(a)
Whether higher levels of education for women will lead to an increase or decrease in the
Explanation of Solution
The opportunity cost for a mother who chooses/decides not to work outside the home will be high if there are higher levels of education for women. This is because higher levels of education will ensure higher earnings for the women, thus the amount of earnings forgone by staying at home will increase for mothers, thus increased opportunity costs.
Introduction:
Opportunity costs is the cost in terms of forgone benefit that a person could have received by choosing an alternative course of action.
(b)
Whether higher
Explanation of Solution
If the unemployment rates are higher, then there will be a decline in the opportunity costs for staying at home. Higher unemployment rates will mean lesser opportunity of getting a job, and therefore lower opportunity cost.
Introduction:
Opportunity costs is the cost in terms of forgone benefit that a person could have received by choosing an alternative course of action.
(c)
Whether higher average pay levels for women will lead to an increase or decrease in the opportunity costs for mothers who decide not to work outside the home.
Explanation of Solution
The opportunity cost for forgoing job opportunities for staying at home will be higher if the average earnings of the women are higher as they will have to forgo higher amount of money.
Introduction:
Opportunity costs is the cost in terms of forgone benefit that a person could have received by choosing an alternative course of action
(d)
Whether lower
Explanation of Solution
Lower demand for labor in industries that traditionally employ women will imply lower chances for women to get a job in the industry. Since they will not be able to get a job, the opportunity cost for staying at home is decreases in comparison to working.
Introduction:
Opportunity costs is the cost in terms of forgone benefit that a person could have received by choosing an alternative course of action.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 3 Solutions
ECON MICRO (with ECON MICRO Online, 1 term (6 months) Printed Access Card) (New, Engaging Titles from 4LTR Press)
- Microeconomics Unit 4 Practice Sheet Riya Price Part 1: Monopoly- Use the graph of a non-price discriminating monopoly to answer the following questions. Show your work when asked to calculate. $160 $140 1. Identify the profit maximizing price and quantity. $120 MC 2. Calculate the total revenue at the profit $100 maximizing price and quantity. ATC $80 3. Calculate the total cost at the profit maximizing price and quantity. $60 4. Calculate the profit or loss at the profit maximizing price and quantity. $40 5. Calculate the area of deadweight loss. $20 6. Identify the socially optimal MR D (allocatively efficient) price and quantity. 7. Identify the price and quantity where the total revenue is maximized. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Quantity 8. At the price of $120, is the demand relatively elastic, relatively inelastic, or unit elastic? Why? 9. Identify the price and quantity if this monopoly's fixed costs increase by $140. 10. Identify the profit maximizing price…arrow_forwardGeneral Accountingarrow_forwardDouble Trouble and Career Choices It is Sunday afternoon, and you’re attending your twin nephews’ high school graduation party. Your sister, the mom of the twins, brings you a piece of cake and starts venting about the twins, exclaiming, “Could you believe those guys? Jamal wants to go to school to become a musician while Khalil wants to join the National Guard! Like, why don't they do what normal kids do, like attend medical school or business school or become teachers or something so they can land on a good paying job? I don’t get them. They are so irrational, aren’t they?” Then, your sister looked at you and posed the following questions. "Please tell me: Who is more rational in their choice, Jamal or Khalil? Why do you think they made the career choice they did? Why didn’t they choose the same fields of study as their friends, like medicine, education, business, or aviation?"arrow_forward
- Double Trouble and Career Choices It is Sunday afternoon, and you’re attending your twin nephews’ high school graduation party. Your sister, the mom of the twins, brings you a piece of cake and starts venting about the twins, exclaiming, “Could you believe those guys? Jamal wants to go to school to become a musician while Khalil wants to join the National Guard! Like, why don't they do what normal kids do, like attend medical school or business school or become teachers or something so they can land on a good paying job? I don’t get them. They are so irrational, aren’t they?” Then, your sister looked at you and posed the following questions. "Please tell me: Who is more rational in their choice, Jamal or Khalil? Why do you think they made the career choice they did? Why didn’t they choose the same fields of study as their friends, like medicine, education, business, or aviation?"arrow_forwardhow do i memorise the graphs in ib economics?arrow_forwardUse a Eviews software to develop the residual diagnostic on: 1) Autocorrelation (Topic 6) a) Explain what is Autocorrelation b) Explain how to remove the Autocorrelation c) Report the result on Durbin Watson test before and after consider the lag dependent variable d) Report the result on Breusch-Godfrey Serial Correlation LM test before and after consider the lag dependent variable e) Interpret the resultarrow_forward
- Section 1 Answer all questions. Show all your workings. (a) Suppose there are two firms 1 and 2, whose abatement costs are given by c₁(e₁) and c₂ (e₂), where e denotes emissions and subscripts denote the firm. We assume that c{(e;) 0 for i = 1,2 and for any level of emission e we have c₁'(e) # c₂'(e). Furthermore, assume the two firms make different contributions towards pollution concentration in a nearby river captured by the transfer coefficients ε₁ and 2 such that for any level of emission e we have 2(e) +2 The regulator does not know the resulting C₁'(e) Τι environmental damages. Using an analytical approach explain carefully how the regulator may limit the concentration of pollution using (i) a Pigouvian tax scheme and (ii) uniform emissions standards. Discuss the cost-effectiveness of both approaches to control pollution. [200 marks] (b) "Whether the regulator sells or gives away tradeable emission permits free of charge, the quantities of emissions produced by firms are the…arrow_forwardSection 1 Answer all questions. Show all your workings. (a) Suppose there are two firms 1 and 2, whose abatement costs are given by c₁(e₁) and c₂ (e₂), where e denotes emissions and subscripts denote the firm. We assume that c{(e;) 0 for i = 1,2 and for any level of emission e we have c₁'(e) # c₂'(e). Furthermore, assume the two firms make different contributions towards pollution concentration in a nearby river captured by the transfer coefficients ε₁ and 2 such that for any level of emission e we have 2(e) +2 The regulator does not know the resulting C₁'(e) Τι environmental damages. Using an analytical approach explain carefully how the regulator may limit the concentration of pollution using (i) a Pigouvian tax scheme and (ii) uniform emissions standards. Discuss the cost-effectiveness of both approaches to control pollution. [200 marks] (b) "Whether the regulator sells or gives away tradeable emission permits free of charge, the quantities of emissions produced by firms are the…arrow_forwardExotic Coffee for the Poor? What a Genius Idea! you are a business consultant at a coffee shop. Your team leader came to you one morning with excitement on her face and told you, "Guess what? I have an idea for a great location for our next coffee shop. Think about it, Riceville is a city that has 150,000 people. Most of them are above the age of 16, which means they are potential coffee drinkers. Well, even though the majority of people in that city are making minimum wage and are considered poor, but the good news is that there are no coffee shops in Riceville and the only places you could get coffee there either restaurants or gas stations. What do you think?" Knowing that your company’s average drink price is $5.50, and the stores have nice sit-down areas and offer free WIFI and study spaces: What type of information about consumers in that area do you need to gather and understand to determine if people there will actually consume your coffee? How do the concepts of “budget and…arrow_forward
- (c) Assume an infinite horizon, continuous time and certainty. Furthermore, assume an additively separable utility function in consumption C and pollution stock S so that, U(C,S) = u(C) + v(S), where uc > 0; Ucc 0. Note that the first derivative, and the second subscript denotes the second derivative. The evolution of the pollution stock S over time is a function of consumption, decay rate of the stock of pollution & and abatement through the function, g(S) with gs > 0 and 9ss < 0. Time subscripts are ignored for ease of notation. Show that in the case of a stock pollutant, the marginal utility of consumption should equal the present value of disutility associated with the pollution stock. Interpret the condition.arrow_forwardQ3/for a closed loop system whose block diagram is shown in the figure determine the values of K and t such that the maximum overshoot to the unit step input is 25% and time to peak is 2 sec K 1+TS $2arrow_forward2. Question The 'Democratic Family' consists of three members {mother m, father f, daughter d}, that have different preferences with respect to how much money X € [0,8] they think should be invested in the new family car. These preferences can be represented by the following utility functions: - Mother m: um(X) = 2X - X² Father f: uf(X) = 10X - X² - Daughter d: ud(X) = 4X - X² Calculate for each family member (f, m, d) the preferred amount of money to invest in the new car denoted by X; for i = {m, f,d}. Assume that (Xf, Xm, Xd) are the three alternatives on which the family must decide. Show that each family member has rational preferences over this domain. Preferences on the family level are determined by pairwise majority voting (all family members vote on two alternatives). Derive the family preference and check whether it is rational. Assume that the final family decision is made by conducting sequential pair- wise majority voting, where the loosing alternative is eliminated. Does…arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStaxPrinciples of MicroeconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781305156050Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...EconomicsISBN:9781337091985Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning