The two standpoints that describe the level of impact a manager could make towards the success or failure of an organization. Introduction: It is usually believed that managers are responsible for organizational outcomes, be it good or bad. However, there might be certain factors that are beyond their control, creating major impacts upon organizational performance. Two views suggesting the two notions above has been put forward by management experts. They explain the extent to which managers could affect organizational success or failure.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 3, Problem 1RDQ

Summary Introduction

To explain:

The two standpoints that describe the level of impact a manager could make towards the success or failure of an organization.

Introduction:

It is usually believed that managers are responsible for organizational outcomes, be it good or bad. However, there might be certain factors that are beyond their control, creating major impacts upon organizational performance. Two views suggesting the two notions above has been put forward by management experts. They explain the extent to which managers could affect organizational success or failure.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

It is an accepted ideology that managers have a major influence over organizational performance. Nevertheless, one could argue that managers cannot be held solely responsible for performance. There might be external factors over which they have no control. Experts suggest two standpoints that describe the two views aforesaid. The omnipotent view suggests that managers are the ones directly responsible for organizational performance. They are expected to take charge of every element that impacts upon the organization be it internal or external. Being in line with this view, managers are seen as heroes at good times and are given all the credit for positive outcomes.

On the contrary, during times of hardships, the managers are the ones held responsible no matter what the circumstances are. On the other hand, the symbolic view suggests that the extent of a manager’s ability to impact upon organizational performance is affected by external factors. Economic conditions, political climate, actions of competitors are some examples of such external factors.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Please original work Who owns a customer's information in United States and Europe? Who should profit from it? How would that work Please cite in text reference and add weblinks

What significant role context plays in social interactions

The losses for the pump in the previous question are estimated to be 15% of the relative dynamic head at inlet to the impeller and 45% of the dynamic head at inlet to the diffuser. Calculate the head delivered and the efficiency of the pump. Answers: 4.12m;75.4%

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 3, Problem 1RDQ

Summary Introduction

To explain:

The two standpoints that describe the level of impact a manager could make towards the success or failure of an organization.

Introduction:

It is usually believed that managers are responsible for organizational outcomes, be it good or bad. However, there might be certain factors that are beyond their control, creating major impacts upon organizational performance. Two views suggesting the two notions above has been put forward by management experts. They explain the extent to which managers could affect organizational success or failure.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

It is an accepted ideology that managers have a major influence over organizational performance. Nevertheless, one could argue that managers cannot be held solely responsible for performance. There might be external factors over which they have no control. Experts suggest two standpoints that describe the two views aforesaid. The omnipotent view suggests that managers are the ones directly responsible for organizational performance. They are expected to take charge of every element that impacts upon the organization be it internal or external. Being in line with this view, managers are seen as heroes at good times and are given all the credit for positive outcomes.

On the contrary, during times of hardships, the managers are the ones held responsible no matter what the circumstances are. On the other hand, the symbolic view suggests that the extent of a manager’s ability to impact upon organizational performance is affected by external factors. Economic conditions, political climate, actions of competitors are some examples of such external factors.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 3, Problem 1RDQ

Summary Introduction

To explain:

The two standpoints that describe the level of impact a manager could make towards the success or failure of an organization.

Introduction:

It is usually believed that managers are responsible for organizational outcomes, be it good or bad. However, there might be certain factors that are beyond their control, creating major impacts upon organizational performance. Two views suggesting the two notions above has been put forward by management experts. They explain the extent to which managers could affect organizational success or failure.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

It is an accepted ideology that managers have a major influence over organizational performance. Nevertheless, one could argue that managers cannot be held solely responsible for performance. There might be external factors over which they have no control. Experts suggest two standpoints that describe the two views aforesaid. The omnipotent view suggests that managers are the ones directly responsible for organizational performance. They are expected to take charge of every element that impacts upon the organization be it internal or external. Being in line with this view, managers are seen as heroes at good times and are given all the credit for positive outcomes.

On the contrary, during times of hardships, the managers are the ones held responsible no matter what the circumstances are. On the other hand, the symbolic view suggests that the extent of a manager’s ability to impact upon organizational performance is affected by external factors. Economic conditions, political climate, actions of competitors are some examples of such external factors.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 3, Problem 1RDQ

Summary Introduction

To explain:

The two standpoints that describe the level of impact a manager could make towards the success or failure of an organization.

Introduction:

It is usually believed that managers are responsible for organizational outcomes, be it good or bad. However, there might be certain factors that are beyond their control, creating major impacts upon organizational performance. Two views suggesting the two notions above has been put forward by management experts. They explain the extent to which managers could affect organizational success or failure.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

It is an accepted ideology that managers have a major influence over organizational performance. Nevertheless, one could argue that managers cannot be held solely responsible for performance. There might be external factors over which they have no control. Experts suggest two standpoints that describe the two views aforesaid. The omnipotent view suggests that managers are the ones directly responsible for organizational performance. They are expected to take charge of every element that impacts upon the organization be it internal or external. Being in line with this view, managers are seen as heroes at good times and are given all the credit for positive outcomes.

On the contrary, during times of hardships, the managers are the ones held responsible no matter what the circumstances are. On the other hand, the symbolic view suggests that the extent of a manager’s ability to impact upon organizational performance is affected by external factors. Economic conditions, political climate, actions of competitors are some examples of such external factors.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 3, Problem 1RDQ

Summary Introduction

To explain:

The two standpoints that describe the level of impact a manager could make towards the success or failure of an organization.

Introduction:

It is usually believed that managers are responsible for organizational outcomes, be it good or bad. However, there might be certain factors that are beyond their control, creating major impacts upon organizational performance. Two views suggesting the two notions above has been put forward by management experts. They explain the extent to which managers could affect organizational success or failure.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

It is an accepted ideology that managers have a major influence over organizational performance. Nevertheless, one could argue that managers cannot be held solely responsible for performance. There might be external factors over which they have no control. Experts suggest two standpoints that describe the two views aforesaid. The omnipotent view suggests that managers are the ones directly responsible for organizational performance. They are expected to take charge of every element that impacts upon the organization be it internal or external. Being in line with this view, managers are seen as heroes at good times and are given all the credit for positive outcomes.

On the contrary, during times of hardships, the managers are the ones held responsible no matter what the circumstances are. On the other hand, the symbolic view suggests that the extent of a manager’s ability to impact upon organizational performance is affected by external factors. Economic conditions, political climate, actions of competitors are some examples of such external factors.

Answer 6

Chapter 3, Problem 1RDQ

Summary Introduction

To explain:

The two standpoints that describe the level of impact a manager could make towards the success or failure of an organization.

Introduction:

It is usually believed that managers are responsible for organizational outcomes, be it good or bad. However, there might be certain factors that are beyond their control, creating major impacts upon organizational performance. Two views suggesting the two notions above has been put forward by management experts. They explain the extent to which managers could affect organizational success or failure.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

It is an accepted ideology that managers have a major influence over organizational performance. Nevertheless, one could argue that managers cannot be held solely responsible for performance. There might be external factors over which they have no control. Experts suggest two standpoints that describe the two views aforesaid. The omnipotent view suggests that managers are the ones directly responsible for organizational performance. They are expected to take charge of every element that impacts upon the organization be it internal or external. Being in line with this view, managers are seen as heroes at good times and are given all the credit for positive outcomes.

On the contrary, during times of hardships, the managers are the ones held responsible no matter what the circumstances are. On the other hand, the symbolic view suggests that the extent of a manager’s ability to impact upon organizational performance is affected by external factors. Economic conditions, political climate, actions of competitors are some examples of such external factors.

Answer 7

Chapter 3, Problem 1RDQ

Summary Introduction

To explain:

The two standpoints that describe the level of impact a manager could make towards the success or failure of an organization.

Introduction:

It is usually believed that managers are responsible for organizational outcomes, be it good or bad. However, there might be certain factors that are beyond their control, creating major impacts upon organizational performance. Two views suggesting the two notions above has been put forward by management experts. They explain the extent to which managers could affect organizational success or failure.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

It is an accepted ideology that managers have a major influence over organizational performance. Nevertheless, one could argue that managers cannot be held solely responsible for performance. There might be external factors over which they have no control. Experts suggest two standpoints that describe the two views aforesaid. The omnipotent view suggests that managers are the ones directly responsible for organizational performance. They are expected to take charge of every element that impacts upon the organization be it internal or external. Being in line with this view, managers are seen as heroes at good times and are given all the credit for positive outcomes.

On the contrary, during times of hardships, the managers are the ones held responsible no matter what the circumstances are. On the other hand, the symbolic view suggests that the extent of a manager’s ability to impact upon organizational performance is affected by external factors. Economic conditions, political climate, actions of competitors are some examples of such external factors.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Ch. 3 - Prob. 1RDQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 2RDQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 3RDQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 4RDQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 5RDQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 6RDQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 7RDQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 8RDQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 11ED Ch. 3 - Prob. 12ED

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 3 Solutions