Case summary: A company M makes and distributes telehandlers to the dealers. The company M agreed to manufacture for the company MC in city Mi. Later the company M signed an agreement with the company G which manufactured a similar product. The companies allocated territories to each manufacturer. The company MC was precluded from buying and selling company G’s product.
To find: The type of trade restraint between the companies M and G.
Case summary: A company M makes and distributes telehandlers to the dealers. The company M agreed to manufacture for the company MC in city Mi. Later the company M signed an agreement with the company G which manufactured a similar product. The companies allocated territories to each manufacturer. The company MC was precluded from buying and selling company G’s product.
To find: The violation of anti-trust law.
Case summary: A company M makes and distributes telehandlers to the dealers. The company M agreed to manufacture for the company MC in city Mi. Later the company M signed an agreement with the company G which manufactured a similar product. The companies allocated territories to each manufacturer. The company MC was precluded from buying and selling company G’s product.
To find: Injured parties in the given case.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 27 Solutions
Lms Integrated Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card Cross/miller’s The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th
- - What is the difference between a shipment contract and a destination contract with reference to when delivery occurs and its tender requirements under a destination contract? In addition, offer your understanding as to which contract is preferred by the each of parties and why? (Ch 21). - What is the dilemma that is presented by the legal doctrine entitled entrusting to a merchant with a specific focus regarding the rights of the three principal parties: The owner, the merchant seller, the consumer purchaser? (Ch 21).arrow_forwardExcel Co, a meat-packing company sold meat products to Silver Enterprises, the buyer. The buyer contracted the service of a trucking company, ABC Transports Ltd., to transport the goods to Toronto. The goods will then be delivered to a distributor, XY Ltd of which Silver Enterprises is the minority investor. The shipment will be paid in instalment scheme. Unfortunately, the buyer ran into financial troubles and will not be able to settle its financial obligation with the Excel Co. Excel Co initiates and arranges to resell the goods directly to XY Ltd. Excel Co argued that they have the right to resell the goods because they have the title as they retained certain documentation from the buyer until full payment is made. The contract of sale is F.O.B point of shipping. Who has the title of the goods? ABC Transports Ltd., who has not been paid of their service, brought an action before the court to stop the sale. Does it prosper?arrow_forwardPlease help me. Thankyou.arrow_forward
- The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) files suit against Yange Corp. under § 2 of the Sherman Act. To be successful, the FTC must prove that Yange Corp. possesses monopoly power in the relevant market and that the monopoly power was obtained by illegal means. The FTC has no direct evidence that Yange is using its power to control prices and restrict output. The FTC, therefore, must show that Yange Corp. has monopoly power indirectly, by showing that Yange Corp. has a dominant share of the relevant market and that there are significant barriers for new competitors entering that market. The FTC can calculate the market share that Yange Corp. has by: showing the total sales that Yange Corp. has ever had. × showing the net revenue that Yange Corp. had during their year of highest profits. looking at the company's sales compared against the total sales of the industry within a specific period. taking the total sales of the industry over one year, and comparing against industry sales over prior…arrow_forward. Explain when a fiduciary duty comes to an end in light of Blue Line Hockey Acquisition Co. v. Orca Bay Hockey Limited Partnership, 2008 BCSC 27.arrow_forwardConsider Directors Jack is one of 4 directors of Electric Cars Ltd; the company imports green, environmentally friendly vehicles from a sole supplier Acheron Ltd in the UK. Every year the contract between Electric Cars Ltd and Acheron is renegotiated however this year, Acheron indicate to Jack they want to expand their business in New Zealand and include electric bikes. Jack tells the other directors that Electric Cars is reducing their business in New Zealand but secretly incorporates another company. Jack and his wife are the directors of the new company and it takes 50% of Electric cars business and takes up the opportunity to sell electric bikes as well. Jack resigns from Electric cars. The other directors realise that business is suddenly declining and discover that Jack’s new company is taking their business. With reference to directors 1. Explain to Jack – who is eligible to be a director of a company in New Zealand? a. Would your answer be different…arrow_forward
- Stars Co. closed an old automobile manufacturing plant in California because it had become too costly and inefficient to run. Later, XYZ Co. agreed to reopen the plant and manage it with Stars through a business company called New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc. The new company was owned equally by the two partners and each firm entered into the deal primarily to acquire knowledge. XYZ wanted to learn more about how to deal with labor and parts suppliers in the U.S market, and Stars wanted to observe Japanese management practices firsthand.What types of business did XYZ and Stars agree on? * Franchising Licensing agreement O Importing and exporting Strategic Alliancearrow_forwardFranchising is a method of distributing products or services involving a franchisorthat establishes the brand's trademark, trade name, business system, and afranchisee who pays a royalty and an initial fee for the right to do business underthe franchisor's name and system. It is a contractual business relationship. Whatdo you think is the prime advantage and disadvantage in having a business ofthis nature?arrow_forward38) A franchise agreement is a contract between an entrepreneur, the -- and a parent company, the in which the entrepreneur agrees to pay the parent company for use of its trademarks, products, formulas and business practices. franchisee/franchiser borrower/lender investor/investee franchiser/franchiseearrow_forward
- The Concentrated Phosphate Export Association consists of the five largest phosphate producers. The Agency for International Development (AID) undertook to sell fertilizer to Korea and solicited bids. The association set prices and submitted a single bid on 300,000 tons. A paid the contract price, determined the amounts to be purchased, coordinated the procedure for buying, and undertook to resell to Korea. The Justice Department sued the association and its members, claiming that their actions violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act. What defense might the defendants have? What is the result?arrow_forwardOn October 1, 2021, Garcia Exporters, a manufacturer in India, made a contract to sell 200,000 tie-dyed beach chairs to Lesh Imports, a NY corporation, for “$300,000(US), CIF New York, shipment, direct or indirect, to arrive on or before February 1, 2021.” The contract required Lesh Imports to obtain a Letter of Credit “issued or confirmed by a reputable N.Y. commercial bank.” Lesh intended to resell the beach chairs to customers in the northeastern United States in the beginning of March 2022. On October 10, 2021, Hart National Bank (NY) issued a Letter of Credit for the benefit of Garcia in the amount of $300,000(US), to expire on November 30, 2021. The Letter of Credit required presentment of a Bill of Lading showing a shipment “to arrive NY on or before February 1, 2021.” On October 17, 2021, Garcia delivered the 200,000 beach chairs to Weir Shipping Lines in India for shipment to NY on the container ship “Of Fools.” The Bill of Lading, dated October 17, 2021, stated that the ship…arrow_forwardBusiness law discussarrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education