data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2d9e/e2d9ee9843191d442af70d4671af543922c541c6" alt="Statistics"
(a)
Define the conclusion based on the provided information.
(a)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2698b/2698b129880c27e76a91019c9f73226195062b2d" alt="Check Mark"
Explanation of Solution
Based on the given information, out of 12,866 men aged 35–57 at high risk of heart disease, 6,428 subjects were randomly assigned to the intervention group and the remaining 6,438 men were assigned to the control group.
Let x represent the intervention group and y represent the control group.
The following values are known:
It is observed that the sample means and sample standard deviations are approximately same in both groups. This indicates that the groups are approximately the same prior to the application of the treatments. Therefore, it may not be expected that any lurking variables affect the results of the experiment.
(b)
Describe the conclusion based on the provided information.
(b)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2698b/2698b129880c27e76a91019c9f73226195062b2d" alt="Check Mark"
Explanation of Solution
Let x represent the intervention group and y represent the control group.
The following values are known:
It is observed that the sample means and sample standard deviations are both lower in the intervention group in comparison to the control group. This indicates that the treatment group appears to have been effective. The average blood pressure appears to have decreased in the intervention group, while the blood pressure was approximately the same in the two groups preceding to the treatments.
(c)
Delineate the conclusion based on the provided information.
(c)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2698b/2698b129880c27e76a91019c9f73226195062b2d" alt="Check Mark"
Explanation of Solution
Let x represent the intervention group and y represent the control group.
The following values are known:
It is observed that the sample means and sample standard deviations are approximately the same in both groups. This indicates that the groups are approximately the same prior to the application of the treatments. Therefore, it may not be expected that any lurking variables affect the results of the experiment.
(d)
Label the conclusion based on the provided information.
(d)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2698b/2698b129880c27e76a91019c9f73226195062b2d" alt="Check Mark"
Explanation of Solution
Let x represent the intervention group and y represent the control group.
The following values are known:
It is observed that the sample means and sample standard deviations are both lower in the intervention group in comparison to the control group. This indicates that the treatment group appears to have a decreased serum cholesterol level. The average serum cholesterol level appears to have decreased in the intervention group, while the serum cholesterol level was approximately the same in the two groups preceding to the treatments.
(e)
Explain the conclusion based on the provided information.
(e)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2698b/2698b129880c27e76a91019c9f73226195062b2d" alt="Check Mark"
Explanation of Solution
Let x represent the intervention group and y represent the control group.
The following values are known:
It is observed that the sample proportion of smoking is approximately the same in both groups. This indicates that the groups are approximately the same prior to the application of treatments. Therefore, it may not be expected that any lurking variables affect the results of the experiment.
(f)
Explain the conclusion based on the provided information.
(f)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2698b/2698b129880c27e76a91019c9f73226195062b2d" alt="Check Mark"
Explanation of Solution
Let x represent the intervention group and y represent the control group.
The following values are known:
It is observed that the sample proportion of smoking is lower in the interval group in comparison with the control group. This indicates that the treatment group appears to have decreased the likelihood to smoke as the proportion of smoking appears to have reduced in the intervention group. On the other hand, the proportion of smoking was approximately the same in the two groups preceding to the treatment.
(g)
Elucidate the conclusion based on the provided information.
(g)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2698b/2698b129880c27e76a91019c9f73226195062b2d" alt="Check Mark"
Explanation of Solution
From the information provided, 211 men died after 6 years in the intervention group and 219 men died after 6 years in the control.
Since the difference between two groups is 8
Therefore, this indicates that the treatment appears to have no effect on the death rate as the number of deaths remained approximately the same in the two treatment groups.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 29 Solutions
Statistics
- Theorem 1.2 (1) Suppose that P(|X|≤b) = 1 for some b > 0, that EX = 0, and set Var X = 0². Then, for 0 0, P(X > x) ≤e-x+1²² P(|X|>x) ≤2e-1x+1²² (ii) Let X1, X2...., Xn be independent random variables with mean 0, suppose that P(X ≤b) = 1 for all k, and set oσ = Var X. Then, for x > 0. and 0x) ≤2 exp Σ k=1 (iii) If, in addition, X1, X2, X, are identically distributed, then P(S|x) ≤2 expl-tx+nt²o).arrow_forwardTheorem 5.1 (Jensen's inequality) state without proof the Jensen's Ineg. Let X be a random variable, g a convex function, and suppose that X and g(X) are integrable. Then g(EX) < Eg(X).arrow_forwardCan social media mistakes hurt your chances of finding a job? According to a survey of 1,000 hiring managers across many different industries, 76% claim that they use social media sites to research prospective candidates for any job. Calculate the probabilities of the following events. (Round your answers to three decimal places.) answer parts a-c. a) Out of 30 job listings, at least 19 will conduct social media screening. b) Out of 30 job listings, fewer than 17 will conduct social media screening. c) Out of 30 job listings, exactly between 19 and 22 (including 19 and 22) will conduct social media screening. show all steps for probabilities please. answer parts a-c.arrow_forward
- Question: we know that for rt. (x+ys s ا. 13. rs. and my so using this, show that it vye and EIXI, EIYO This : E (IX + Y) ≤2" (EIX (" + Ely!")arrow_forwardTheorem 2.4 (The Hölder inequality) Let p+q=1. If E|X|P < ∞ and E|Y| < ∞, then . |EXY ≤ E|XY|||X|| ||||qarrow_forwardTheorem 7.6 (Etemadi's inequality) Let X1, X2, X, be independent random variables. Then, for all x > 0, P(max |S|>3x) ≤3 max P(S| > x). Isk≤narrow_forward
- Theorem 7.2 Suppose that E X = 0 for all k, that Var X = 0} x) ≤ 2P(S>x 1≤k≤n S√2), -S√2). P(max Sk>x) ≤ 2P(|S|>x- 1arrow_forwardThree players (one divider and two choosers) are going to divide a cake fairly using the lone divider method. The divider cuts the cake into three slices (s1, s2, and s3).If the chooser's declarations are Chooser 1: {s3} and Chooser 2: {s3}, which of the following is a fair division of the cake?arrow_forwardTheorem 1.4 (Chebyshev's inequality) (i) Suppose that Var X x)≤- x > 0. 2 (ii) If X1, X2,..., X, are independent with mean 0 and finite variances, then Στη Var Xe P(|Sn| > x)≤ x > 0. (iii) If, in addition, X1, X2, Xn are identically distributed, then nVar Xi P(|Sn> x) ≤ x > 0. x²arrow_forwardTheorem 2.5 (The Lyapounov inequality) For 0arrow_forwardTheorem 1.6 (The Kolmogorov inequality) Let X1, X2, Xn be independent random variables with mean 0 and suppose that Var Xk 0, P(max Sk>x) ≤ Isk≤n Σ-Var X In particular, if X1, X2,..., X, are identically distributed, then P(max Sx) ≤ Isk≤n nVar X₁ x2arrow_forwardTheorem 3.1 (The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality) Suppose that X and Y have finite variances. Then |EXYarrow_forwardarrow_back_iosSEE MORE QUESTIONSarrow_forward_iosRecommended textbooks for you
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman
MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage LearningElementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman