How to justify the validity of relativity to a friend who argues that relativity is absurd as it is obvious that moving clocks don’t run slow and moving object aren’t shorter than when they are at rest.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 26, Problem 1CQ

To determine

How to justify the validity of relativity to a friend who argues that relativity is absurd as it is obvious that moving clocks don’t run slow and moving object aren’t shorter than when they are at rest.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1CQ

The effect of relativity is not obvious to human as the objects we come across have very less speed when compared to the speed of light. However it cannot show the absurdity of the theory of relativity.

Explanation of Solution

The observation of relativity is obvious for objects with speed comparable to the speed of light. In day to day life we encounter objects whose speed is much smaller than the speed of light.

The theory of relativity is equally applicable to objects of all speed. However the effect of relativity on the objects, human being generally encounter is very small, which is beyond the capability of human senses to differentiate. Thus it is not obvious that moving clocks don’t run slow and moving object isn’t shorter than when they are at rest. However it cannot show the absurdity of the theory of relativity.

Conclusion:

The effect of relativity is not obvious to human as the objects we come across have very less speed when compared to the speed of light. However it cannot show the absurdity of the theory of relativity.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

two satellites are in circular orbits around the Earth. Satellite A is at an altitude equal to the Earth's radius, while satellite B is at an altitude equal to twice the Earth's radius. What is the ratio of their periods, Tb/Ta

Fresnel lens: You would like to design a 25 mm diameter blazed Fresnel zone plate with a first-order power of +1.5 diopters. What is the lithography requirement (resolution required) for making this lens that is designed for 550 nm? Express your answer in units of μm to one decimal point. Fresnel lens: What would the power of the first diffracted order of this lens be at wavelength of 400 nm? Express your answer in diopters to one decimal point. Eye: A person with myopic eyes has a far point of 15 cm. What power contact lenses does she need to correct her version to a standard far point at infinity? Give your answer in diopter to one decimal point.

Paraxial design of a field flattener. Imagine your optical system has Petzal curvature of the field with radius p. In Module 1 of Course 1, a homework problem asked you to derive the paraxial focus shift along the axis when a slab of glass was inserted in a converging cone of rays. Find or re-derive that result, then use it to calculate the paraxial radius of curvature of a field flattener of refractive index n that will correct the observed Petzval. Assume that the side of the flattener facing the image plane is plano. What is the required radius of the plano-convex field flattener? (p written as rho )

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 26, Problem 1CQ

To determine

How to justify the validity of relativity to a friend who argues that relativity is absurd as it is obvious that moving clocks don’t run slow and moving object aren’t shorter than when they are at rest.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1CQ

The effect of relativity is not obvious to human as the objects we come across have very less speed when compared to the speed of light. However it cannot show the absurdity of the theory of relativity.

Explanation of Solution

The observation of relativity is obvious for objects with speed comparable to the speed of light. In day to day life we encounter objects whose speed is much smaller than the speed of light.

The theory of relativity is equally applicable to objects of all speed. However the effect of relativity on the objects, human being generally encounter is very small, which is beyond the capability of human senses to differentiate. Thus it is not obvious that moving clocks don’t run slow and moving object isn’t shorter than when they are at rest. However it cannot show the absurdity of the theory of relativity.

Conclusion:

The effect of relativity is not obvious to human as the objects we come across have very less speed when compared to the speed of light. However it cannot show the absurdity of the theory of relativity.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 26, Problem 1CQ

To determine

How to justify the validity of relativity to a friend who argues that relativity is absurd as it is obvious that moving clocks don’t run slow and moving object aren’t shorter than when they are at rest.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1CQ

The effect of relativity is not obvious to human as the objects we come across have very less speed when compared to the speed of light. However it cannot show the absurdity of the theory of relativity.

Explanation of Solution

The observation of relativity is obvious for objects with speed comparable to the speed of light. In day to day life we encounter objects whose speed is much smaller than the speed of light.

The theory of relativity is equally applicable to objects of all speed. However the effect of relativity on the objects, human being generally encounter is very small, which is beyond the capability of human senses to differentiate. Thus it is not obvious that moving clocks don’t run slow and moving object isn’t shorter than when they are at rest. However it cannot show the absurdity of the theory of relativity.

Conclusion:

The effect of relativity is not obvious to human as the objects we come across have very less speed when compared to the speed of light. However it cannot show the absurdity of the theory of relativity.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 26, Problem 1CQ

To determine

How to justify the validity of relativity to a friend who argues that relativity is absurd as it is obvious that moving clocks don’t run slow and moving object aren’t shorter than when they are at rest.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1CQ

The effect of relativity is not obvious to human as the objects we come across have very less speed when compared to the speed of light. However it cannot show the absurdity of the theory of relativity.

