
Subpart (a):
Calculate the member of required labor.
Subpart (a):

Explanation of Solution
Number of workers required to produce one unit of goods can be calculated using the following formula.
Substitute the respective values in Equation (1) to calculate the required number of person to produce one unit of car in U.S.
Required labor to produce one unit of car in U.S. is 0.25.
Table 1 illustrates the workers required to produce a car and a ton of grain in the U.S. and the Japan that obtained by using Equation (1).
Table 1
Workers required to produce | ||
One Car | One Ton of Grain | |
U.S. | 0.25 workers | 0.10 workers |
Japan | 0.25 workers | 0.20 workers |
Concept introduction:
Subpart (b):
Draw the production possibility frontier.
Subpart (b):

Explanation of Solution
Figure 1 shows the productive capacity of two countries.
In Figure 1, the horizontal axis measures the quantity of grains produced by both the countries and the vertical axis measures the quantity of cars produced. If either economy, that is, the U.S. or Japan devotes all of its 100 million workers in producing cars each economy can produce 400 million cars in a year
Concept introduction:
Production Possibility Frontier (PPF): PPF refers to the maximum possible combinations of output of goods or services that an economy can attain by efficiently utilizing and employing full resources.
Subpart (c):
Calculate the opportunity cost.
Subpart (c):

Explanation of Solution
Opportunity cost of a car for the U.S. is calculated as follows.
Thus, the opportunity cost of a car for the U.S. is 2.5 tons of grains.
Opportunity cost of a car for Japan is calculated as follows.
Thus, the opportunity cost of a car for Japan is 1.25 tons of grains.
Opportunity cost of producing a ton of grains in the U.S. is calculated as follows
Thus, the opportunity cost of producing a ton of grains in the U.S. is 0.4 units of cars.
Opportunity cost of producing a ton of grains in Japan is calculated as follows.
Thus, the opportunity cost of producing a ton of grains in Japan is 0.8 units of cars.
The results can be tabulated in Table 2 below.
Table 2
Opportunity Cost | ||
One Car | One Ton of Grain | |
U.S. | 2.5 tons of grains | 0.4 units of car |
Japan | 1.25 tons of grains | 0.8 units of car |
Concept introduction:
Opportunity cost: Opportunity cost is the cost of a foregone alternative, that is, the loss of other alternative when one alternative is chosen.
Subpart (d):
Find the country that has absolute advantage in the production of goods.
Subpart (d):

Explanation of Solution
Neither of these countries has an absolute advantage in producing cars. This is because they are equally productive in the production of a car (4 cars per worker per year). However, in the production of grains, the United States has an absolute advantage because it is more productive than Japan. The U.S. can produce 10 tons of grains per worker per year; whereas Japan can produce only 5 tons of grains per worker per year.
Concept introduction:
Absolute advantage: It is the ability to produce a good using fewer inputs than another producer.
Subpart (e):
Find the country that has absolute advantage in the production of goods.
Subpart (e):

Explanation of Solution
Japan has a
Concept introduction:
Comparative advantage: It refers to the ability to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than another producer.
Subpart (f):
Calculate the total production before the trade.
Subpart (f):

Explanation of Solution
Without trade and with half the workers in each country producing each of the goods, the United States would produce 200 million cars
Concept introduction:
Trade: The trade refers to the exchange of capital, goods, and services across different countries.
Subpart (g):
Gains from trade for the U.S. and Japan.
Subpart (g):

