EBK AUDITING & ASSURANCE SERVICES: A SY
EBK AUDITING & ASSURANCE SERVICES: A SY
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781260687668
Author: Jr
Publisher: MCGRAW-HILL LEARNING SOLN.(CC)
bartleby

Concept explainers

Question
Book Icon
Chapter 3, Problem 3.32P

a

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is important to audit practice. It is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk. Materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant. Once misstatements are identified, the auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

The overall materiality and tolerable misstatement using income before taxes for the year 2018.

a

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 3.32P

  • Determination of Materiality.
  • Income before taxes, $25,950,000 or 25.95 million

  • Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes = $12,975,000 or 12.98 million

Explanation of Solution

Determination of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

If the current year income before tax is not stable “normalized earnings” − last three years average income before tax can be usedto assess overall Materiality.

Average of Last three years = $584+$520+$4533=$519

  • Determination of Materiality.
  • When 5 percent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality, the materiality of M&J will be:

    Income before taxes, $25,950,000 = $519,000,000×0.05

    Or 25.95 million

  • Determination of tolerable misstatement.
  • The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 percent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, 50 percent of tolerable misstatement is assumed.

    Income before taxes = $12,975,000 = $25,950,000×0.5

    Or 12.97 million.

b

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is important to audit practice. It is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk. Materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant. Once misstatements are identified, the auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement using either total assets or total revenues as the benchmark anduse .25% and 2% for calculation.

b

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 3.32P

    2018201720162015
    Overall Materiality at .25%
    Total Assets (million)$58.55$40.34$33.1$29.9
    Total Revenue (million)$50.7$33.22$23$22.46
    Tolerable misstatement:
    Total Assets (million)29.320.1716.5514.95
    Total Revenue (million)25.3516.6111.511.23
    Overall Materiality at 2%
    Total Assets (million)$468.44$322.7$264.8$239.32
    Total Revenue (million)$405.44$265.8$183.8$179.7
    Tolerable misstatement:
    Total Assets (million)$234.22$161.35$132.4$119.66
    Total Revenue (million)$202.72$132.89$92$89.85

Explanation of Solution

a. Determination of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.

  • Determination of Materiality.
  • When.25 percent of the benchmark is taken for overall materiality.

    2018:

    Total revenue, $50.7 million = $20,272×0.0025

    Total Assets, $58.55 million = $23,422×0.0025

    2017:

    Total revenue, $33.22 million = $13,289×0.0025

    Total Assets, $40.34 million = $16,137×0.0025

    2016:

    Total revenue, $23 million = $9,189×0.0025

    Total Assets, $33.1 million = $13,239×0.0025

    2015:

    Total revenue, $22.46 million = $8,984×0.0025

    Total Assets, $29.9 million = $11,966×0.0025

    Assuming 2 percent of the benchmark is appropriate for overall materiality.

    2018:

    Total revenue, $405.44 million = $20,272×0.02

    Total Assets, $468.44 million = $23,422×0.02

    2017:

    Total revenue, $265.8 million = $13,289×0.02

    Total Assets, $322.7 million = $16,137×0.02

    2016:

    Total revenue, $183.8 million = $9,189×0.02

    Total Assets, $264.8 million = $13,239×0.02

    2015:

    Total revenue, $179.7 million = $8,984×0.02

    Total Assets, $239.32 million = $11,966×0.02

  • Determination of tolerable misstatement.
  • The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 percent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 percent of tolerable misstatement.

    Tolerable misstatement for .25 percent overall materiality

    2018:

    Total revenue, $25.35 million = $50.7×0.5

    Total Assets, $29.3 million = $58.55×0.5

    2017:

    Total revenue, $16.61million = $33.22×0.5

    Total Assets, $20.17 million = $40.34×0.5

    2016:

    Total revenue, $11.5 million = $23×0.5

    Total Assets, $16.55 million = $33.1×0.5

    2015:

    Total revenue, $11.23 million = $22.46×0.5

    Total Assets, $14.95 million = $29.9×0.5

    Tolerable misstatement for 2 percent overall materiality

    2018:

    Total revenue, $207.25 million = $414.5×0.5

    Total Assets, $234.22 million = $468.44×0.5

    2017:

    Total revenue, $132.89 million = $265.8×0.5

    Total Assets, $161.35 million = $322.7×0.5

    2016:

    Total revenue, $92 million = $183.8×0.5

    Total Assets, $132.4 million = $264.8×0.5

    2015:

    Total revenue, $89.85 million = $179.7×0.5

    Total Assets, $119.66 million = $239.32×0.5

c

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is important to audit practice. It is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk. Materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant. Once misstatements are identified, the auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

The overall materiality of misstatement of $50 million based on calculations in part a, and b.

c

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 3.32P

A misstatement is material in case of income before tax and immaterial when done using total assets and total revenue.

Explanation of Solution

a. Evaluation of misstatements of an overstatement of income of $50 million.

The misstatements and tolerable misstatement are compared with each other. If misstatement is greater than tolerable misstatement or if aggregate misstatements were greater than overall materiality, the business has to correct the financial statements or else auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

When theincome before taxes is evaluated for overall materiality in case of KR,there is a misstatement of $50 million in 2018 which is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

Income before taxes:

KR’s overall materiality is $25.95 million and tolerable misstatement is $12.98 million, even if the average of last three year is taken to determine materiality.

Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust misstatement in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

Total Assets

KR overall materiality and tolerable misstatement are above misstatement of $50 million.

As misstatement is below than the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement, it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Total revenue

KR overall materiality and tolerable misstatement are above misstatement of $50 million.

As misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement, it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
2. Construct profit diagrams or profit tables on expiration to show what position in AMZN puts, calls and/or underlying stock best expresses the investor’s objectives described below. Assume AMZN currently sells for $150 so that profit diagrams/ tables between $100 and $200 (in $10 increments) are appropriate. Also assume that “at the money” puts and calls cost $15 each. (As usual, the profit calculations ignore dividends and interest.) 1 (a) An investor wants upside potential if AMZN increases but wants (net) losses no greater than $15 if prices decline. (b) An investor wants to capture profits if AMZN declines in price but wants a guaranteed limited loss if prices increase. (c) An investor wants to capture profits if AMZN declines in price and is ready to accept unlimited losses if prices increase. Further, the investor wants to break even if the stock price does not change between now and the maturity of the options. (d) An investor wants to profit if AMZN’s upcoming earnings…
Don't used Ai solution
See the chart below. The top line shows the 90 day yield on corporate bonds and the bottom line is the US Treasury bill (TB) rate for similar maturity. The yield is shown on the y-axis. Notice that the gap between the two curves got wider during the recession years of 2008-2009. Which of the following reasons can possibly explain this widening? FRED 6 сл 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 2006 · 1950 2008 2010 2012 2014 Shaded areas indicate US recessions - 2014 research.stlouisfed.org A) During the recession, the government decided to cut the tax rate on interest earned from corporate bonds but not on interest earned on TB. B) During the recession, the relative risk on corporate bonds increased. C) During the recession, the relative liquidity of corporate bonds increased. D) Two of the first three options can explain this. E) All of the first three options can explain this.
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Finance
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, finance and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Financial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:9781305088436
Author:Carl Warren, Jim Reeve, Jonathan Duchac
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
CONCEPTS IN FED.TAX., 2020-W/ACCESS
Accounting
ISBN:9780357110362
Author:Murphy
Publisher:CENGAGE L