
Introduction:
A. The instructor is using a convenience sample, and his/her power over the students is to imply that they must fill out his survey. This is not an appropriate way to gather data for publication.
B. The researcher does not have a therapist-client relationship to protect, so it is legal to comply with the demands of the police. The police are within their rights to collect this information in order to enforce the law.
C. If the author determines that all the other interviews were not falsified, and leaves out the findings of those 25, it would be permissible to publish, as long as the difficulty is mentioned somewhere in the book along with the results.
D. Research cannot be done by deceiving the subjects. This is an ethical violation.
E. The professor may not lie to subjects in order to complete an experiment, and grades should not be falsely lowered to produce the desired effect.
F. Questions written in a leading manner, such as this one, will produce flawed results. This is not acceptable.
G. Since alcohol consumption is dangerous in many ways, the researcher is obligated to publish the findings so that the college may address this trend to reduce the risks faced by students.
H. This study is focused on saving face, but sets up a situation in which people will lose face when the deception is revealed. This is not acceptable as subjects should not be misled.
I. There is a power differential between students and administration, so many students will infer that they must complete the survey. This is not overt deceit, but taking advantage of behavior tendencies related to students’ perceived obligations. As long as no one is punished for not filling out the survey, and no one is rewarded, it is permissible.
J. An official who infiltrates a group should not take part in illegal activity, and should tip off the authorities about planned violence, if they are unable to dissuade the group from committing these crimes.

Explanation of Solution
Answer and explanation:
(This question requires a subjective response, this is an example.)
A. This is not an appropriate way to gather data for publication because the instructor is using a convenience sample, and his/her power over the students to imply that they must fill out this survey. Students cannot be compelled to participate in research because this violates the ethical requirement that participation be voluntary. It also precludes the participants’ right to withdraw from research at any time for any (or no) reason.
B. The police are within their rights to collect this information in order to enforce the law, since the researcher cannot claim therapist-client privacy, it is ethical to comply with the demands of the police.
C. It would be permissible to publish, as long as the difficulty is mentioned somewhere in the book along with the results, and the author could show that all the other interviews were not falsified, nor affected the outcome of the study. Otherwise, the study must be redone.
D. It is an ethical violation to deceive subjects of a study.
E. The professor should not lower grades or berate students under false pretenses just to study their reactions. This is another example of deceiving subjects.
F. Leading questions bias results. This is not acceptable because the researcher is attempting to get people to admit they masturbate.
G. Colleges try to limit dangers faced by students, and pervasive flouting of drinking rules presents clear and present danger, therefore the researcher must publish.
H. This is not acceptable as subjects should not be misled or be made to feel shame or other psychological harm. This study is focused on saving face, but sets up a situation in which people will lose face when the deception is revealed.
I. This is not overt deceit, but taking advantage of behavior tendencies related to students’ perceived obligations because there is a power differential between students and administration, so many students will infer that they must complete the survey. As long as no one is punished for not filling out the survey, and no one is rewarded, it is permissible.
J. A researcher must not be a party to any violent or illegal activity, so he or she should try to talk the group out of the bombing and assassination, or report them to the police. Peaceful demonstrations are not threatening, and it would be okay for the researcher to take part in that.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 3 Solutions
BASICS OF SOCIAL RESEARCH,ENHANCED (LL)
- Some products are so common and in-demand that they seem to be available almost everywhere — gas stations, grocery stores, convenience shops, you name it. These kinds of items usually follow what’s called an intensive distribution strategy — the idea being that no one should have to go far to find them. Think about products that fit this approach. What kinds of items really need to be available everywhere to be successful? What makes them a good fit for this kind of strategy? Also, consider a specific product that always seems to be on hand wherever shopping happens — something people don’t want to go out of their way to find. How does that constant availability shape how people feel about the brand? Does it build loyalty, or is it more about convenience?arrow_forwardSome people see art as a reflection of reality — like a mirror that shows something true about human nature. Others think art goes deeper, not just reflecting the world but helping us make sense of it or even transform how we see ourselves. Philosophers like Plato and Aristotle had one way of thinking about this, while others like Nietzsche and Heidegger saw art as something more emotional or revealing. Think of a piece of art — maybe a movie, book, song, or painting — that really resonated. Did it feel like it captured something real or universal about life? Or did it challenge old ideas and open up something new or unexpected? It’s also interesting to think about how art connects to truth. Does it just imitate what already exists, or can it reveal things that logic and science can’t? Does it bring comfort or help process emotion, like Aristotle’s idea of catharsis? Or does it shake things up, like in more postmodern or philosophical ways of thinking?arrow_forwardStart by identifying a belief that feels true — something that seems reliable or meaningful in everyday life. Then consider what kind of reasoning or experience supports that belief. If the belief is grounded in observation or sensory experience (like being awake), it may relate to empiricism or the correspondence theory of truth. If the belief fits within a structured system, such as mathematics or logic, Cartesian rationalism or the coherence theory might offer support. For beliefs that aren’t easily proven through evidence or logic, perspectives like deconstruction, pragmatism, or the Ewe Creativity approach may offer insight. Consider how this belief connects to one or more of these ideas about truth, and how that connection helps clarify why the belief makes sense.arrow_forward
- I’ve been thinking about how different philosophers view the idea of the “self.” Between Plato and Aristotle, are there any beliefs about the self that you personally connect with or disagree with? How do their views compare to your own experience or perspective on identity? Some things to consider might be: Do you think we’re born with a set “essence” that shapes who we are (like the avocado view), or are we more shaped by our experiences, environment, and choices (like the artichoke view)? Or do you lean more toward the idea that there’s no fixed or separate self at all, like some non-Western philosophies suggest? How much do you think things like race, gender, class, or sexuality influence who we are? Do you believe gender identity is biologically fixed, or something more fluid and shaped by individual experience?arrow_forwardSeveral movies and television shows have portrayed individuals with special needs. Watch and review one of these films or television shows. Based on your readings and coursework, do you think the portrayals are accurate? Why or why not? What other reflections do you have after watching the movie/show? Suggested films/shows: Tim Of Mice and Men Nell Forrest Gump The Other Sister Memory Keeper’s Daughter The Good Doctor (show) The Theory of Everything Temple Grandin Peanut Butter Falcon Atypical CODA The Elephant Man Finding Nemo I Am Sam Rain Man You are not limited to these options! Feel free to choose another movie/show with characters with special needs that may be of interest to you. - Include a short summary of the movie/show, a description of the character with special needs, and your reflections from watching the movie/show.arrow_forwardwhat are some concepts from the video: Understand blockchain in under 7 minutes: Don Tapscott with Lloyds Bank https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isuAPyuqS7Y and how does it impact the future from a societal perspectivearrow_forward
- How to explain to a school system that you live in your current address when they are accusing you of living elsewhere and when proof of residency has already been submitted?arrow_forwardHow to explain to a school system that you live in your current address when they are accusing you of living elsewhere?arrow_forwardIn the video: "How Schools Kill Creativity" https://www.ted.com/talks/sir_ken_robinson_do_schools_kill_creativity What are 2 ideas that Ken Robinson mentioned that can impact the future of educationarrow_forward
- Step 1: Find 2 news articles about a topic with opposing viewpoints that is of interest to you. You will provide the links in your submission. Step 2: Provide an article (link or copy paste) into ChatGPT, Perplexity Al, or other generative Al platform, and ask it to analyze the article using Burke's Pentad. You can ask it to use the questions below. What are some notable language choices? What is said about the agent (who did it, what kind of person are they)? What is said about agency (by what means or with what instrument was it done)? • How is the act described (what was done)? • • • • Is there any mention of the scene (where/when/what was happening during this time)? What is being implied or stated as the purpose (why was it done)? Considering the choices regarding language, agent, agency, act, and scene, what does the article/report seem to suggest caused or motivated the act? Optional: Do you see a particular ratio being advanced? Step 3: Repeat the process for a second article…arrow_forwardPhilosophical inquiry often raises questions about what it means to truly understand something. One important concept in this area is dialectic, a method of dialogue that encourages deep thinking and challenges assumptions. This is especially clear in Socratic conversations, which tend to stand out from ordinary talk because they focus less on winning an argument and more on uncovering the truth. The Socratic Method often centers on everyday beliefs—things people assume without questioning—and works by asking probing questions that reveal contradictions or gaps in understanding. In works like Meno and The Republic, the difference between knowledge and opinion becomes a central theme, especially in how Socrates guides others to realize what they do or don’t actually know. This also ties into a bigger question: is it even possible to know anything for certain? Can people ever reach perfect wisdom, especially when it comes to big, abstract ideas like justice, virtue, or truth? Some…arrow_forwardHow do the philosophical differences between conservatives and liberals influence policy debates on healthcare, education, and welfare?arrow_forward
- Social Psychology (10th Edition)SociologyISBN:9780134641287Author:Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. SommersPublisher:Pearson College DivIntroduction to Sociology (Eleventh Edition)SociologyISBN:9780393639407Author:Deborah Carr, Anthony Giddens, Mitchell Duneier, Richard P. AppelbaumPublisher:W. W. Norton & CompanyThe Basics of Social Research (MindTap Course Lis...SociologyISBN:9781305503076Author:Earl R. BabbiePublisher:Cengage Learning
- Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Scien...SociologyISBN:9780134477596Author:Saferstein, RichardPublisher:PEARSONSociology: A Down-to-Earth Approach (13th Edition)SociologyISBN:9780134205571Author:James M. HenslinPublisher:PEARSONSociety: The Basics (14th Edition)SociologyISBN:9780134206325Author:John J. MacionisPublisher:PEARSON