Explanation of Solution

The observation of relativity is obvious for objects with speed comparable to the speed of light. In day to day life we encounter objects whose speed is much smaller than the speed of light.

The theory of relativity is equally applicable to objects of all speed. However the effect of relativity on the objects, human being generally encounter is very small, which is beyond the capability of human senses to differentiate. Thus it is not obvious that moving clocks don’t run slow and moving object isn’t shorter than when they are at rest. However it cannot show the absurdity of the theory of relativity.

Conclusion:

The effect of relativity is not obvious to human as the objects we come across have very less speed when compared to the speed of light. However it cannot show the absurdity of the theory of relativity.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 26, Problem 1CQ

To determine

How to justify the validity of relativity to a friend who argues that relativity is absurd as it is obvious that moving clocks don’t run slow and moving object aren’t shorter than when they are at rest.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1CQ

The effect of relativity is not obvious to human as the objects we come across have very less speed when compared to the speed of light. However it cannot show the absurdity of the theory of relativity.

Explanation of Solution

The observation of relativity is obvious for objects with speed comparable to the speed of light. In day to day life we encounter objects whose speed is much smaller than the speed of light.

The theory of relativity is equally applicable to objects of all speed. However the effect of relativity on the objects, human being generally encounter is very small, which is beyond the capability of human senses to differentiate. Thus it is not obvious that moving clocks don’t run slow and moving object isn’t shorter than when they are at rest. However it cannot show the absurdity of the theory of relativity.

Conclusion:

The effect of relativity is not obvious to human as the objects we come across have very less speed when compared to the speed of light. However it cannot show the absurdity of the theory of relativity.

Answer 6

Chapter 26, Problem 1CQ

To determine

How to justify the validity of relativity to a friend who argues that relativity is absurd as it is obvious that moving clocks don’t run slow and moving object aren’t shorter than when they are at rest.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1CQ

The effect of relativity is not obvious to human as the objects we come across have very less speed when compared to the speed of light. However it cannot show the absurdity of the theory of relativity.

Explanation of Solution

The observation of relativity is obvious for objects with speed comparable to the speed of light. In day to day life we encounter objects whose speed is much smaller than the speed of light.

The theory of relativity is equally applicable to objects of all speed. However the effect of relativity on the objects, human being generally encounter is very small, which is beyond the capability of human senses to differentiate. Thus it is not obvious that moving clocks don’t run slow and moving object isn’t shorter than when they are at rest. However it cannot show the absurdity of the theory of relativity.

Conclusion:

The effect of relativity is not obvious to human as the objects we come across have very less speed when compared to the speed of light. However it cannot show the absurdity of the theory of relativity.

Answer 7

Chapter 26, Problem 1CQ

To determine

How to justify the validity of relativity to a friend who argues that relativity is absurd as it is obvious that moving clocks don’t run slow and moving object aren’t shorter than when they are at rest.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1CQ

The effect of relativity is not obvious to human as the objects we come across have very less speed when compared to the speed of light. However it cannot show the absurdity of the theory of relativity.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Explanation of Solution

The observation of relativity is obvious for objects with speed comparable to the speed of light. In day to day life we encounter objects whose speed is much smaller than the speed of light.

The theory of relativity is equally applicable to objects of all speed. However the effect of relativity on the objects, human being generally encounter is very small, which is beyond the capability of human senses to differentiate. Thus it is not obvious that moving clocks don’t run slow and moving object isn’t shorter than when they are at rest. However it cannot show the absurdity of the theory of relativity.

Conclusion:

The effect of relativity is not obvious to human as the objects we come across have very less speed when compared to the speed of light. However it cannot show the absurdity of the theory of relativity.

Answer 12

Ch. 26.1 - Prob. 26.1CP Ch. 26.3 - Practice Problem 26.1 Journey to Newly Formed...Ch. 26.4 - Prob. 26.4CP Ch. 26.4 - Prob. 26.2PP Ch. 26.5 - Prob. 26.3PP Ch. 26.6 - Prob. 26.4PP Ch. 26.7 - Prob. 26.5PP Ch. 26.7 - Prob. 26.7CP Ch. 26.8 - Prob. 26.6PP Ch. 26.8 - Prob. 26.7PP

How to justify the validity of relativity to a friend who argues that relativity is absurd as it is obvious that moving clocks don’t run slow and moving object aren’t shorter than when they are at rest.

Videos

How to justify the validity of relativity to a friend who argues that relativity is absurd as it is obvious that moving clocks don’t run slow and moving object aren’t shorter than when they are at rest.

Answer to Problem 1CQ

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 26 Solutions