Subpart (a):
Calculate the member of required labor.
Subpart (a):
Explanation of Solution
Number of workers required to produce one unit of goods can be calculated using the following formula.
Substitute the respective values in Equation (1) to calculate the required number of person to produce one unit of car in U.S.
Required labor to produce one unit of car in U.S. is 0.25.
Table 1 illustrates the workers required to produce a car and a ton of grain in the U.S. and the Japan that obtained by using Equation (1).
Table 1
Workers required to produce | ||
One Car | One Ton of Grain | |
U.S. | 0.25 workers | 0.10 workers |
Japan | 0.25 workers | 0.20 workers |
Concept introduction:
Subpart (b):
Draw the production possibility frontier.
Subpart (b):
Explanation of Solution
Figure 1 shows the productive capacity of two countries.
In Figure 1, the horizontal axis measures the quantity of grains produced by both the countries and the vertical axis measures the quantity of cars produced. If either economy, that is, the U.S. or Japan devotes all of its 100 million workers in producing cars each economy can produce 400 million cars in a year
Concept introduction:
Production Possibility Frontier (PPF): PPF refers to the maximum possible combinations of output of goods or services that an economy can attain by efficiently utilizing and employing full resources.
Subpart (c):
Calculate the opportunity cost.
Subpart (c):
Explanation of Solution
Opportunity cost of a car for the U.S. is calculated as follows.
Thus, the opportunity cost of a car for the U.S. is 2.5 tons of grains.
Opportunity cost of a car for Japan is calculated as follows.
Thus, the opportunity cost of a car for Japan is 1.25 tons of grains.
Opportunity cost of producing a ton of grains in the U.S. is calculated as follows
Thus, the opportunity cost of producing a ton of grains in the U.S. is 0.4 units of cars.
Opportunity cost of producing a ton of grains in Japan is calculated as follows.
Thus, the opportunity cost of producing a ton of grains in Japan is 0.8 units of cars.
The results can be tabulated in Table 2 below.
Table 2
Opportunity Cost | ||
One Car | One Ton of Grain | |
U.S. | 2.5 tons of grains | 0.4 units of car |
Japan | 1.25 tons of grains | 0.8 units of car |
Concept introduction:
Opportunity cost: Opportunity cost is the cost of a foregone alternative, that is, the loss of other alternative when one alternative is chosen.
Subpart (d):
Find the country that has absolute advantage in the production of goods.
Subpart (d):
Explanation of Solution
Neither of these countries has an absolute advantage in producing cars. This is because they are equally productive in the production of a car (4 cars per worker per year). However, in the production of grains, the United States has an absolute advantage because it is more productive than Japan. The U.S. can produce 10 tons of grains per worker per year; whereas Japan can produce only 5 tons of grains per worker per year.
Concept introduction:
Absolute advantage: It is the ability to produce a good using fewer inputs than another producer.
Subpart (e):
Find the country that has absolute advantage in the production of goods.
Subpart (e):
Explanation of Solution
Japan has a
Concept introduction:
Comparative advantage: It refers to the ability to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than another producer.
Subpart (f):
Calculate the total production before the trade.
Subpart (f):
Explanation of Solution
Without trade and with half the workers in each country producing each of the goods, the United States would produce 200 million cars
Concept introduction:
Trade: The trade refers to the exchange of capital, goods, and services across different countries.
Subpart (g):
Gains from trade for the U.S. and Japan.
Subpart (g):
Explanation of Solution
Firstly, consider the situation without trade in which each country is producing some cars and some grains. Suppose the United States shifts its one worker from producing cars to producing grain, then that worker would produce 4 cars and 10 additional tons of grain. Now suppose, with trade, the United States offers to trade 7 tons of grain to Japan for 4 cars. The United States would encourage this because the cost of producing 4 cars in the United States is 10 tons of grain. So by trading, the United States can gain 4 cars for a cost of only 7 tons of grain. Hence, it is better off by 3 tons of grain.
The same is applicable for Japan, if Japan changes one worker from producing grain to producing cars. That worker would produce 4 more cars and 5 fewer tons of grain. Japan will take the trade because Japan will be better off by 2 tons of grain.
So with the trade and the change of one worker in both the United States and Japan, each country gets the same amount of cars as before but gets additional tons of grain (3 tons of grains for the United States and 2 tons of grains for Japan) making both countries better off.