Explanation of Solution
Firstly, consider the situation without trade in which each country is producing some cars and some grains. Suppose the United States shifts its one worker from producing cars to producing grain, then that worker would produce 4 cars and 10 additional tons of grain. Now suppose, with trade, the United States offers to trade 7 tons of grain to Japan for 4 cars. The United States would encourage this because the cost of producing 4 cars in the United States is 10 tons of grain. So by trading, the United States can gain 4 cars for a cost of only 7 tons of grain. Hence, it is better off by 3 tons of grain.
The same is applicable for Japan, if Japan changes one worker from producing grain to producing cars. That worker would produce 4 more cars and 5 fewer tons of grain. Japan will take the trade because Japan will be better off by 2 tons of grain.
So with the trade and the change of one worker in both the United States and Japan, each country gets the same amount of cars as before but gets additional tons of grain (3 tons of grains for the United States and 2 tons of grains for Japan) making both countries better off.
Concept introduction:
Trade: The trade refers to the exchange of capital, goods, and services across different countries.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 3 Solutions
EBK PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS
- Consider the figure at the right. The profit of the single-price monopolist OA. is shown by area D+H+I+F+A. B. is shown by area A+I+F. OC. is shown by area D + H. ○ D. is zero. ○ E. cannot be calculated or shown with just the information given in the graph. (C) Price ($) B C D H FIG шо E MC ATC A MR D = AR Quantityarrow_forwardConsider the figure. A perfectly price-discriminating monopolist will produce ○ A. 162 units and charge a price equal to $69. ○ B. 356 units and charge a price equal to $52 for the last unit sold only. OC. 162 units and charge a price equal to $52. OD. 356 units and charge a price equal to the perfectly competitive price. Dollars per Unit $69 $52 MR 162 356 Output MC Darrow_forwardThe figure at right shows the demand line, marginal revenue line, and cost curves for a single-price monopolist. Now suppose the monopolist is able to charge a different price on each different unit sold. The profit-maximizing quantity for the monopolist is (Round your response to the nearest whole number.) The price charged for the last unit sold by this monopolist is $ (Round your response to the nearest dollar.) Price ($) 250 225- 200- The monopolist's profit is $ the nearest dollar.) (Round your response to MC 175- 150 ATC 125- 100- 75- 50- 25- 0- °- 0 20 40 60 MR 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Quantityarrow_forward
- The diagram shows a pharmaceutical firm's demand curve and marginal cost curve for a new heart medication for which the firm holds a 20-year patent on its production. At its profit-maximizing level of output, it will generate a deadweight loss to society represented by what? A. There is no deadweight loss generated. B. Area H+I+J+K OC. Area H+I D. Area D + E ◇ E. It is not possible to determine with the information provided. (...) 0 Price 0 m H B GI A MR MC D Outparrow_forwardConsider the figure on the right. A single-price monopolist will produce ○ A. 135 units and charge a price equal to $32. B. 135 units and generate a deadweight loss. OC. 189 units and charge a price equal to the perfectly competitive price. ○ D. 189 units and charge a price equal to $45. () Dollars per Unit $45 $32 MR D 135 189 Output MC NGarrow_forwardSuppose a drug company cannot prevent resale between rich and poor countries and increases output from 3 million (serving only the rich country with a price of $80 per treatment) to 9 million (serving both the rich and the poor countries with a price of $30 per treatment). Marginal cost is constant and equal to $10 per treatment in both countries. The marginal revenue per treatment of increasing output from 3 million to 9 million is equal to ○ A. $20 per treatment, which is greater than the marginal cost of $10 per treatment and thus implies that profits will rise. ○ B. $20 per treatment, which is greater than zero and thus implies that profits will rise. ○ C. $30 per treatment, which is greater than the marginal cost of $10 per treatment and thus implies that profits will rise. ○ D. $5 per treatment, which is less than the marginal cost of $10 per treatment and thus implies that profits will fall. ○ E. $30 per treatment, which is less than the marginal revenue of $80 per treatment…arrow_forward
- Consider the figure. A single-price monopolist will have a total revenue of Single-Price Monopolist OA. 84×$13. O B. 92x $13. OC. 84×$33. OD. 92 x $33. C Price ($) $33 $13 MC MR D 84 92 Output The figure is not drawn to scale.arrow_forward10.As COVID-19 came about, consumers' relationship with toilet paper changed and they found themselves desiring more than usual. Eventually, toilet paper producers saw an opportunity to make more money and meet the growing demand. Which best describes this scenario as depicted in Snell's 2020 article? A. The demand curve shifted left and the supply curve shifted left B. The demand curve shifted left and the supply curve shifted right C. The demand curve shifted right and the supply curve shifted left D. The demand curve shifted right and the supply curve shifted rightarrow_forward5. Supply and Demand. The graph below shows supply and demand curves for annual medical office visits. Using this graph, answer the questions below. P↑ $180 $150 $120 $90 $60 $30 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 a. If the market were free from government regulation, what would be the equilibrium price and quantity? b. Calculate total expenditures on office visits with this equilibrium price and quantity. c. If the government subsidized office visits and required that all consumers were to pay $30 per visit no matter what the actual cost, how many visits would consumers demand? d. What payment per visit would doctors require in order to supply that quantity of visits? e. Calculate total expenditures on office visits under the condition of this $30 co- payment. f. How do total expenditures with a co-payment of $30 compare to total expenditures without government involvement? Provide a numerical answer. Show your work.arrow_forward
- 4. The table below shows the labor requirements for Mr. and Mrs. Howell for pineapples and coconuts. Which is the most accurate statement? A. Mrs. Howell has a comparative advantage in coconuts and the opportunity cost of 1 coconut for Mrs. Howell is 4 pineapples B. Mrs. Howell has a comparative advantage in pineapples and the opportunity cost of 1 pineapple for Mrs. Howell is .25 coconuts. C. Mr. Howell has a comparative advantage in pineapples and the opportunity cost of 1 pineapple is 1 coconut. D. Mr. Howell has a comparative advantage in both pineapples and coconuts and should specialize in pineapples. Labor Requirements for Pineapples and Coconuts 1 Pineapple 1 Coconut Mr. Howell 1 hour 1 hour Mrs. Howell 1/2 hour 2 hoursarrow_forward4. Supply and Demand. The table gives hypothetical data for the quantity of electric scooters demanded and supplied per month. Price per Electric Scooter Quantity Quantity Demanded Supplied $150 500 250 $175 475 350 $200 450 450 $225 425 550 $250 400 650 $275 375 750 a. Graph the demand and supply curves. Note if you prefer to hand draw separately, you may and insert the picture separately. Price per Scooter 300 275 250 225 200 175 150 250 400 375425475 350 450 550 650 750 500 850 Quantity b. Find the equilibrium price and quantity using the graph above. c. Illustrate on your graph how an increase in the wage rate paid to scooter assemblers would affect the market for electric scooters. Label any new lines in the same graph above to distinguish changes. d. What would happen if there was an increase in the wage rate paid to scooter assemblers at the same time that tastes for electric scooters increased? 1ངarrow_forward3. Production Costs Clean 'n' Shine is a competitor to Spotless Car Wash. Like Spotless, it must pay $150 per day for each automated line it uses. But Clean 'n' Shine has been able to tap into a lower-cost pool of labor, paying its workers only $100 per day. Clean 'n' Shine's production technology is given in the following table. To determine its short-run cost structure, fill in the blanks in the table. Fill in the columns below. Outpu Capita Labor TFC TVC TC MC AFC AVC ATC 1 0 30 1 1 70 1 2 120 1 3 160 1 4 190 1 5 210 1 6 a. Over what range of output does Clean 'n' Shine experience increasing marginal returns to labor? Over what range does it experience diminishing marginal returns to labor? (*answer both questions) b. As output increases, do average fixed costs behave as described in the text? Explain. C. As output increases, do marginal cost, average variable cost, and average total cost behave as described in the text? Explain. d. Looking at the numbers in the table, but without…arrow_forward
- Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...EconomicsISBN:9781337091985Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning





