 and $11,200,000, respectively. Required: Describe the substantive procedures you will carry out at year-end in order to obtain sufficient audit evidence regarding the assertions of valuation and existence in relation to Accounts Receivablearrow_forwardYou are the audit senior working on the audit of Tesco Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2020. While completing your risk assessment of Tesco, you note that the company appears to have a significant debt-recovery problem. The majority of Tesco’s accounts receivable are outstanding for more than 60 days. Tesco’s provision for doubtful debts is currently calculated at 1 per cent of accounts receivable at month-end. In the previous two financial years, Tesco wrote off $380 000 and $425 000 worth of accounts receivable, respectively. In those years, sales were $3 500 000 and $5 650 000, respectively. REQUIRED: (A) Identify the two key assertions most at risk of material misstatement in relation to accounts receivable and provide explanation why each of these assertions is at risk. (B) Describe the substantive procedures you will perform at year end to obtain sufficient audit evidence for each assertion identified in (A).arrow_forward
- Dunder-Mifflin Inc. wanted to expand its manufacturing and sales facilities. The company applied for a loan from First Bank, presenting the prior-year audited financial statements and the forecast for the current year shown inExhibit 4.56.1. (Dunder-Mifflin Inc.’s fiscal year-end is December 31.) The bank was impressed with the business prospects and granted a $1,750,000 loan at 8 percent interest to finance working capital and the new facilities that were placed in service July 1 of the current year. Because Dunder-Mifflin Inc. planned to issue stock for permanent financing, the bank made the loan due on December 31 of the following year. Interest is payable each calendar quarter on October 1 of the current year and January 1, April 1, July 1, October 1 of the following year.The auditors’ interviews with Dunder-Mifflin Inc. management near the end of the current year produced the following information: The facilities did not cost as much as previously anticipated. However, sales were…arrow_forwardAssume you work as an assistant to the chief financial officer (CFO) of Fashions First, Inc. TheCFO reminds you that the fiscal year-end is only two weeks away and that he is looking to you toensure the company stays in compliance with its loan covenant to maintain a debt-to-assets ratio ofno more than 75 percent. A review of the general ledger indicates that assets total $690,000 and liabilities are $570,000. Your company has an excess of Cash ($300,000) and an equally large balancein Accounts Payable ($270,000), although none of its Accounts Payable are due until next month.Required:1. Determine whether the company is currently in compliance with its loan covenant.2. Assuming the level of assets and liabilities remains unchanged until the last day of the fiscalyear, evaluate whether Fashions First should pay down $210,000 of its Accounts Payable onthe last day of the year, before the Accounts Payable become duearrow_forwardCasey Emberton is conducting the audit of Jackson Inc. as of December 31, 2020. At the beginning of the evidence gathering, Emberton becomes aware that one of Jackson’s major customers (Perry) has been experiencing significant financial difficulties since November 2020 and there is doubt about their continued survival. Perry normally accounts for 5 percent of Jackson’s net sales. After performing the necessary procedures, Emberton believes that $2.8 million of Perry’s receivable balance will ultimately become uncollectible. Emberton further believes this amount is material to Jackson’s financial condition and results of operations. Describe the most appropriate course of action that the auditors should take – What should they require of the client?).arrow_forward
Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...AccountingISBN:9781337115773Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. HeitgerPublisher:Cengage Learning
Financial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781305088436Author:Carl Warren, Jim Reeve, Jonathan DuchacPublisher:Cengage Learning