Concept explainers
a.
To determine: Expected
a.
Explanation of Solution
Table that shows the calculation of the expected present values of the cash flow is as follows:
Condition | Probability | Cash Flows ($) | Present value ($) |
Good | 30% | 9 | 2.70 |
Medium | 40% | 4 | 1.60 |
Bad | 30% | -1 | -0.30 |
Expected present value | 4 |
Table (1)
Table that shows calculation of the Net present value is as follows:
Particulars | Cash Flow | Present value factor | Present value |
Initial Cost (A) | 4 | 1 | 4 |
Cash Flows: (B) | |||
Year 1 | 4 | 0.893 | 3.572 |
Year 2 | 4 | 0.797 | 3.188 |
Year 3 | 4 | 0.711 | 2.844 |
NPV | 0.396 |
Table (2)
b.
To decide: If the project should be accepted with the scrap value of $6 million and cash flow in first year only.
b.
Explanation of Solution
Table that shows calculation of the NPV with current scenario is as follows:
Cost | Probability | Future cash flows | NPV | |||
1 ($) | 2 ($) | 3 ($) | ||||
-$10 | 30% | 9 | 9 | 9 | 11.62 | 3.48 |
40% | 4 | 4 | 4 | -0.39 | -0.16 | |
30% | 5 | -5.54 | -1.66 | |||
Expected NPV of future Cash flows | 1.67 |
Table (3)
With the abandonment factor, the expected NPV becomes positive but NPV of medium is negative but higher than the NPV of the medium factor if the project will be abandoned in the year 1 itself.
c.
Estimate: The value of the project.
c.
Explanation of Solution
Table that shows calculation of the Expected NPV is as follows:
Cost | Future operating cash flows | NPV ($) | |||||||
0 | Probability | 1 ($) | 2 ($) | 3 ($) | 4 ($) | 5 ($) | 6 ($) | ||
-10 | 30% | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 27 | 8.10 |
40% | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.39 | -0.16 | |
30% | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -12.40 | -3.72 | |
Expected NPV | 4.22 |
Table (4)
Table that shows calculation of expected NPV after the implementation of additional project is as follows:
Future operating cash flows | NPV ($) | ||||||||
0 | Probability | 1 ($) | 2 ($) | 3 ($) | 4 ($) | 5 ($) | 6 ($) | ||
30% | 0 | 0 | -10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -8.40 | -2.52 | |
40% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
30% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Expected NPV | -2.52 |
Table (5)
Total of the NPV of the future operating cash flows and NPV after the implementation of additional project is $1.70.
Hence, as with the additional project the NPV gets positive, therefore, the project with additional projects should be accepted.
d.
Estimate: The value of the project if it is delayed for one year.
d.
Explanation of Solution
Table that shows calculation of expected NPV of future cash flows with risk-free rate of 6% and WACC of 12% is as follows:
Future operating cash flows | NPV ($) | ||||||
0 | Probability | 1 ($) | 2 ($) | 3 ($) | 4 ($) | ||
Cost | |||||||
30% | 9 | 9 | 9 | 21.62 | 6.48 | ||
40% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
30% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Expected NPV | 6.48 |
Table (6)
Future operating cash flows | NPV ($) | ||||||
0 | Probability | 1 ($) | 2 ($) | 3 ($) | 4 ($) | ||
Cost | |||||||
30% | 0 | 0 | 0 | -9.43 | -2.83 | ||
40% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
30% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Expected NPV | -2.83 |
Table (7)
Total of both the expected NPV is $3.65, which is positive; hence, the project should be accepted without any delaying 1 year.
e.
Estimate: The value of the growth option using Black-Scholes model.
e.
Explanation of Solution
Table that shows calculation of the expected NPV is as follows:
Cost | Future operating cash flows | NPV ($) | |||||||
0 | Probability | 1 ($) | 2 ($) | 3 ($) | 4 ($) | 5 ($) | 6 ($) | ||
30% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 15.39 | 4.62 | |
40% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6.84 | 2.74 | |
30% | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1.71 | -0.51 | |
Expected NPV | 6.84 |
Table (8)
Formula to calculate total value is as follows:
Substituting the equation with $6.84 for P, 0.56 for N(d1), 0.26 for N(d2) and $10.00 for X to calculate value of growth option.
Formula to calculate total value is as follows:
Substituting the Equation with -$0.39 for the value of original project and $1.71 for the value of growth option to calculate total value.
Hence, the project should be accepted even if the value of original project is negative; as the total value with the growth option is greater than 0.
Working Note:
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 26 Solutions
EBK FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT: THEORY & PRAC
- Jasmine Manufacturing is considering a project that will require an initial investment of $52,000 and is expected to generate future cash flows of $10,000 for years 1 through 3, $8,000 for years 4 and 5, and $2,000 for years 6 through 10. What is the payback period for this project?arrow_forwardTropical Sweets is considering a project that will cost $70 million and will generate expected cash flows of $30 million per year for 3 years. The cost of capital for this type of project is 10%, and the risk-free rate is 6%. After discussions with the marketing department, you learn that there is a 30% chance of high demand with associated future cash flows of $45 million per year. There is also a 40% chance of average demand with cash flows of $30 million per year as well as a 30% chance of low demand with cash flows of only $15 million per year. What is the expected NPV?arrow_forwardGina Ripley, president of Dearing Company, is considering the purchase of a computer-aided manufacturing system. The annual net cash benefits and savings associated with the system are described as follows: The system will cost 9,000,000 and last 10 years. The companys cost of capital is 12 percent. Required: 1. Calculate the payback period for the system. Assume that the company has a policy of only accepting projects with a payback of five years or less. Would the system be acquired? 2. Calculate the NPV and IRR for the project. Should the system be purchasedeven if it does not meet the payback criterion? 3. The project manager reviewed the projected cash flows and pointed out that two items had been missed. First, the system would have a salvage value, net of any tax effects, of 1,000,000 at the end of 10 years. Second, the increased quality and delivery performance would allow the company to increase its market share by 20 percent. This would produce an additional annual net benefit of 300,000. Recalculate the payback period, NPV, and IRR given this new information. (For the IRR computation, initially ignore salvage value.) Does the decision change? Suppose that the salvage value is only half what is projected. Does this make a difference in the outcome? Does salvage value have any real bearing on the companys decision?arrow_forward
- Your firm is considering the launch of a new product, the XJ5. The upfront development cost is $10 million, and you expect to earn a cash flow of $3.1 million per year for the next 5 years. Create a table for the NPV profile for this project for discount rates ranging from 0% to 30% (in intervals of 5%). For which discount rates is the project attractive? The NPV for a discount rate of 0% is $1.751 million. (Round to three decimal places.)arrow_forwardOasis Entertainment Systems is setting up to manufacture a new line of video game consoles. The cost of the manufacturing equipment is OMR 1750000. Expected cash flows over the next four years are OMR 725000, OMR 850000, OMR 1200000, and OMR 1500000. Given the company's required rate of return of 15 percent, what is the NPV of this project? Select one: a. 3122607.27 OMR b. 4669806.27 OMR c. None of these d. 2919806.27 OMR e. 1169806.27 OMRarrow_forwardSuppose you have a project that will cost $800,000 last for ten years. The cash flows foreach year have an expected value of $175,000 with a standard deviation of $20,000. Thecost of capital is 10%. Use a Monte Carlo simulation with 1,000 replications to evaluatethis project using the NPV and IRR approaches.arrow_forward
- Solve the problem below. Two project proposals have been presented to XYZ Corporation. Project A requires an initial investment of Php 80,000.00 and the expected annual cash return is Php 30,000.00 for initial investment of Php 60,000.00 and the expected annual cash return is Php 20,000.00 for 5 years. years. Project B requires an a. What is the payback period of each project? b. Compute for the net present value of each project if the cost of capital is 10%. c. Which project should XYZ Corporation accept? Why?arrow_forwardMendez Company is considering a capital project that costs $16,000. The project will deliver the following cash flows: Year 5 Year 4 $6,000 $5,000 $5,000 Using the incremental approach, the payback period for the investment is: Year 1 $8,000 Year 2 $6,000 Multiple Choice 2 years. 2.4 years. 5 years. 1.66 years. Year 3arrow_forwardWinston Clinic is evaluating a project that costs $52, 125 and has expected net cash inflows of $12,000 per year for eight years. The first inflow occurs one year after the cost outflow, and the project has a cost of capital of 12 percent. What is the project's payback? What is the project's NPV? Its IRR? Its MIRR? Is the project financially acceptable? Explain your answer.arrow_forward
- Mendez Company is considering a capital project that costs $35,000. The project will deliver the following cash flows: Ac raw Year 1 $14,000 Year 2 $12,000 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 $10,000 $12,000 $10,000 Using the incremental approach, the payback period for the investment is: Multiple Choice O 1.38 years. 2.9 years. 5 years. 2 years.arrow_forwardBig Steve's, makers of swizzle sticks, is considering the purchase of a new plastic stamping machine. This investment requires an initial outlay of $110,000 and will generate net cash inflows of $17,000 per year for 8 years. a.What is the project's NPV using a discount rate of 8%? Should the project be accepted? Why or why not? b.What is the project's NPV using a discount rate of 17%? Should the project be accepted? Why or why not?arrow_forwardLynchburg Development has a project that is expected to produce cash inflows of $3,200 a year for 4 years with a final cash inflow of $4,700 in year 5. The project's initial cost is $10,500. What is the modified internal rate of return (MIRR) of this project using method #3 (the combination approach) if the required rate of return is 7.8 percent? Group of answer choices 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0%arrow_forward
- Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course...FinanceISBN:9781337395083Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. DavesPublisher:Cengage LearningCornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Principles of Accounting Volume 2AccountingISBN:9781947172609Author:OpenStaxPublisher:OpenStax College