Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Course List)
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Course List)
16th Edition
ISBN: 9781305506725
Author: James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher: Cengage Learning
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 28, Problem 1CQ
To determine

Distribution of income in United States.

Expert Solution & Answer
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Income inequality is the unequal distribution of income or wages across various participants in an economy. During 2014, the families of lowest fifth category earned about 3.6 percent of income share. The highest fifth families earned 48.9, which is more than 14 times of that lowest fifth. While considering the income share after tax and in-kind government transfer benefits, the highest fifth category earned about 7.4 times of the lowest fifth category. That means, the inequality in the income reduced. The difference in income may occurs when there is difference in education, skill, talent and so on, which cannot be considered as unfair distribution of income. On the other hand, difference in wage, profit and losses will determine the unfairness of income distribution. Thus, the process is important rather than outcomes, which determine the fairness of income distribution.

Economics Concept Introduction

Income inequality:  Income inequality can be defined as the unequal distribution of income or wages across various participants in an economy.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
It is possible to use transformational leadership strategies to reach unethical objectives.  Traditional leadership theories and morals standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues. For the statement above, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statements.
Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.
answer
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506725
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506893
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Economics:
Economics
ISBN:9781285859460
Author:BOYES, William
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Survey of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305260948
Author:Irvin B. Tucker
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Micro Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:9781337613064
Author:Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher:Cengage,
Text book image
Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:9781337617406
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning