Videos
a
Introduction:
Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the
Scenario 1
The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $1.25 million.
a
Answer to Problem 3.31P
- Determination of Materiality.
Income before taxes, $1,050,000
Total Assets, $27,500,000
Total revenue, $38,750,000
- Determination of tolerable misstatement.
Income before taxes, $525,000
Total Assets, $1,375,000
Total revenue, $19,375,000
- The overstatement should be adjusted, or auditor would give a qualified opinion
Explanation of Solution
- Determination of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.
- Determination of Materiality.
- Determination of tolerable misstatement.
- Evaluation of two misstatements aggregated to an overstatement of income of $1.25 million.
when 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:
Total revenue, $38,750,000 =
Total Assets, $27,500,000 =
Income before taxes, $1,050,000 =
The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement.
Income before taxes = $525,000 =
Total Assets, $1,375,000 =
Total revenue, $19,375,000 =
The misstatements and tolerable misstatement are compared with each other. If misstatement is greater than tolerable misstatement or if aggregate misstatements were greater than overall materiality, the business has to correct the financial statements or else auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.
In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.
Income before taxes:
M&J overall materiality $1.05 million and tolerable misstatement $525,000.
Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust to $1.25 million in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.
Total Assets
M&J overall materiality $27.5 million and tolerable misstatement $1.375 million.
As aggregated misstatement is an overstatement of income and no information is available about its effect on assets it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.
Total revenue
M&J overall materiality $38.75 million and tolerable misstatement $19.375 million.
Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust $1.25 million overstatements if it is related to revenue in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.
b
Introduction:
Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.
Scenario 2
The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.
b
Answer to Problem 3.31P
- Determination of Materiality.
Income before taxes, $2,000,000
Total Assets, $215,000,000
Total revenue, $45,000,000
- Determination of tolerable misstatement.
Income before taxes = $1,000,000
Total Assets, $107,500,000
Total revenue, $22,500,000
Explanation of Solution
- Determination of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.
- Determination of Materiality.
- When 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:
- Determination of tolerable misstatement.
- Evaluation of misstatements of an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.
Total revenue, $45,000,000 =
Total Assets, $215,000,000 =
Income before taxes, $2,000,000 =
The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement.
Total revenue, $22,500,000 =
Total Assets, $107,500,000 =
Income before taxes = $1,000,000 =
The misstatements and tolerable misstatement are compared with each other. If misstatement is greater than tolerable misstatement or if aggregate misstatements were greater than overall materiality, the business has to correct the financial statements or else auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.
In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.
Income before taxes:
M&J overall materiality $2 million and tolerable misstatement $1 million.
Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust misstatement in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.
Total Assets
M&J overall materiality $215 million and tolerable misstatement $107.5 million.
As aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.
Total revenue
M&J overall materiality $45 million and tolerable misstatement $22.5 million.
Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust $5.75 million overstatements if it is related to revenue in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.
c
Introduction:
Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.
Scenario 3
The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.
c
Answer to Problem 3.31P
- Determination of Materiality.
Income before taxes, $25,000
Total Assets, $110,000,000
Total revenue, $350,000,000
- Determination of tolerable misstatement.
Income before taxes, $12,500
Total Assets, $55,000,000
Total revenue, $175,000,000
Explanation of Solution
- Calculation of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.
- Determination of Materiality.
- Determination of tolerable misstatement.
- Evaluation of misstatements of an overstatement of income of $1.5 million. The misstatements and tolerable misstatement are compared with each other. If misstatement is greater than tolerable misstatement or if aggregate misstatements were greater than overall materiality the business has to correct the financial statements or else auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.
When 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:
Total revenue, $350,000,000 =
Total Assets, $110,000,000 =
Income before taxes, $25,000 =
The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement
Total revenue, $175,000,000 =
Total Assets, $55,000,000 =
Income before taxes = $12,500 =
In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.
Income before taxes:
M&J overall materiality $25,000 and tolerable misstatement $12,500.
Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust misstatement in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.
Total Assets
M&J overall materiality $110 million and tolerable misstatement $55 million.
As aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.
Total revenue
M&J overall materiality $350 million and tolerable misstatement $175 million.
Thus, it can be concluded that aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 3 Solutions
AUDITING RMU
- Regarding Murphy Ltd: Three (3) account areas that are at risk of material misstatement. For each account area identified above, one (1) key assertion that could be at risk. The audit procedures you would perform to gather sufficient appropriate evidence for each assertion Murphy Ltd Finally, Wayne tells you about Murphy Ltd, a large client with a diverse set of operations. During Wayne’s audit of Murphy he found the following: Murphy manufactures wheat, yeast and various other goods needed to bake bread which it exports to bakers in Saudi Arabia. Recently the Saudi Arabian currency (Saudi riyal) has fallen in value and a number of Murphy’s customers are unable to settle their accounts. By the end of the year, Murphy is expecting to have outstanding receivables in excess of $1 million. Murphy also manufactures soft drink. Part of Murphy’s agreement with its distributors is that Murphy will supply fridges and advertising signs for the distributors to use. These fridges are rented to…arrow_forwardYou are the manager in charge of the audit of Nananom Company, a public limited liability company which manufactures specialist equipment and costumes for use in Kumahwood and Nafftti films in Ghana. Audited revenue is Ghc 100 million with profit before tax of Ghc 6.25 million. Audit work up to but not including, the obtaining of written representations has been completed. A review of the audit file has disclosed the following outstanding point: Kumahwood Nananom Company is facing a potential legal claim from the Kumahwood company in respect of a defective equipment that was supplied for one of their films. Kumahwood sustains that the equipment built was not robust enough, while the directors of Nananom argue that the specification was not sufficiently detailed. Nananom were of the view that using such sophisticated equipment under conditions that require heavy falls, may render them not in the best of working conditions after a couple of films produced. However, this is what Kumahwood…arrow_forwardYou are reviewing the results of the Firestone audit. These are the details of the summay of identified misstatements: • Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: $60,000 misstatement (over) • Sales Revenue: $10,000 misstatement (under) • Total identified misstatements: $50,000 (impact on Assets, pre-tax income, and equity) • Performance materiality was set at $60,000 REQUIRED: a) If overall materaility for the audit was set at $30,000, what type of audit report would be issued? Why? b) If overall materiality for the audit was set at $75,000, what type of audit report would be issued? Why?arrow_forward
- You are auditing a manufacturing company ABC Co. with a profit before tax $2400,000, andthe following information comes to light about your client:1- ABC Co has significant plant and machinery which it uses to make its products.During the year the efficiency of the company’s machinery was improvedsignificantly. This was because a comprehensive review of each piece of machinerywas undertaken and an assessment was made as to whether a minor repair,extensive refurbishment or a complete replacement was needed. ABC then took theappropriate action in each case and spent a total of $600,000 in doing so.2- Following some ratios that obtained from the client, compared with the industryratios2018 2019 Industry averageGross profit[% of totalsales]Dr ARCr Sales%42 %65 40%Credit Sales[% of totalsales]40% 75% 35%Receivables Turn over 4.56 2.41 5.1Inventory % of Totalassets24.7% 28.2% 23.4%Inventory Turn over 2.15 1.75 2.21Current Ratio 2.31 1.15 2.35Requirement:A- Considering the audit risk in…arrow_forwardFor the following independent situations, assume that you are the audit partner on the engagement: 1. The client recorded impairment of goodwill for $40,000 last year. It recorded reversal of impairment in goodwill for $20,000 this year after considering the carrying amount and recoverable amount of the cash generating unit. Net income is $10,000 in current year. Discuss the most appropriate type of opinion the auditor should issue. Explain briefly the reason for the opinion.arrow_forwardYou are an audit manager of Cranberry & Co and you are currently responsible for the audit of Gooseberry Co, a company which develops and manufactures health and beauty products and distributes these to wholesale customers. Its draft profit before tax is $6·4m and total assets are $37·2m for the financial year ended 31 January 20X8. Question You are an audit manager of Cranberry & Co and you are currently responsible for the audit of Gooseberry Co, a company which develops and manufactures health and beauty products and distributes these to wholesale customers. Its draft profit before tax is $6·4m and total assets are $37·2m for the financial year ended 31 January 20X8. The final audit is due to commence shortly and the following matters have been brought to your attention: Research and development Gooseberry Co spent $1·9m in the current year developing nine new health and beauty products, all of which are at different stages of development. Once they meet the recognition…arrow_forward
- Indicate whether you agree or disagree with the following statements and explain your reasoning. Teresa Dziuba was assigned to the Heathcliff Energy audit. She was ensuring that when recognizing revenues, all transactions and events that should have been recorded have been recorded. She was testing the existence assertion. Assume materiality for the financial statements as a whole is $200,000 and performance materiality for accounts receivable is set at $80,000. If the auditor finds one receivable that is overstated by $110,000, the auditor can ignore the error as it is less than $200,000 (overall materiality). Steve Slopak, the group partner was reviewing the work of Manny Fernandez on the Lake Shore Gold account. Manny asked Steve for an explanation on how audit risk_ould affect his work. Steve answered: “Audit risk affects the quantity and quality of evidence gathering."arrow_forwardYou are auditing a manufacturing company ABC Co. with a profit before tax $2400,000, and the following information comes to light about your client: 1- ABC Co has significant plant and machinery which it uses to make its products. During the year the efficiency of the company's machinery was improved significantly. This was because a comprehensive review of each piece of machinery was undertaken and an assessment was made as to whether a minor repair, extensive refurbishment or a complete replacement was needed. ABC then took the appropriate action in each case and spent a total of $600,000 in doing so. 2. Following some ratios that obtained from the client, compared with the industry ratios Industry average Gross profit[% of total %42 sales) Credit Salesl% of total 75% sales) Receivables Turn over Inventory % of Total 24.7% 28.2% assets Inventory Turn over 2.15 1.75 2.21 Current Ratio 1.15 2018 2019 %65 40% 40% 35% 4.56 2.41 5.1 23.4% 2.31 2.35 Requirement: A- Considering the audit…arrow_forwardJones, CPA, has completed the audit of Sarack Lumber Supply Co.and has issued a standard unqualified report. In addition to a report on the overall financialstatements, the company needs a special audited report on three specific accounts: sales,net fixed assets, and inventory valued at FIFO. The report is to be issued to Sarack’s lessor,who bases annual rentals on these three accounts. Jones was not aware of the need for thereport on the three specific accounts until after the overall audit was completed.a. Explain why Jones is unlikely to be able to issue the audit report on the three specificaccounts without additional audit tests.b. What additional tests are likely to be needed before the report on the three specificaccounts can be issued?c. Assuming that Jones is able to satisfy all the requirements needed to issue the reporton the three specific accounts, write the report. Make any necessary assumptions.arrow_forward
- Kindly solve the below question. Regardsarrow_forwardYou are an employee of Dick and Associates’ Auditing Firm. The company take on an engagement to audit Full Bright Company Limited. The engagement was divided into segments such as receivables, payables, cash and bank, inventories and non- current assets and each segment is headed by an audit senior. The audited of the non -current assets was assigned to you. After reviewing the financial statement, you re-cognized that non-current assets values 500 million and current assets values 400 million. A machine values 250 million was acquired by Full Bright Co. Ltd during the period under audit. You also noticed that the Depreciation on some of the assets were not calculated properly. The company did not keep a fixed asset registry. NB. The company has no Goodwill. a) Discuss at least four (4) audit procedures you would perform in completing your audit on the non-current assets. b)…arrow_forwardYou are required to obtain the annual reports of two ASX Top 200 companies in the sameindustry and write a business research report to address the following questions related to theitems included in property, plant and equipment.1. Review and evaluate the PPE disclosure of your selected companies which may include:• What range of measures is used to determine amounts for these items in the reports ofthe individual companies?• Do you think it is valid to add the items, given the measures used?• How would you interpret the total amount for property, plant and equipment in thefinancial statements?• Compare the measures used by the different companies for similar items. Are there anyinconsistencies in how similar items are measured by the different companies?2. Discuss the factors that accountants should consider when setting up company accountingpolicy relating to PPE.3. Detail your view on the subsequent measurement of PPE and provide recommendations toaccounting standard setters.arrow_forward
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...AccountingISBN:9781305080577Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:South-Western College Pub
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage Learning