Concept introduction:
Trade: The trade refers to the exchange of capital, goods, and services across different countries.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 3 Solutions
Bundle: Principles of Macroeconomics, Loose-Leaf Version, 7th + LMS Integrated Aplia, 1 term Printed Access Card
- In USA one unit of labor can produce 25 computers or 25 bushels of wheat. In Thailand one unit of labor can make 30 computers or 50 bushels of wheat. Assume that computers and wheat are the only two goods in the world. (What is the purpose of this assumption?) a. What is USA's opportunity cost of making a computer? What is Thailand's opportunity cost of making a computer? b. What is USA's opportunity cost of producing a bushel of wheat? What is Thailand's opportunity cost of producing a bushel of wheat? c. Does USA have comparative advantage in producing anything? Explain. d. Does Thailand have comparative advantage in producing anything? Explain. e. Is it possible for USA to gain by trading with Thailand? Explain. f. Is it possible for Thailand to gain by trading with USA? Explain. h. Do you think they can trade? (HINT: outside of PPF)arrow_forwardComparing your answers in the previous questions suggests that the opportunity cost of producing 50 million additional garments of clothing at point B is______ (choose between these: less than, greater than or equal to). and the opportunity cost of producing 50 million additional garments of clothing at point A. This reflects the________ (choose between: notion that countries can gain from trade, fact that resources are scarce or law of increasing opportunity costs)arrow_forwardSuppose that in a year, a worker in China can produce 100 books or 20 televisions, while a worker in India can produce 100 books or 10 televisions. a. What is the opportunity cost of producing an additional book in each country? b. If the two countries trade with each other, which country should export which good and why? For trade to occur between China and India, what must be the international price of books? c. Suppose that China and India each have 100 workers. If each country decides to devote half of its workers to each industry, how many books and televisions does each country produce? What is the world output of books and televisions? d. Now, suppose that each country specializes by devoting all of its workers to the industry in which it has a comparative advantage. In this case, what is the world output of books and televisions?arrow_forward
- Draw the production possibility curve for each country using the data provided in the table. b. Which country has an absolute advantage in what product? Which country has a comparative advantage in what product? Show your work! c. Without trade, what is the price of food in terms of computers for both countries? Showyour work! d. What is the range of prices (i.e., the CPC) at which trade can occur? Also, show (a) the possible CPC for each country and (b) the possible production and consumption possibility lines for both countries after trade. Show your work!arrow_forwardSuppose a worker in Germany can produce 15 cars or 5 tonnes of grain per month. Suppose a worker in Poland can produce 4 cars or 4 tonnes of grain per month. For simplicity, assume that each country has only one worker. a. Fill out the following table? Cars in number Grain in tonnes Germany Poland b. Graph the production possibilities frontier for each country? c. What is the opportunity cost of a Car in Germany? What is the opportunity cost of a tonne of Grain in Germany? d. What is the opportunity cost of a Car in Poland? What is the opportunity cost of a ton of Grain in Poland?arrow_forwardSuppose that Germany can produce at most 150 cars or 50 tractors per month. France can produce at most 40 cars or 80 tractors per month. Graph and explain the opportunity costs facing each country.arrow_forward
- What is the term for a situation in which a country can produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than another country? A. Absolute advantage B. Comparative advantage C. Opportunity advantage D. Trade advantagearrow_forwardDavid and Rose both work as artists. David can produce 3 small sculptures each day or 18 paintings. Rose can produce 2 sculptures or 6 paintings each day. What is the opportunity cost of sculpting for David? paintings Part 2 Who has a comparative advantage at sculpting? David Rose neither David nor Rose both David an d Rosearrow_forwardSuppose two countries produce the same twogoods and have identical production possibilitiesfrontiers. Do you expect these countries to trade?Explain why or why not.arrow_forward
- C O O O Suppose that Canada can make 45 kilograms of cheese or 60 bottles of wine with one year's worth of labour. France can make 30 kilograms of cheese or 54 bottles of wine with one year's worth of labour. What can we conclude from these numbers? a. Canada has a comparative advantage in the production of wine. b. Canada has an absolute advantage in the production of cheese. c. France has an absolute advantage in the production of wine. d. France has a comparative advantage in the production of cheese.arrow_forwardImagine that it takes an average Australian miner 10 hours to mine a metric ton of coal and 20 hours to mine a metric ton of manganese. It takes the average South African miner 4 hours to mine a metric ton of coal and 12 hours to mine metric ton of manganese.Create a table to show how productive each miner is in a day. a. In what task does each miner have a comparative advantage? b. Which resource will each country import? How about export? c. Explain how markets provide the opportunity for the mining companies to specialize and earn gains from trade.arrow_forwardSuppose that in an hour an American worker can produce 200 clothes or 20 cars, while a Brazillian worker can produce 150 clothes or 10 cars. Each country has 8 hours available. Who has a comparative advantage in the production of clothes? Who has a comparative advantage in the production of cars? What is the opportunity cost for cars?arrow_forward
- Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningBrief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...EconomicsISBN:9781337091985Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning