(a)
To explain is there evidence that the presence of nine weeds per meter reduces corn yields when compared with weed-free corn and use Wilcoxon rank sum test with the data given and part of the data from example
(a)
Answer to Problem 27.8AYK
We have sufficient evidence to conclude that the presence of nine weeds per meter reduces corn yields when compared with weed-free corn.
Explanation of Solution
In the question, it is given that the corn yield study of example
0-weed | 9-weed |
166.7 | 162.8 |
172.2 | 162.7 |
165 | 162.4 |
176.9 | 142.4 |
Now, let us use the software to conduct the Wilcoxon test. The hypotheses are defined as: Null hypothesis: There is no difference between them and Alternative hypothesis: The zero-weed field increases corn yield than nine-weed yield. Thus, we have the result as:
n | sum of ranks | |
4 | 26 | 0-weed |
4 | 10 | 9-weed |
8 | 36 | total |
18.00 | |
3.46 | standard deviation |
2.17 | z |
.0152 | p-value (one-tailed, upper) |
No. | Label | Data | Rank |
1 | 0-weed | 166.7 | 6 |
2 | 0-weed | 172.2 | 7 |
3 | 0-weed | 165 | 5 |
4 | 0-weed | 176.9 | 8 |
5 | 9-weed | 162.8 | 4 |
6 | 9-weed | 142.4 | 1 |
7 | 9-weed | 162.7 | 3 |
8 | 9-weed | 162.4 | 2 |
Thus, we have test statistics vale and P-value as:
As we know that if the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level then the null hypothesis is rejected, so we have,
Thus, we have sufficient evidence to conclude that the presence of nine weeds per meter reduces corn yields when compared with weed-free corn.
(b)
To compare the results from part (a) with those from the two-sample t test for these data.
(b)
Answer to Problem 27.8AYK
We have sufficient evidence to conclude that the presence of nine weeds per meter reduces corn yields when compared with weed-free corn.
Explanation of Solution
In the question, it is given that the corn yield study of example
0-weed | 9-weed |
166.7 | 162.8 |
172.2 | 162.7 |
165 | 162.4 |
176.9 | 142.4 |
Thus, the hypotheses will be defined as:
Thus, for testing the hypothesis we will use the calculator
Thus, by using the calculator
As we know that if the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level then the null hypothesis is rejected, so we have,
Thus, we have sufficient evidence to conclude that the presence of nine weeds per meter reduces corn yields when compared with weed-free corn. So, we can see that the P-value for both the tests are less than the level of significance and thus, the conclusion for both is same. Also the test statistics value is approximately equal.
(c)
To repeat the Wilcoxon test and t analyses by removing the outlier
(c)
Explanation of Solution
In the question, it is given that the corn yield study of example
0-weed | 9-weed |
166.7 | 162.8 |
172.2 | 162.7 |
165 | 162.4 |
176.9 |
Now, we have to conduct both the test by removing the outlier
n | sum of ranks | |
4 | 22 | 0-weed |
3 | 6 | 9-weed |
7 | 28 | total |
16.00 | expected value |
2.83 | standard deviation |
1.94 | z |
.0259 | p-value (one-tailed, upper) |
No. | Label | Data | Rank |
1 | 0-weed | 166.7 | 5 |
2 | 0-weed | 172.2 | 6 |
3 | 0-weed | 165 | 4 |
4 | 0-weed | 176.9 | 7 |
5 | 9-weed | 162.8 | 3 |
6 | 9-weed | 162.7 | 2 |
7 | 9-weed | 162.4 | 1 |
Now, if we compare it with the above result in part (a), we can see that both the P-values are less than the level of significance so the conclusion will be the same but the mean is decreased by two and the standard deviation is decreased by:
Now, let us conduct the two-sample t test, thus, for testing the hypothesis we will use the calculator
Thus, by using the calculator
Now, if we compare it with the above result in part (b), we can see that both the P-values are less than the level of significance so the conclusion will be the same but the standard deviation is decreased by two and the mean is decreased by:
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 27 Solutions
PRACT STAT W/ ACCESS 6MO LOOSELEAF
- solve the question based on hw 1, 1.41arrow_forwardT1.4: Let ẞ(G) be the minimum size of a vertex cover, a(G) be the maximum size of an independent set and m(G) = |E(G)|. (i) Prove that if G is triangle free (no induced K3) then m(G) ≤ a(G)B(G). Hints - The neighborhood of a vertex in a triangle free graph must be independent; all edges have at least one end in a vertex cover. (ii) Show that all graphs of order n ≥ 3 and size m> [n2/4] contain a triangle. Hints - you may need to use either elementary calculus or the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality.arrow_forwardWe consider the one-period model studied in class as an example. Namely, we assumethat the current stock price is S0 = 10. At time T, the stock has either moved up toSt = 12 (with probability p = 0.6) or down towards St = 8 (with probability 1−p = 0.4).We consider a call option on this stock with maturity T and strike price K = 10. Theinterest rate on the money market is zero.As in class, we assume that you, as a customer, are willing to buy the call option on100 shares of stock for $120. The investor, who sold you the option, can adopt one of thefollowing strategies: Strategy 1: (seen in class) Buy 50 shares of stock and borrow $380. Strategy 2: Buy 55 shares of stock and borrow $430. Strategy 3: Buy 60 shares of stock and borrow $480. Strategy 4: Buy 40 shares of stock and borrow $280.(a) For each of strategies 2-4, describe the value of the investor’s portfolio at time 0,and at time T for each possible movement of the stock.(b) For each of strategies 2-4, does the investor have…arrow_forward
- Negate the following compound statement using De Morgans's laws.arrow_forwardNegate the following compound statement using De Morgans's laws.arrow_forwardQuestion 6: Negate the following compound statements, using De Morgan's laws. A) If Alberta was under water entirely then there should be no fossil of mammals.arrow_forward
- Negate the following compound statement using De Morgans's laws.arrow_forwardCharacterize (with proof) all connected graphs that contain no even cycles in terms oftheir blocks.arrow_forwardLet G be a connected graph that does not have P4 or C3 as an induced subgraph (i.e.,G is P4, C3 free). Prove that G is a complete bipartite grapharrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman